Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T10:26:59.570Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

Backsliding Democracy and the Slippery Slope of Conceptual Weakness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2024

Zoltán Fleck*
Affiliation:
ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Law, Budapest

Abstract

This article discusses the thin socio-legal conceptualisation of the rule of law in Hungary. Employing a culturalist perspective, it first shows how the rule of law had a thin foundation prior to the Second World War in this country. Then, the contribution demonstrates how, contrary to previous understandings, even in the most advanced stages of rule of law building in Hungary, in the early 1990s, the resulting concept had been thin mainly focusing on institutional guarantees and legal certainty. The remaining part of the contribution then critically discusses whether and to what extent it is possible to use backsliding to frame the ongoing legal changes in Hungary.

Type
Special Issue Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ágh, A (1999) The Hungarian Parliament and EU Accession in an East Central European Context. Társadalom És Gazdaság Közép- És Kelet-Európában/Society and Economy in Central and Eastern Europe 21(1), 4375.Google Scholar
Albert, F (2018) The criminalisation of rough sleeping in Hungary. ESPN Flash Report 2018/62. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1135&langId=en.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P and Wacquant, L (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bozóki, A (ed) (2000) A rendszerváltás forgatókönyve. Kerekasztal-tárgyalások 1989-ben. Alkotmányos forradalom. Tanulmányok. Budapest: Új Mandátum.Google Scholar
Bozóki, A (2022) Rolling Transition and the Role of Intellectuals: The Case of Hungary. CEU Press.Google Scholar
Bruszt, L and Horvath, GK (1990): The Negotiated Revolution in Hungary. Social Research 57(2), 365387.Google Scholar
Diamond, L et al. (2016) Authoritarianism Goes Global. The Challenge to Democracy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
European Commission COM (2014) 158 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. A new EU Framework to strengthen the Rule of Law. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0158&from=EN.Google Scholar
Fleck, L (1979) Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E (2017) (translated by Shills, EA), The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galasinska, A and Krzyanowski, M (eds) (2009) Discourse and Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Gárdos-Orosz, F (2021) The reference to constitutional traditions in populist constitutionalism – The case of Hungary, Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies. Available at: https://openarchive.tk.mta.hu/471/1/[25601067 - Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies] The reference to constitutional traditions in populist constitutionalism – The case of Hungary.pdf.Google Scholar
Goodman, N (1988) Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Graver, HP (2015) Judges Against Justice. On Judges When the Rule of Law is Under Attack. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Halliday, T, Karpik, L and Feeley, M (2007) Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Halmai, G (2000) Az 1949-es alkotmány jogállamosítása. In Bozóki A (ed), A rendszerváltás forgatókönyve. Kerekasztal-tárgyalások 1989-ben. Alkotmányos forradalom. Tanulmányok. Budapest: Új Mandátum, pp. 180199.Google Scholar
Halmai, G (2018) Silence of transitional constitutions: The ‘invisible constitution’ concept of the Hungarian Constitutional Court, International Journal of Constitutional Law 16(3) 969984.Google Scholar
Henderson, L (1991) Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law. Scholarly Works. Paper 867. Available at: http://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/867.Google Scholar
Henrich, J (2020) The Weirdest People in the World. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kahn, J (2014) The Law Is a Causeway: Metaphor and the Rule of Law in Russia. In Silkenat, JR et al. (eds), The Legal Doctrines of the Rule of Law and the Legal State (Rechtsstaat). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Keane, J (2009) Life and Death of Democracy. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Kühn, Z (2011) The Judiciary in Central and Eastern Europe. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Lash, L (2002) Critique of Information. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Mandel, R and Humphrey, C (eds) (2002) Markets and Moralities. Ethnographies of Postsocialism. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Matthes, CY (2022) Judges as activists: how Polish judges mobilise to defend the rule of law. East European Politics 38, 468487.Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, J (2018) The Remnants of the Rechtsstaat. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, DG (2020) Legal Sabotage. Ernst Fraenkel in Hitler’s Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Péter, L (2012) Hungary’s Long Nineteenth Century. Constitutional and Democratic Traditions in a European Perspective. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pippa, N and Inglehart, R (2019) Cultural Backlash. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rady, M (2015) Customary Law in Hungary: Courts, Texts, and the Tripartitum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, D (2006) Why and How Ideas Matter. In Goodin, R and Tilly, C (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 227251.Google Scholar
Runciman, D (2008) Political Hypocrisy. The mask of Power from Hobbes to Orwell and Beyond. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sajó, A (2019) The Rule of Law as Legal Despotism: Concerned Remarks on the Use of ‘Rule of Law’ in Illiberal Democracies. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 11, 371376.Google Scholar
Sajó, A (2021) Ruling by Cheating. Governance in Illiberal Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schaffer, T (1998) Democracy in Translation: Understanding Politics in an Unfamiliar Culture. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sólyom, P (2016) Jogászi módszer és politika. Budapest: Gondolat.Google Scholar
Swidler, A (1986) Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review 51, 273286.Google Scholar
Szabó, M (1978) Politikai gondolkodás és kultúra Magyarországon a dualizmus utolsó negyedszázadában. In: Péter H (ed), Magyarország Története 1890-1918. Budapest: Akadémiai, pp. 8731002.Google Scholar
Todosijevic, B and Enyedi, Zs (2008) Authoritarianism without dominant ideology: Political manifestations of authoritarian attitudes in Hungary. Political Psychology 29, 767787.Google Scholar
Tóth, GA (2019) Constitutional Markers of Authoritarianism. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 11, 3761.Google Scholar
Varga, J (2019) Facts You Always Wanted to Know about Rule of Law but Never Dared to Ask, Euronews, 22 October 2019. Available at: https://www.euronews.com/2019/11/19/judit-varga-facts-you-always-wanted-to-know-about-rule-of-law-hungary-view.Google Scholar
World Justice Project The Global Rule of Law Recession Continues. Available at: https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/.Google Scholar