Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-2z2hb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-11T14:30:03.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eliciting Individual Discount Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Maribeth Coller  and
Melonie B. Williams
Maribeth Coller*
Affiliation:
School of Accounting, The Darla Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, (803) 777-6643
Melonie B. Williams*
Affiliation:
U. S. EPA, Office of Policy, 401 M St. SW, Mail Code 2172, Washington, DC 20460, (202) 260-7978
*
email: [email protected]
email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Controlled laboratory conditions using monetary incentives have been utilized in previous studies that examine individual discount rates, and researchers have found several apparently robust anomalies. We conjecture that subject behavior in these experiments may be affected by (uncontrolled) factors other than discount rates. We address some experimental design issues and report a new series of experiments designed to elicit individual discount rates. Our primary treatments include: (i) informing subjects of the annual and effective interest rates associated with alternative payment streams, and (ii) informing subjects of current market interest rates. We also test for the effect of real (vs. hypothetical) payments and for the effect of delaying both payment options (vs. offering an immediate payment option). The statistical analysis uses censored data techniques to account for the interactions between field and lab incentives. Each of the information treatments appears to reduce revealed discount rates. When both types of information are provided, annual rates in the interval of 15%—17.5% are revealed, whereas rates of 20%-25% are revealed in the control session. Each of the treatments also lowers the residual variance of subject responses.

Keywords

experimental economicsdiscount ratescensored dependent variable

JEL classification

C91: Laboratory, Individual Behavior D90: General‡
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , December 1999 , pp. 107 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Economic Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ainslie, G. and Haendel, V. (1982). “The Motives of Will.” In Gottheil, E., Druley, K., Skolda, T., and Waxman, H. (eds.), Etiologic Aspects of Alcohol and Drug Abuse. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Benzion, U., Rapoport, A., and Yagil, J. (1989). “Discount Rates Inferred from Decisions: An Experimental Study.” Management Science. 35, 270–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C.F. and Ho, T. (1994). “Violations of the Betweeness Axiom and Nonlinearity in Probability.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 8, 67–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, C.R. and Johnson, R.D. (1992). “Measuring Rate of Time Preference as a Function of Delay: An Experimental Study.” Unpublished Manuscript, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
Fisher, I. (1930). The Theory of Interest. New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
Gately, D. (1980). “Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-using Durables: Comment.” Bell Journal of Economics. 10, 373–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W.H. (1993). Econometric Analysis. New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. (1995). LIMDEP, Version 7.0: User's Manual. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software, Inc.Google Scholar
Hartman, R.S. and Doane, M.J. (1986). “Household Discount Rates Revisited.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 7, 139–148.Google Scholar
Hausman, J.A. (1979). “Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-using Durables.” Bell Journal of Economics. 10, 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holcomb, J.H. and Nelson, PS. (1992). “Another Experimental Look at Individual Time Preference.” Rationality and Society. 4, 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, J.K. (1991). “Discounting Money Payoffs: An Experimental Analysis.” Handbook of Behavioral Economics. 2B, 309–324.Google Scholar
Kirby, K.N. and Marakovic, N.N. (1996). “Delay-Discounting Probabilistic Rewards: Rates Decrease as Amounts Increase.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 3(1), 100–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrance, E.C. (1991). “Poverty and the Rate of Time Preference.” Journal of Political Economy. 99(1), 54–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazo, J.K., McClelland, G.H., and Schulze, W.D. (1992). “What is the Future Worth: An Experimental Examination of Rates of Time Preference.” Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Colorado at Boulder.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G.F. (1987). “Anticipation and the Valuation of Delayed Consumption.” Economic Journal. 97, 666–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, G.F. (1988). “Frames of Mind in Intertemporal Choice.” Management Science. 34, 200–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pender, J.L. (1996). “Discount Rates and Credit Markets: Theory and Evidence from Rural India.” Journal of Development Economics. 50, 257–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruderman, H., Levine, M., and McMahon, J. (1986). “Energy-Efficiency Choice in the Purchase of Residential Appliances.” In Kempton, Willett and Neiman, Max (eds.), Energy Efficiency: Perspectives on Individual Behavior. Washington, D.C.: American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.Google Scholar
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet. (1998). “Home-Grown Values and the Design of Incentive Compatible Auctions.” Journal of International Game Theory. 27, 427–441.Google Scholar
Shelley, M.K. (1993). “Outcome Signs, Question Frames and Discount Rates.” Management Science. 39, 806–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R.H. (1981). “Some Empirical Evidence on Dynamic Inconsistency.” Economics Letters. 8, 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagenaar, W. A. and Sagaria, S.D. (1975). “Misperception of Exponential Growth.” Perception and Psychophysics. 18(6), 416–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, G.C. and Woodbury, R.G. (1991). “Myopic Discounting: Empirical Evidence.” Handbook of Behavioral Economics. 2B, 325–342.Google Scholar