Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-hpxsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T17:31:37.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Right Choice at the Right Time: A Herding Experiment in Endogenous Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Daniel Sgroi*
Affiliation:
Churchill College & Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 9DE, UK

Abstract

Herding describes the phenomenon in decision-making where an economic agent disregards his own private information to follow the actions of his predecessors as in Banerjee (1992). With later decision-makers simply copying earlier decisions their private information cannot be inferred by other decision-makers and will be forever lost. There is some experimental evidence on simple sequential herding of this type in the literature, notably Anderson and Holt (1997). This paper differs by allowing subjects to delay their decision-making in order to benefit from observing others’ actions as in more recent herding models such as Chamley and Gale (1994). The results in this paper suggest that subjects will indeed delay when their private information is not sufficiently strong. Despite this ability to wait, as predicted in the theoretical literature, cascades remained ubiquitous and more worrying still, reverse-cascades occurred in which incorrect decisions made by early decision-makers produced informational cascades on the wrong action. In an alternative design, informing subjects that they had made incorrect choices only made matters worse as subjects moved further away from rational behavior.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 Economic Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allsopp, L. and Hey, J. (2000). “Two Experiments to Test a Model of Herd Behaviour.” Experimental Economics. 3, 121136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akerlof, G. and Yellen, J. (1987). “Rational Models of Irrational Behavior.” American Economic Review. 77, 137142.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. and Holt, C. (1997). “Information Cascades in the Laboratory.” American Economic Review. 87, 847862.Google Scholar
Banerjee, A.V. (1992). “A Simple Model of Herd Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 107, 797817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., and Welch, I. (1992). “A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades.” Journal of Political Economy. 100, 9921026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., and Welch, I. (1998). “Learning from the Behavior of Others: Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades.” Journal of Economic Perspectives. 12, 151170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bounmy, K., Vergnaud, J.-C., Willinger, M., and Ziegelmeyer, A. (1997). “Information Externalities and Mimetic Behavior with Endogenous Timing of Decisions: Theoretical Predictions and Experimental Evidence.” Working Paper, University Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Camerer, C. and Weigelt, K. (1991). “Information Mirages in Experimental Asset Markets.” Journal of Business. 64, 463493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamley, C. and Gale, D. (1994). “Information Revelation and Strategic Delay in a Model of Investment.” Econometrica. 108, 6074.Google Scholar
Gul, F. and Lundholm, R. (1995). “Endogenous Timing and the Clustering of Agents’ Decisions.” Journal of Political Economy. 103, 10391066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, A. and Plott, C. (2001). “Information Cascades: Replication and an Extension to Majority Rule and Conformity-Rewarding Institutions.” American Economic Review. 91, 15081520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sgroi, D. (2002). “Optimizing Information in the Herd: Guinea Pigs, Profits and Welfare.” Games and Economic Behavior. 39, 137166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, I. (1992). “Sequential Sales, Learning and Cascades.” Journal of Finance. 47, 695732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar