Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-06T05:36:10.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond organizational size: Recommendations for addressing the scientist–practitioner gap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2024

Joseph W. Stewart  and
Greg Haudek Open the ORCID record for Greg Haudek [Opens in a new window]
Joseph W. Stewart
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma, Norman, USA
Greg Haudek*
Affiliation:
Hogan Assessments, Tulsa, USA
*
Corresponding author: Greg Haudek; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2024 , pp. 414 - 417
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aguinis, H., & Lawal, S. O. (2013). eLancing: A review and research agenda for bridging the science-practice gap. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamberger, P. (2008). From the editors beyond contextualization: Using context theories to narrow the micro-macro gap in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 839–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, G. C., Pollack, J. M., Bochantin, J. E., Kirkman, B. L., Whelpley, C. E., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2016). Management’s science-practice gap: A grand challenge for all stakeholders. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 2205–2231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, K. M., & Hamby, W. L. Jr. (2013). An analysis of volunteer leader behavior: Self- reported measures. Academy of Business Research Journal, 3, 8–21.Google Scholar
Buckley, M. R., & Norris, A. C. (2000). A brief history of the selection interview: May the next 100 years be more fruitful. Journal of Management History, 6, 113–126.Google Scholar
Collins, D. (2004). Who put the con in consultancy? Fads, recipes, and, vodka margarine. Human Relations, 57, 553–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czarniawska, B., & Sevon, G. (2005). Global ideas: How ideas, objects, and practices travel in the global economy. Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Devoe, S., & Pfeffer, J. (2009). When is happiness about how much you earn? The effect of hourly payment on the money – happiness connection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(12), 1602–1618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harp, E. R., Scherer, L. L., & Allen, J. A. (2016). Volunteer engagement and retention: Their relationship to community service self-efficacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(2), 1–17.Google Scholar
Highhouse, S. A. (2008). Stubborn reliance on intuition and subjectivity in employee selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, G. (2001). In praise of context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotolo, C. T., Church, A. H., Adler, S., Smither, J. W., Colquitt, A. L., Shull, A. C., Paul, K. B., & Foster, G. (2018). Putting an end to bad talent management: A call to action for the field of industrial and organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11(2), 176–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., & Fried, Y. (2001). Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rynes, S. L. (2012). The research-practice gap in I-O psychology and related fields: Challenges and potential solutions. In Kozlowski, S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 409), Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1995). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Stricker, J., Chasiotis, A., Kerwer, M., & Günther, A. (2020). Scientific abstracts and plain language summaries in psychology: A comparison based on readability indices. PLOS ONE, 15(4).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timming, A. R., & Macneil, J. (2023). Bridging human resource management theory and practice: Implications for industry-engaged academic research. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(3), 592–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, S., Campbell, L. N. P., & Fyffe, S. (2024). Quantifying the scientist-practitioner gap: How do small business owners react to our academic articles? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 17, 379–398.Google Scholar