Hostname: page-component-669899f699-b58lm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T10:31:01.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Bodymind Problem and the Possibilities of Pain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2014

Margaret Price
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What is a crip politics of bodymind? Drawing upon Rosemarie Garland‐Thomson's theory of the misfit, I explain my understanding of crip and bodymind within a feminist materialist framework, and argue that careful investigation of a crip politics of bodymind must involve accounting for two key, but under‐explored, disability studies (DS) concepts: desire and pain. I trace the turn toward desire that has characterized DS theory for the last decade, and argue that while acknowledging disability desire, we must also attend to the aspects of disability, including pain, that are sometimes bad. Although I don't argue that pain is always and only bad, I call for recognition of the ways pain complicates disability desire, as well as the possibilities it opens for specifically located, collective forms of care.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 30 , Issue 1: Special Issue: New Conversations in Feminist Disability Studies , Winter 2015 , pp. 268 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

The Azolla Story (with writing by Stacey Milbern, Mia Mingus, and Leah Lakshmi Piepzna Samarasinha). 2011. Pieces of us: The telling of our transformation. make/shift 9: 20–22.Google Scholar
Bednarska, Dominika. 2012. Reconsidering pain: What the counterculture has to offer. Modern Language Association. Seattle, Wash, January 8.Google Scholar
Carlson, Licia. 2010. The faces of intellectual disability: Philosophical reflections. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Clare, Eli. 1999. Freaks and queers. In Exile and pride: Disability, queerness, and liberation. Cambridge, Mass.: South End Press.Google Scholar
Clare, Eli. 2009. Thinking about the word crip. Eli Clare. http://eliclare.com/poems/thinking-about-the-word-crip (accessed August 15, 2013).Google Scholar
Crow, Liz. 1996. Including all of our lives: Renewing the social model of disability. In Encounters with strangers: Feminism and disability, ed. Morris, Jenny. London: The Women's Press.Google Scholar
Crunk Feminist Collective. 2010–2014. Archive: Self‐care. The Crunk Feminist Collective. http://crunkfeministcollective.wordpress.com/category/self-care-2/ (accessed March 1, 2014).Google Scholar
Dolmage, Jay Timothy. 2013. It has been interesting. Facebook update, November 27 (accessed November 27, 2013).Google Scholar
Dolmage, Jay Timothy. 2014. Disability rhetoric. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Elizabeth J. 2011. Revisiting the corpus of the madwoman: Further notes toward a feminist disability studies theory of mental illness. In Feminist disability studies, ed. Hall, Kim Q. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Erevelles, Nirmala. 2011. Disability and difference in global contexts: Enabling a transformative body politic. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabris, Erick. 2011. Tranquil prisons: Chemical incarceration under community treatment orders. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Kennan. 1999. The politics of judgment: Aesthetics, identity, and political theory. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Garland‐Thomson, Rosemarie. 2011. Misfits: A feminist materialist disability concept. Hypatia 26 (3): 591–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland‐Thomson, Rosemarie. 2013. Disability studies: A field emerged. American Quarterly 65 (4): 915–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. Patrick. 2001. “Quare” studies, or (almost) everything I know about queer studies I learned from my grandmother. Text and Performance Quarterly 21 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Merri Lisa. 2010. Girl in need of a tourniquet: Memoir of a borderline personality. Berkeley: Seal Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Merri Lisa, and McRuer, Robert. 2013 Call for papers: Cripistemologies. Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies. April 4. http://www.csgsnyu.org/2013/03/cripistemologies/ (accessed April 4, 2013).Google Scholar
Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Christine. 2013. Building bridges with accessible care: Disability studies, feminist care scholarship, and beyond. Hypatia 28 (4): 784–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Eunjung. Forthcoming. Unbecoming human: An ethics of objects. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 21 (2–3). Special issue on “Queer Inhumanisms,” ed. Mel Chen and Dana Luciano.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 2002. When caring is just and justice is caring. In The subject of care: Feminist perspectives on dependency, ed. Feder Kittay, Eva and Feder, Ellen K. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kolářová, Kateřina. 2010. Performing the pain: Opening the (crip) body for (queer) pleasures. Review of Disability Studies 6 (3): 44–52.Google Scholar
Lewiecki‐Wilson, Cynthia. 2003. Rethinking rhetoric through mental disabilities. Rhetoric Review 22 (2): 156–67.Google Scholar
Lewiecki‐Wilson, Cynthia and Cellio, Jen. 2011. Introduction: On liminality and cultural embodiment. In Disability and mothering: Liminal spaces of embodied knowledge, ed. Lewiecki‐Wilson, Cynthia and Cellio, Jen. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
McLane, Janice. 1996. The voice on the skin: Self‐mutilation and Merleau‐Ponty's theory of language. Hypatia 11 (4): 107–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRuer, Robert. 2006. Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
McRuer, Robert and Wilkerson, Abby L. 2003. Introduction: Cripping the (queer) nation. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 9 (1–2): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mingus, Mia. 2010. Wherever you are is where I want to be: Crip solidarity. Leaving evidence, May 3. http://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/where-ever-you-are-is-where-i-want-to-be-crip-solidarity/ (accessed March 1, 2014).Google Scholar
Mollow, Anna. 2006. “When Black women start going on Prozac”: Race, gender, and mental illness in Meri Nana‐Ama Danquah's Willow Weep for Me. MELUS 31 (3): 67–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagatomo, Shigenori. 1992. Attunement through the body. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Nicki, Andrea. 2001. The abused mind: Feminist theory, psychiatric disability, and trauma. Hypatia 16 (4): 80–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patsavas, Alyson. 2014. Recovering a cripistemology of pain: Leaky bodies, connective tissue, and feeling discourse. Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies 8 (2): 203–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelan, Shane. 1994. Getting specific: Postmodern lesbian politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Price, Margaret. 2011. Mad at school: Rhetorics of mental disability and academic life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pussycat, Dolls. 2005. “Don't cha.” Pcd. A&M.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Babette. 2000. The body remembers: The psychophysiology of trauma and trauma treatment. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Sandahl, Carrie. 2003. Queering the crip or cripping the queer? Intersections of queer and crip identities in solo autobiographical performance. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 9 (1–2): 25–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, Tom. 2006. Disability rights and wrongs. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherry, Mark. 2013. Crip politics? Just … no. The Feminist Wire, November 23 http://thefeministwire.com/2013/11/crip-politics-just-no/ (accessed November 27, 2013).Google Scholar
Shildrick, Margrit. 1997. Leaky bodies and boundaries: Feminism, postmodernism and (bio)ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siebers, Tobin. 2008. Disability theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titchkosky, Tanya. 2007. Reading and writing disability differently: The textured life of embodiment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titchkosky, Tanya. 2011. The question of access: Disability, space, meaning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Titchkosky, Tanya. 2012. The ends of the body as pedagogic possibility. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies 34 (3–4): 82–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Sophia Isako. 2010. Duties of justice to citizens with cognitive disabilities. In Cognitive disability and its challenge to moral philosophy, ed. Feder Kittay, Eva and Carlson, Licia. Oxford: Wiley‐Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yergeau, Melanie. 2011. Defending and (re)defining self‐advocacy. Aspie rhetor: On autism, rhetoric, technology, & ELO. http://aspierhetor.com/2011/06/19/defending-and-redefining-self-advocacy/ (accessed March 1, 2014).Google Scholar
Yergeau, Melanie. 2012. I stim, therefore I am. Aspie rhetor: On autism, rhetoric, technology, and ELO. http://aspierhetor.com/2012/01/26/i-stim-therefore-i-am-loud-hands-blogaround/ (accessed August 15, 2013).Google Scholar
Yergeau, Melanie. 2013. Clinically significant disturbance: On theorists who theorize theory of mind. Disability Studies Quarterly 33 (4): n.p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar