Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-4ks9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-08T11:57:22.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A far ultraviolet-C light technology is effective for decontamination of items in proximity to sinks and is enhanced by a far UV-C reflective surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2024

Claire E. Kaple
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
Samir Memic
Affiliation:
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
Jennifer L. Cadnum
Affiliation:
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
Martin Mathew Varghese
Affiliation:
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
Timothy J. Hebrink
Affiliation:
3M Corporate Research Lab, 3M, St Paul, MN, USA
Curtis J. Donskey*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
*
Corresponding author: Curtis J. Donskey; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Background:

Dispersal of gram-negative bacilli from sink drains has been implicated as a source of transmission in multiple outbreaks.

Methods:

In an acute care hospital, we assessed how often patient care supplies and other frequently touched items were within 1 meter of sink drains. We tested the efficacy of a ceiling-mounted far ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light technology for decontamination of sink bowls and surfaces near sinks with and without a wall-mounted film that reflects far UV-C light.

Results:

Of 190 sinks assessed, 55 (29%) had patient care supplies or other frequently touched items within 1 meter of the drain. The far UV-C technology reduced Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae and Candida auris on steel disk carriers by ≥1.5 log10 colony-forming units (CFU) in 45 minutes. On inoculated real-world items, ≥1.9 log10 CFU reductions in P. aeruginosa were achieved on sites in line with the light source versus 0.4–1.8 log10 CFU reductions on shaded surfaces. The addition of the reflective surface significantly enhanced efficacy in shaded sites (P < 0.01).

Conclusions:

In a hospital setting, patient care supplies and other frequently touched items were often in proximity to sinks. The far UV-C light technology could potentially be useful for sink decontamination in high-risk areas.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
This is a work of the US Government and is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.
Copyright
© Department of Veterans Affairs, 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally.

References

Volling, C, Ahangari, N, Bartoszko, JJ, et al. Are sink drainage systems a reservoir for hospital-acquired gammaproteobacteria colonization and infection? A systematic review. Open Forum Infect Dis 2020;8:ofaa590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hota, S, Hirji, Z, Stockton, K, et al. Outbreak of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and infection secondary to imperfect intensive care unit room design. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:2533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Regev-Yochay, G, Margalit, I, Smollan, G, et al. Sink-traps are a major source for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae transmission. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2024;45:284291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donskey, CJ. Update on potential interventions to reduce the risk for transmission of health care-associated pathogens from floors and sinks. Am J Infect Control 2023;51:A120A125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajar, Z, Mana, TSC, Cadnum, JL, Donskey, CJ. Dispersal of gram-negative bacilli from contaminated sink drains to cover gowns and hands during hand washing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:460462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotay, S, Chai, W, Guilford, W, Barry, K, Mathers, AJ. Spread from the sink to the patient: in situ study using green fluorescent protein (GFP) expressing-Escherichia coli to model bacterial dispersion from hand washing sink trap reservoirs. Appl Environ Microbiol 2017;83:e0332716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gideskog, M, Falkeborn, T, Welander, J, Melhus, Å. Source control of Gram-negative bacteria using self-disinfecting sinks in a Swedish burn centre. Microorganisms 2023;11:965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, ME, Jaworski, M, Harcy, V, et al. Cluster of carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa among patients in an adult intensive care unit:– Idaho, 2021–2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023;72:844846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pejkovska, M, Ricciuto, D, Sultana, A, et al. Epidemiology of healthcare-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care units: are sink drains to blame? J Hosp Infect 2024;148:7786.Google Scholar
Hopman, J, Tostmann, A, Wertheim, H, et al. Reduced rate of intensive care unit acquired gram-negative bacilli after removal of sinks and introduction of ‘water-free’ patient care. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2017;6:59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garvey, MI, Williams, N, Gardiner, A, et al. The sink splash zone. J Hosp Infect 2023;135:154156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aranega-Bou, P, Cornbill, C, Verlander, NQ, Moore, G. A splash-reducing clinical handwash basin reduces droplet-mediated dispersal from a sink contaminated with Gram-negative bacteria in a laboratory model system. J Hosp Infect 2021;114:171174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glowicz, JB, Landon, E, Sickbert-Bennett, EE, et al. SHEA/IDSA/APIC Practice recommendation: strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections through hand hygiene: 2022 Update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023;44:355376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blatchley, ER III, Brenner, DJ, Claus, H, et al. Far UV-C radiation: an emerging tool for pandemic control. Crit Rev Env Sci Technol 2022;53:733753. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2022.2084315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Memic, S, Osborne, AO, Cadnum, JL, Donskey, CJ. Efficacy of a far-ultraviolet-C light technology for continuous decontamination of air and surfaces. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2024;45:132134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piedrahita, CT, Cadnum, JL, Jencson, AL, Shaikh, AA, Ghannoum, MA, Donskey, CJ. Environmental surfaces in healthcare facilities are a potential source for transmission of Candida auris and other Candida species. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:11071109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ASTM International, Designation E2197. Standard quantitative disk carrier test method for determining bactericidal, virucidal, fungicidal, mycobactericidal, and sporicidal activities of chemicals. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2011.Google Scholar
Yablon, BR, Dantes, R, Tsai, V, et al. Outbreak of Pantoea agglomerans bloodstream infections at an oncology clinic-Illinois, 2012–2013. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:314319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hessling, M, Haag, R, Sieber, N, Vatter, P. The impact of far-UVC radiation (200–230 nm) on pathogens, cells, skin, and eyes - a collection and analysis of a hundred years of data. GMS Hyg Infect Control 2021;16:Doc07.Google Scholar
Welch, D, Aquino de Muro, M, Buonanno, M, Brenner, DJ. Wavelength-dependent DNA photodamage in a 3-D human skin model over the far-UVC and germicidal UVC wavelength ranges from 215 to 255 nm. Photochem Photobiol 2022;98:11671171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugihara, K, Kaidzu, S, Sasaki, M, et al. One-year ocular safety observation of workers and estimations of microorganism inactivation efficacy in the room irradiated with 222-nm far ultraviolet-C lamps. Photochem Photobiol 2023;99:967974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukui, T, Niikura, T, Oda, T, et al. Exploratory clinical trial on the safety and bactericidal effect of 222-nm ultraviolet C irradiation in healthy humans. PLoS One 2020;15:e0235948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kousha, O, O’Mahoney, P, Hammond, R, Wood, K, Eadie, E. 222 nm Far-UVC from filtered krypton-chloride excimer lamps does not cause eye irritation when deployed in a simulated office environment. Photochem Photobiol 2024;100:137145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Görlitz, M, Justen, L, Rochette, PJ, et al. Assessing the safety of new germicidal far-UVC technologies. Photochem Photobiol 2024;100:501520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed