Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T03:31:38.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender differences in advice giving

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2025

Elif B. Osun Open the ORCID record for Elif B. Osun [Opens in a new window]
Elif B. Osun*
Affiliation:
Bates White Economic Consulting, Washington DC, USA
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I experimentally investigate whether there is a gender difference in advice giving in a gender-neutral task with varying difficulty in which the incentives of the sender and the receiver are perfectly aligned. I find that women are more reluctant to give advice compared to men for difficult questions. The gender difference in advice giving cannot be explained by gender differences in performance. Self-confidence explains some of the gender gap, but not all. The gender gap disappears if advice becomes enforceable. Introducing a model of guilt and responsibility, I discuss possible underlying mechanisms that are consistent with the findings.

Keywords

Gender differencesAdvice givingGroup decision makingExperimentsC72J16C90
Type
Original Paper
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , November 2024 , pp. 1068 - 1105
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Economic Science Association 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

I am extremely grateful to Emel Filiz-Ozbay for her time, encouragement, and advice on this project. I am thankful to Billur Aksoy, Ian Chadd, Katherine B. Coffman, Keaton Ellis, Seda Ertac, Yusufcan Masatlioglu, Yesim Orhun, Erkut Y. Ozbay, John Shea, Neslihan Uler, and Ece Yegane for their very helpful comments and suggestions. I also thank the editor, the co-editor, and two anonymous reviewers for their very constructive and helpful input. I gratefully acknowledge the research support provided by Behavioral and Social Sciences Dean's Research Initiative Award, University of Maryland, College Park. I would like to express my sincere appreciation to Bates White for the flexibility provided during the course of editing this paper. The opinions expressed represent only those of the author, and do not represent the views or opinions of Bates White, LLC or of other Bates White employees or affiliates.

The replication material for the study is available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SDFBE.

References

Babcock, L., Recalde, M.P., Vesterlund, L., & Weingart, L.. (2017). Gender differences in accepting and receiving requests for tasks with low promotability. American Economic Review, 107, (3, 714–47, 10.1257/aer.20141734.Google Scholar
Barber, B.M., & Odean, T.. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, (1, 261–292, 10.1162/003355301556400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartling, B., & Fischbacher, U.. (2012). Shifting the blame: On delegation and responsibility. The Review of Economic Studies, 79, (1, 67–87, 10.1093/restud/rdr023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battigalli, P., & Dufwenberg, M.. (2007). Guilt in games. American Economic Review, 97, (2, 170–176, 10.1257/aer.97.2.170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battigalli, P., Charness, G., & Dufwenberg, M.. (2013). Deception: The role of guilt. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 227–232, 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, S.. (1990). Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, (5, 960, 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohren, J.A., Imas, A., & Rosenberg, M.. (2019). The dynamics of discrimination: Theory and evidence. American economic review, 109, (10, 3395–3436, 10.1257/aer.20171829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, A., Ranehill, E., & Sandberg, A.. (2020). Gender and willingness to lead: Does the gender composition of teams matter?. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 104, 1–46.Google Scholar
Brandts, J., & Rott, C.. (2021). Advice from women and men and selection into competition. Journal of Economic Psychology, 82, 102333, 10.1016/j.joep.2020.102333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandts, J., Groenert, V., & Rott, C.. (2015). The impact of advice on women's and men's selection into competition. Management Science, 61, (5, 1018–1035, 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalyst, P. (2020). Women in s &p 500 companies. Available at SSRN 3239814Google Scholar
Çelen, B., Kariv, S., & Schotter, A.. (2010). An experimental test of advice and social learning. Management Science, 56, (10, 1687–1701, 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakraborty, P., Serra, D., et al. (2021). Gender and leadership in organizations: Promotions, demotions and angry workers. In: Working Papers 20210104–001Google Scholar
Charness, G., & Dufwenberg, M.. (2006). Promises and partnership. Econometrica, 74, (6, 1579–1601, 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00719.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, A., Schotter, A., & Sopher, B.. (2009). Talking ourselves to efficiency: Coordination in inter-generational minimum effort games with private, almost common and common knowledge of advice. The Economic Journal, 119, (534, 91–122, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02207.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, D.L., Schonger, M., & Wickens, C.. (2016). otree-an open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 88–97, 10.1016/j.jbef.2015.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J., & Houser, D.. (2019). When are women willing to lead? the effect of team gender composition and gendered tasks. The Leadership Quarterly, 30, (6), 101340, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffman, K., Flikkema, C.B., & Shurchkov, O.. (2021). Gender stereotypes in deliberation and team decisions. Games and Economic Behavior, 129, 329–349, 10.1016/j.geb.2021.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffman, K.B.. (2014). Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, (4, 1625–1660, 10.1093/qje/qju023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffman, K.B., Exley, C.L., & Niederle, M.. (2021). The role of beliefs in driving gender discrimination. Management Science, 67, (6, 3551–3569, 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, D.J., & Kagel, J.H.. (2016). A failure to communicate: An experimental investigation of the effects of advice on strategic play. European Economic Review, 82, 24–45, 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.10.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Bartolomeo, G., Martin, D., Papa, S., Laura, R., et al. (2022). Guilt aversion: Eve versus adam, In Guilt Aversion: Eve versus Adam.Google Scholar
Ding, T., & Schotter, A.. (2017). Matching and chatting: An experimental study of the impact of network communication on school-matching mechanisms. Games and Economic Behavior, 103, 94–115, 10.1016/j.geb.2016.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, T., & Schotter, A.. (2019). Learning and mechanism design: An experimental test of school matching mechanisms with intergenerational advice. The Economic Journal, 129, (623, 2779–2804, 10.1093/ej/uez024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, C.C., & Grossman, P.J.. (2008). Men, women and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. Handbook of experimental economics results, 1, 1061–1073, 10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00113-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erat, S.. (2013). Avoiding lying: The case of delegated deception. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 273–278, 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertac, S., & Gurdal, M.Y.. (2012). Deciding to decide: Gender, leadership and risk-taking in groups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83, (1, 24–30, 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskreis-Winkler, L., Milkman, K.L., Gromet, D.M., & Duckworth, A.L.. (2019). A large-scale field experiment shows giving advice improves academic outcomes for the advisor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, (30, 14808–14810, 10.1073/pnas.1908779116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Exley, C.L., & Kessler, J.B.. (2019). The gender gap in self-promotion, National Bureau of Economic Research: Technical report, 10.3386/w26345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneezy, U., & Potters, J.. (1997). An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, (2, 631–645, 10.1162/003355397555217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneezy, U., Saccardo, S., Serra-Garcia, M., & van Veldhuizen, R.. (2020). Bribing the self. Games and Economic Behavior, 120, 311–324, 10.1016/j.geb.2019.12.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heikensten, E., Isaksson, S. (2019). Simon says: Examining gender differences in advice seeking and influence in the lab. Available at SSRN 3273186Google Scholar
Hinnosaar, M.. (2019). Gender inequality in new media: Evidence from wikipedia. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 163, 262–276, 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.04.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, R., & Schotter, A.. (2008). Learning under supervision: an experimental study. Experimental Economics, 11, (2, 154–173, 10.1007/s10683-007-9164-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazear, E.P., & Rosen, S.. (1990). Male-female wage differentials in job ladders. Journal of Labor Economics, 8, (1, S106–S123, 10.1086/298246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manian, S., & Sheth, K.. (2021). Follow my lead: Assertive cheap talk and the gender gap. Management Science, 67, (11, 6880–6896, 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newson, R., et al. (2001). somersd-confidence intervals for nonparametric statistics and their differences. Stata Technical Bulletin, 10 (55)Google Scholar
Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L.. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? do men compete too much?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, (3, 1067–1101, 10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nihonsugi, T., Tanaka, T., & Haruno, M.. (2022). Gender differences in guilt aversion in korea and the united kingdom. Scientific Reports, 12, (1, 8187, 10.1038/s41598-022-12163-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyarko, Y., Schotter, A., & Sopher, B.. (2006). On the informational content of advice: A theoretical and experimental study. Economic Theory, 29, (2, 433–452, 10.1007/s00199-005-0037-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, R., & Vorsatz, M.. (2021). Simple guilt and cooperation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 82, 102347, 10.1016/j.joep.2020.102347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenhäusler, D., Schweizer, N., & Szech, N.. (2018). Guilt in voting and public good games. European Economic Review, 101, 664–681, 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schotter, A.. (2003). Decision making with naive advice. American Economic Review, 93, (2, 196–201, 10.1257/000282803321947047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, H., & Fishbach, A.. (2016). The pitfall of experimenting on the web: How unattended selective attrition leads to surprising (yet false) research conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, (4, 493, 10.1037/pspa0000056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Osun supplementary material

Osun supplementary material
Download Osun supplementary material(File)
File 4.4 MB