Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T17:20:23.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Italy's democratic quality and the role of political parties: comparative empirical patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2025

Guido Panzano Open the ORCID record for Guido Panzano [Opens in a new window]  and
Sofia Marini Open the ORCID record for Sofia Marini [Opens in a new window]
Guido Panzano
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany Centre d'Etude de la Vie Politique, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
Sofia Marini*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Government, Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria
*
Corresponding author: Sofia Marini; Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Italy is considered a thorny case for comparativists, as its unique political and party system features often make it stand out among liberal democracies. A prominent tradition has been studying Italy's democratic quality. However, such analyses need to be improved and updated, especially to incorporate recent trends, systematically compare Italy with other liberal democracies over time, and fully exploit the recent wealth of empirical data. Additionally, the relatively poor quality of some components of Italian democracy needs to be explained. Many hypotheses have been advanced, although rarely tested through quantitative comparisons. Here, we limit our focus to the role of political parties. As fundamental gatekeepers performing functions of linkage and representation, parties are core tenets of a healthy democracy. Yet, if they operate poorly – for example, being too personalized or loosely institutionalized – they can negatively affect democratic quality. Therefore, we first describe the ups and downs of various dimensions of Italy's democratic quality compared to other liberal democracies, to examine whether and when Italy is a forerunner, latecomer, or outlier of specific tendencies. Next, we investigate via regression analysis how two party organizational features (personalization and institutionalization) relate to democratic quality. We show how Italy's democratic performance varies depending on the dimension analyzed, and most of its defects (among others, in rule of law, accountability, and competition) are linked to high party personalization and low institutionalization.

Keywords

democracydemocratic qualityItalyparty organization
Type
Research Article
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , First View , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Società Italiana di Scienza Politica

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Almagisti, M (2008) La qualità della democrazia in Italia. Capitale sociale e politica. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
Basedau, M and Stroh, A (2008) Measuring party institutionalization in developing countries: a new research instrument applied to 28 African political parties. GIGA Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg-Schlosser, D (2004) The quality of democracies in Europe as measured by current indicators of democratization and good governance. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 20, 28–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boese, VA, Edgell, AB, Hellmeier, S, Maerz, SF and Lindberg, SI (2021) How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process. Democratization 28, 885–907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bühlmann, M, Merkel, W, Müller, L and Weßels, B (2012) The democracy barometer: a new instrument to measure the quality of democracy and its potential for comparative research. European Political Science 11, 519–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calise, M (1992) Come cambiano i partiti. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Calise, M (2015) The personal party: an analytical framework. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 45, 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casal Bértoa, F (2017) Political parties or party systems? Assessing the “myth” of institutionalisation and democracy. West European Politics 40, 402–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casal Bértoa, F and Enyedi, Z (2022) Who governs Europe? A new historical dataset on governments and party systems since 1848. European Political Science 21, 150–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claassen, C (2020) Does public support help democracy survive? American Journal of Political Science 64, 118–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, M, Lindberg, S, Skaaning, S-E and Teorell, J (2016) Measuring high level democratic principles using the V-Dem data. International Political Science Review 37, 580–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, M, Gerring, J, Knutsen, CH, Lindberg, SI, Teorell, J, Altman, D, Angiolillo, F, Bernhard, M, Borella, C, Cornell, A, Fish, MS, Fox, L, Gastaldi, L, Gjerlow, H, Glynn, A, Good God, A, Grahn, S, Hicken, A, Kinzelbach, K, Marquardt, KL, McMann, K, Mechkova, V, Neundorf, A, Paxton, P, Pemstein, D, Rydén, O, von Römer, J, Seim, B, Sigman, R, Skaaning, S-E, Staton, J, Sundström, A, Tzelgov, E, Uberti, L, Wang, Y, Wig, T and Ziblatt, D (2024) V-Dem Codebook v14. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4774440 (Last accessed 26/02/2025).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, RJ, Farrell, DM and McAllister, I (2011) Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, L and Morlino, L (2005) Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Mascio, F (2014) Exploring the link between patronage and party institutionalization: an historical-institutional analysis of the Italian transition. Democratization 21, 678–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düpont, N, Kavasoglu, YB, Lührmann, A and Reuter, OJ (2022) A global perspective on party organizations. Validating the varieties of party identity and organization dataset (V-Party). Electoral Studies 75, 102423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emanuele, V (2015) Dataset of Electoral Volatility and its Internal Components in Western Europe (1945–2015). Rome: Italian Center for Electoral Studies. Available at: http://www.vincenzoemanuele.com/dataset-of-electoral-volatility.html (Last accessed 26/02/2025).Google Scholar
Emanuele, V (2016) Dataset of New Parties and Party System Innovation in Western Europe since 1945. Rome: Italian Centre for Electoral Studies. Available at: http://www.vincenzoemanuele.com/dataset-of-party-system-innovation.html (Last accessed 26/02/2025).Google Scholar
Emanuele, V and Chiaramonte, A (2020) Going out of the ordinary. The de-institutionalization of the Italian party system in comparative perspective. Contemporary Italian Politics 12, 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, RM (2016) Rethinking dimensions of democracy for empirical analysis: authenticity, quality, depth, and consolidation. Annual Review of Political Science 19, 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geißel, B, Kneuer, M and Lauth, H-J (2016) Measuring the quality of democracy: introduction. International Political Science Review 37, 571–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziano, P and Quaranta, M (2024) Studying democracy in Europe: conceptualization, measurement and indices. Government and Opposition 59, 605–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmel, R and Janda, K (1994) An integrated theory of party goals and party change. Journal of Theoretical Politics 6, 259–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, RA and Schimpf, CH (2017) On the distinct effects of left-wing and rightwing populism on democratic quality. Politics and Governance 5, 146–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juon, A and Bochsler, D (2020) Hurricane or fresh breeze? Disentangling the populist effect on the quality of democracy. European Political Science Review 12, 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karvonen, L (2014) The Personalisation of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Katz, RS and Mair, P (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics 1, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korosteleva, EA and Hutcheson, D (2006) The Quality of Democracy in Post-Communist Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lauth, H-J (2016) The internal relationships of the dimensions of democracy: the relevance of trade-offs for measuring the quality of democracy. International Political Science Review 37, 606–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, DH and Molina, JE (2011) The Quality of Democracy in Latin America. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, S and Ziblatt, D (2019) How Democracies Die. London: Crown.Google Scholar
Lührmann, A, Tannenberg, M and Lindberg, SI (2018) Regimes of the world (RoW): opening new avenues for the comparative study of political regimes. Politics and Governance 6, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lührmann, A, Marquardt, KL and Mechkova, V (2020) Constraining governments: new indices of vertical, horizontal, and diagonal accountability. American Political Science Review 114, 811–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, S (1999) Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marino, B, Martocchia Diodati, N and Verzichelli, L (2022) The personalization of party politics in Western Europe (1985–2016): evidence from an expert survey. Acta Politica 57, 571–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, J and Skaaning, S-E (2014) The Rule of Law: Definitions, Measures, Patterns and Causes. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlino, L (2003) What is a “good” democracy? Theory and the case of Italy. South European Society and Politics 8, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlino, L (2011) Changes for Democracy: Actors, Structures, Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlino, L (2013) The impossible transition and the unstable new mix: Italy 1992–2012. Comparative European Politics 11, 337–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlino, L (2020) Equality, Freedom, and Democracy: Europe after the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlino, L and Quaranta, M (2016) What is the impact of the economic crisis on democracy? Evidence from Europe. International Political Science Review 37, 618–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlino, L, Piana, D and Raniolo, F (2013) La qualità della democrazia in Italia. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Munck, GL (2016) What is democracy? A reconceptualization of the quality of democracy. Democratization 23, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musella, F and Rullo, L (2024) The personalization of government: concept and comparative analysis. Democratization, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panebianco, A (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pasquino, G and Valbruzzi, M (2010) Still an outlier: Italy in a southern European comparative perspective. Journal of Modern Italian Studies 15, 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizzimenti, E and Ignazi, P (2011) Finanziamento pubblico e mutamenti organizzativi nei partiti italiani. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 41, 199–236.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A (2010) Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puleo, L, Carteny, G and Piccolino, G (2024) Giorgia on their minds: vote switching to Fratelli d'Italia in the Italian general election of 2022. Party Politics, 1–20.Google Scholar
Roberts, A (2009) The Quality of Democracy in Eastern Europe: Public Preferences and Policy Reforms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandri, G, Telò, M and Tomini, L (2013) Political system, civil society and institutions in Italy: the quality of democracy. Comparative European Politics 11, 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarrow, SE, Webb, PD and Poguntke, T (2017) Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, C, Hellmann, T and Paulini, P (2022) Sustainable Governance Indicators 2022. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
Solt, F (2004) Civics or structure? Revisiting the origins of democratic quality in the Italian regions. British Journal of Political Science 34, 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teorell, J (2010) Determinants of Democratization: Explaining Regime Change in the World, 1972–2006. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teorell, J, Dahlberg, S, Holmberg, S, Rothstein, B, Khomenko, A and Svensson, R (2023) The Quality of Government Standard Dataset. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute.Google Scholar
Thomson, R, Royed, T, Naurin, E, Artés, J, Costello, R, Ennser‐Jedenastik, L, Ferguson, M, Kostadinova, P, Moury, C, Pétry, F and Praprotnik, K (2017) The fulfillment of parties' election pledges: A comparative study on the impact of power sharing. American Journal of Political Science 61, 527–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaccaro, A (2023) Digging deeper into the state-democracy nexus: the role of civic participation in fostering impartial bureaucracy. UNU-WIDER Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhanen, T (1997) Prospects of Democracy: A Study of 172 Countries. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Vittori, D (2022) Threat or corrective? Assessing the impact of populist parties in government on the qualities of democracy: a 19-country comparison. Government and Opposition 57, 589–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, P, Scarrow, S and Poguntke, T (2022) Party organization and satisfaction with democracy: inside the blackbox of linkage. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 32, 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunsch, N and Blanchard, P (2023) Patterns of democratic backsliding in third-wave democracies: a sequence analysis perspective. Democratization 30, 278–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Panzano and Marini supplementary material

Panzano and Marini supplementary material
Download Panzano and Marini supplementary material(File)
File 1.4 MB
Supplementary material: Link

Panzano and Marini Dataset

Dataset

http://thedata.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/ipsr-risp
Link