Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7tmb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T20:00:37.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hereditarily frequently hypercyclic operators and disjoint frequent hypercyclicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2025

FRÉDÉRIC BAYART
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Mathématiques Blaise Pascal UMR 6620 CNRS, Université Clermont Auvergne, Campus universitaire des Cézeaux, 3 place Vasarely, 63178 Aubière Cedex, France (e-mail: [email protected])
SOPHIE GRIVAUX
Affiliation:
Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8524 - Laboratoire Paul Painlevé, F-59000 Lille, France (e-mail: [email protected])
ÉTIENNE MATHERON
Affiliation:
Univ. Artois, UR 2462 - Laboratoire de Mathématiques de Lens (LML) F-62300 Lens, France (e-mail: [email protected])
QUENTIN MENET*
Affiliation:
Service d’Analyse fonctionnelle, Département de Mathématique, Université de Mons, Place du Parc 20, 7000 Mons, Belgium

Abstract

We introduce and study the notion of hereditary frequent hypercyclicity, which is a reinforcement of the well-known concept of frequent hypercyclicity. This notion is useful for the study of the dynamical properties of direct sums of operators; in particular, a basic observation is that the direct sum of a hereditarily frequently hypercyclic operator with any frequently hypercyclic operator is frequently hypercyclic. Among other results, we show that operators satisfying the frequent hypercyclicity criterion are hereditarily frequently hypercyclic, as well as a large class of operators whose unimodular eigenvectors are spanning with respect to the Lebesgue measure. However, we exhibit two frequently hypercyclic weighted shifts $B_w,B_{w'}$ on $c_0(\mathbb {Z}_+)$ whose direct sum ${B_w\oplus B_{w'}}$ is not $\mathcal {U}$-frequently hypercyclic (so that neither of them is hereditarily frequently hypercyclic), and we construct a C-type operator on $\ell _p(\mathbb {Z}_+)$, $1\le p<\infty $, which is frequently hypercyclic but not hereditarily frequently hypercyclic. We also solve several problems concerning disjoint frequent hypercyclicity: we show that for every $N\in \mathbb {N}$, any disjoint frequently hypercyclic N-tuple of operators $(T_1,\ldots ,T_N)$ can be extended to a disjoint frequently hypercyclic $(N+1)$-tuple $(T_1,\ldots ,T_N, T_{N+1})$ as soon as the underlying space supports a hereditarily frequently hypercyclic operator; we construct a disjoint frequently hypercyclic pair which is not densely disjoint hypercyclic; and we show that the pair $(D,\tau _a)$ is disjoint frequently hypercyclic, where D is the derivation operator acting on the space of entire functions and $\tau _a$ is the operator of translation by $a\in \mathbb {C}\setminus \{ 0\}$. Part of our results are in fact obtained in the general setting of Furstenberg families.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agneessens, K.. Frequently hypercyclic random vectors. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 151 (2023), 11031117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albiac, F. and Kalton, N. J.. Topics in Banach Space Theory. Springer, New York, 2006.Google Scholar
Ansari, S. I.. Hypercyclic and cyclic vectors. J. Funct. Anal. 128 (1995), 374383.Google Scholar
Badea, C. and Grivaux, S.. Unimodular eigenvalues, uniformly distributed sequences and linear dynamics. Adv. Math. 211 (2007), 766793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayart, F. and Grivaux, S.. Frequently hypercyclic operators. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (2006), 50835117.Google Scholar
Bayart, F. and Grivaux, S.. Invariant Gaussian measures for operators on Banach spaces and linear dynamics. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 94 (2007), 181210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayart, F. and Matheron, É.. Dynamics of Linear Operators (Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 179). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009.Google Scholar
Bayart, F. and Matheron, É.. Mixing operators and small subsets of the circle. J. Reine Angew. Math. 715 (2016), 75123.Google Scholar
Bayart, F. and Ruzsa, I.. Difference sets and frequently hypercyclic weighted shifts. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 35 (2015), 691709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernal-González, L.. Disjoint hypercyclic operators. Studia Math. 182(2) (2007), 113131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bès, J. P., Menet, Q., Peris, A. and Puig, Y.. Recurrence properties of hypercyclic operators. Math. Ann. 366 (2016), 545572.Google Scholar
Bès, J. P., Menet, Q., Peris, A. and Puig, Y.. Strong transitivity properties for operators. J. Differential Equations 266 (2019), 13131337.Google Scholar
Bès, J. P. and Peris, A.. Hereditarily hypercyclic operators. J. Funct. Anal. 167 (1999), 94112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bès, J. P. and Peris, A.. Disjointness in hypercyclicity. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 336 (2007). 297315.Google Scholar
Blum, J. R. and Hanson, D. L.. On the mean ergodic theorem for subsequences. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 66 (1960), 308311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla, A. and Grosse-Erdmann, K.-G.. Frequently hypercyclic operators and vectors. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 27 (2007), 383404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla, A. and Grosse-Erdmann, K.-G.. Upper frequent hypercyclicity and related notions. Rev. Mat. Complut. 31 (2018), 673711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardeccia, R. and Muro, S.. Frequently recurrent backward shifts. Preprint, 2024, arXiv:2407.11799.Google Scholar
Conway, J. B.. A Course in Functional Analysis (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 96). Springer, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Conze, J.-P.. Convergence des moyennes ergodiques pour des sous-suites. Mém. Soc. Math. Fr. (N.S.) 35 (1973), 715.Google Scholar
Cornfeld, I. P., Fomin, S. V. and Sinai, Ya. G.. Ergodic Theory (Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 245). Springer, New York, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Rosa, M., Frerick, L., Grivaux, S. and Peris, A.. Frequent hypercyclicity, chaos, and unconditional Schauder decompositions. Israel J. Math. 190 (2012), 389399.Google Scholar
De la Rosa, M. and Read, C.. A hypercyclic operator whose direct sum ${T}\oplus {T}$ is not hypercyclic. J. Operator Theory 61 (2009), 369380.Google Scholar
Ernst, R., Esser, C. and Menet, Q.. $\mathcal{U}$ -frequent hypercyclicity notions and related weighted densities. Israel J. Math. 241 (2021), 817848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furstenberg, H., Disjointness in ergodic theory, minimal sets, and a problem in Diophantine approximation. Math. Systems Theory 1 (1967), 149.Google Scholar
Glasner, E.. Classifying dynamical systems by their recurrence properties. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 24 (2004), 2140.Google Scholar
Grivaux, S.. Hypercyclic operators, mixing operators and the bounded steps problem. J. Operator Theory 54 (2005), 147168.Google Scholar
Grivaux, S.. A probabilistic version of the frequent hypercyclicity criterion. Studia Math. 176 (2006), 279290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grivaux, S.. A new class of frequently hypercyclic operators. Indiana Univ. Math. Math. J. 60 (2011), 11771201.Google Scholar
Grivaux, S. and Matheron, É.. Invariant measures for frequently hypercyclic operators. Adv. Math. 265 (2014) 371427 Google Scholar
Grivaux, S., Matheron, É. and Menet, Q.. Linear dynamical systems on Hilbert spaces: typical properties and explicit examples. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 269 (2021), 147 pp.Google Scholar
Grosse-Erdmann, K.. Frequently hypercyclic bilateral weighted shifts. Glasg. Math. J. 61 (2019), 271286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosse-Erdmann, K. and Peris, A., Linear Chaos (Universitext). Springer, London, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, S., Gaussian Hilbert Spaces (Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 129). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledoux, M. and Talagrand, M.. Probability in Banach Spaces (Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 23). Springer, Berlin, 1991.Google Scholar
Martin, Ö., Menet, Q. and Puig, Y.. Disjoint frequently hypercyclic pseudo-shifts. J. Funct. Anal. 283 (2022), 109474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Ö. and Puig, Y.. Existence of disjoint frequently hypercyclic operators which fail to be disjoint weakly mixing. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 500 (2021), 125106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Ö. and Sanders, R.. Disjoint supercyclic weighted shifts. Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 85 (2016), 191220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Ö. and Sanders, R., Extending families of disjoint hypercyclic operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 539 (2024), 128539 Google Scholar
Maurey, B. and Pisier, G.. Séries de variables aléatoires vectorielles indépendantes et propriétés géométriques des espaces de Banach. Studia Math. 58 (1976), 4590.Google Scholar
Menet, Q.. Linear chaos and frequent hypercyclicity. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 369 (2017), 49774994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menet, Q.. Inverse of frequently hypercyclic operators. J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 21 (2022), 18671886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moothathu, T. K. S.. Two remarks on frequent hypercyclicity. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 408 (2013), 843845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo-Arcila, M. and Peris, A.. Strong mixing measures for linear operators and frequent hypercyclicity. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 398 (2013), 462465.Google Scholar
Newton, D. and Parry, W.. On a factor automorphism of a normal dynamical system. Ann. Math. Statist. 37 (1966), 15281533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, M. and Petersen, K.. Ergodic theory: basic examples and constructions. Mathematics of Complexity and Dynamical Systems. Ed. R. A. Meyers. Springer, New York, 2012, pp. 264288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, W.. Topics in Ergodic Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1981.Google Scholar
Peller, V.. Hankel Operators and Their Applications (Springer Monographs in Mathematics). Springer, New York, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queffélec, M., Substitution Dynamical Systems Spectral Analysis (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1294). 2nd edn. Springer, 2010.Google Scholar
Read, C. J.. The invariant subspace problem for a class of Banach spaces. II. Hypercyclic operators. Israel J. Math. 63 (1988), 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, R. and Shkarin, S.. Existence of disjoint weakly mixing operators that fail to satisfy the Disjoint Hypercyclicity Criterion. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 417 (2014), 834855.Google Scholar
Shkarin, S.. Universal elements for nonlinear operators and their applications. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 348 (2008), 193210.Google Scholar
Shkarin, S.. On the spectrum of frequently hypercyclic operators. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 137 (2009), 123134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shkarin, S.. A short proof of existence of disjoint hypercyclic operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 367 (2010), 713715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szőkefalvi-Nagy, B., Foias, C., Bercovici, H. and Kérchy, L.. Harmonic Analysis of Operators on Hilbert Space. Springer, New York, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbański, M., Roy, M. and Munday, S.. Non-invertible Dynamical Systems. Vol. 1. De Gruyter, Berlin, 2022.Google Scholar
Walters, P.. An Introduction to Ergodic Theory (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 79). Springer, Berlin, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar