Hostname: page-component-669899f699-g7b4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T16:33:13.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Form and mode of life of Dicellograptus (Graptolithina)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

S. Henry Williams
S. Henry Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, The University, Glasgow, G12 8QQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The majority of Dicellograptus species have stipes which spiralled to a greater or lesser extent; this explains continuous variation of axial angle found in several species and many anomalous features of flattened or partially flattened specimens. The effects of variation in thecal style along the stipe are distinguished from those produced by variable orientation of the rhabdosome during flattening and by later tectonic distortion. It is concluded that Dicellograptus probably lived with stipes pointing upward and that the rhabdosome rotated in a horizontal plane due to eddies created by the non-directional ciliary activity of radially dispersed zooids in order to improve feeding efficiency.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 118 , Issue 4 , July 1981 , pp. 401 - 408
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bulman, O. M. B. 1964. Lower Palaeozoic plankton Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 120, 455–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulman, O. M. B. 1970. Graptolithina. In Treatise on Invertebrate Palaeontology Pt. V (ed. Teichert, C.), xxxii + 1–163 (2nd Edition). Geol. Soc. America and University Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, W. 1858. Dumfriesshire graptolites, with descriptions of three new species Proc. R. phys. Soc. Edinb. 1, 466–70.Google Scholar
Crowther, P. R. & Rickards, R. B. 1977. Cortical bandages and the graptolite zooid. Geol. Palaeont., 11, 9–21.Google Scholar
Elles, G. L. & Wood, E. M. R. 1901–1918. Monograph of British Graptolites. Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.), CLXXI + 1–539.Google Scholar
Finney, S. C. 1979. Mode of life of planktonic graptolites: flotation structures in Ordovician Dicellograptus sp. Palaeobiology 5, 31–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, N. H. 1969. Some thoughts on the ecology, mode of life and evolution of the Graptolithina Proc. geol. Soc. Lond. 1659, 273–92.Google Scholar
Kirk, N. H. 1980. Controlling factors in the evolution of the graptolites Geol. Mag. 117, 277–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapworth, C. 1876. The Silurian system in the South of Scotland. In Catalogue of Western Scottish Fossils (ed. Armstrong, J. et al.). Prepared for the meeting of the British Association in Glasgow, 1876, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Rickards, R. B. 1975. Palaeoecology of the Graptolithina, an extinct class of the Phylum Hemichordata Biol. Rev. 50, 397–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickards, R. B. & Palmer, D. C. 1977. Early Ludlow monograptids with Devonian morphological affinities Lethaia 10, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toghill, P. 1970. Highest Ordovician (Hartfell Shales) graptolite faunas from the Moffat area, South Scotland Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.) 19, 1–26.Google Scholar
Urbanek, A. 1973. Organisation and evolution of graptolite colonies. In Animal Colonies, Development and Functions Through Time. (ed. Boardson, R. S. et al. , pp. 441–514. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc. Stroudsburg.Google Scholar