Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T09:24:41.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ternary geopolymer with calcined halloysite: impact on mechanical properties and microstructure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 December 2024

Ting Yu
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China CAS Key Laboratory of Mineralogy and Metallogeny/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Mineral Physics and Materials, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Institutions of Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China
Baifa Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
Jiarong Chen
Affiliation:
CAS Key Laboratory of Mineralogy and Metallogeny/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Mineral Physics and Materials, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Institutions of Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China
Mohammad Fahimizadeh
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
Thammaros Pantongsuk
Affiliation:
CAS Key Laboratory of Mineralogy and Metallogeny/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Mineral Physics and Materials, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Institutions of Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China
Xiang Zhou
Affiliation:
Jewelry Institute, Guangzhou Panyu Polytechnic, Guangzhou, China
Peng Yuan*
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
*
Corresponding author: Peng Yuan; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

As a natural clay mineral, halloysite (Hal) possesses a distinctive nanotubular morphology and surface reactivity. Hal calcined at 750°C (Hal750°C; 0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0 wt.%) was used to replace ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS; 50.0, 49.5, 49.0, 48.0, 47.0, 46.0 wt.%) and fly ash (FA; 50.0, 49.5, 49.0, 48.0, 47.0, 46.0 wt.%) for the preparation of geopolymer in this study. The effects of the replacement ratio of Hal750°C on setting time, compressive strength, flexural strength, chemical composition and microstructure of the geopolymer were investigated. The results indicated that Hal750°C did not significantly alter the setting time. The active SiO2 and Al2O3 generated from Hal750°C participated in the geopolymerization, forming additional geopolymer gel phases (calcium (aluminate) silica hydrate and sodium aluminosilicate hydrate), improving the 28 day compressive strength of the geopolymers. When the amount of Hal750°C was 2.0 wt.%, the 28 day compressive strength of the ternary (GGBFS-FA-Hal750°C-based) geopolymer was 72.9 MPa, 34.8% higher than that of the geopolymer without the addition of Hal750°C. The special nanotubular morphology of residual Hal750°C mainly acted like reinforcing fibres, supplementing the flexural strength of the geopolymer. However, excessive Hal750°C addition (>4.0 wt.%) reduced compressive and flexural strength values due to the low degrees of geopolymerization and the porous microstructure in the ternary geopolymer. These findings demonstrate that the appropriate addition of Hal750°C improved the compressive strength of geopolymers prepared using GGBFS/FA, which provides essential data for future research and supports the utilization of low-value Hal-containing clays in geopolymer preparation.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abdalqader, A.F., Jin, F. & Al-Tabbaa, A. (2016) Development of greener alkali-activated cement: utilization of sodium carbonate for activating slag and fly ash mixtures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 6675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiken, T.A., Kwasny, J., Sha, W. & Tong, K.T. (2021) Mechanical and durability properties of alkali-activated fly ash concrete with increasing slag content. Construction and Building Materials, 301, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoni, M., Rossen, J., Martirena, F. & Scrivener, K. (2012) Cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and limestone. Cement and Concrete Research, 42, 15791589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASTM C191 (2019) Standard test methods for time of setting of hydraulic cement by Vicat Needle. Available at https://www.astm.org/c0191-19.htmlGoogle Scholar
ASTM C618-19 (2019) Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. Available at https://www.astm.org/c0618-19.htmlGoogle Scholar
Aziz, I.H., Abdullah, M.M.A.B., Mohd Salleh, M.A.A., Azimi, E.A., Chaiprapa, J. & Sandu, A.V. (2020) Strength development of solely ground granulated blast furnace slag geopolymers. Construction and Building Materials, 250, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrie, E., Cappuyns, V., Vassilieva, E., Adriaens, R., Hollanders, S., Garcés, D. et al. (2015) Potential of inorganic polymers (geopolymers) made of halloysite and volcanic glass for the immobilization of tailings from gold extraction in Ecuador. Applied Clay Science, 109110, 95106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belmokhtar, N., Ayadi, H.E., Ammari, M. & Allal, L.B. (2018) Effect of structural and textural properties of a ceramic industrial sludge and kaolin on the hardened geopolymer properties. Applied Clay Science, 162, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernal, S.A., Provis, J., Rose, V. & Gutierrez, R.M.D. (2011) Evolution of binder structure in sodium silicate-activated slag–metakaolin blends. Cement and Concrete Composites, 33, 4654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bignozzi, M.C., Manzi, S., Natali, M.E., Rickard, W.D.A. & van Riessen, A. (2014) Room temperature alkali activation of fly ash: The effect of Na2O/SiO2 ratio. Construction and Building Materials, 69, 262270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouguermouh, K., Bouzidi, N., Mahtout, L., Pérez-Villarejo, L. & Martínez-Cartas, M.L. (2017) Effect of acid attack on microstructure and composition of metakaolin-based geopolymers: the role of alkaline activator. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 463, 128137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouha, E.M., Bonnet, S., Khelidj, A., Leklou, N., Froelich, D., Babah, I.A. et al. (2022) Compensation of the negative effects of micro-encapsulated phase change materials by incorporating metakaolin in geopolymers based on blast furnace slag. Construction and Building Materials, 314, .Google Scholar
Calvino, M.M., Lisuzzo, L., Cavallaro, G., Lazzara, G. & Milioto, S. (2022) Halloysite based geopolymers filled with wax microparticles as sustainable building materials with enhanced thermo-mechanical performances. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 10, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çankaya, N., Ünal, A. & Korcan, S.E. (2024) Comparison of the antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of halloysite nanotubes and organoclays as green source materials. Clay Minerals, 59, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaud, G., Rozière, E., Martinage, O., Loukili, A. & Deneele, D. (2021) Calcined clay–limestone cements: hydration processes with high and low-grade kaolinite clays. Construction and Building Materials, 277, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, M. & Huang, R. (2013) Binding mechanism and properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 40, 291298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cong, P. & Mei, L. (2021) Using silica fume for improvement of fly ash/slag based geopolymer activated with calcium carbide residue and gypsum. Construction and Building Materials, 275, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, P., Yan, C. & Wei, Z. (2016) Influence of partial replacement of fly ash by metakaolin on mechanical properties and microstructure of fly ash geopolymer paste exposed to sulfate attack. Ceramics International, 42, 35043517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, P., Yan, C. & Wei, Z. (2017) A novel water permeable geopolymer with high strength and high permeability coefficient derived from fly ash, slag and metakaolin. Advanced Powder Technology, 28, 14301434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duxson, P. & Provis, J.L. (2008) Designing precursors for geopolymer cements. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 91, 38643869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahimizadeh, M., Wong, L.W., Baifa, Z., Sadjadi, S., Auckloo, S.A.B., Palaniandy, K. et al. (2024) Halloysite clay nanotubes: innovative applications by smart systems. Applied Clay Science, 251, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farzadnia, N., Abang Ali, A.A., Demirboga, R. & Anwar, M.P. (2013) Effect of halloysite nano-clay on mechanical properties, thermal behavior and microstructure of cement mortars. Cement and Concrete Research, 48, 97104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Lodeiro, I., Fernández-Jiménez, A., Blanco, M.T. & Palomo, A. (2008) FTIR study of the sol–gel synthesis of cementitious gels: C-S-H and N-A-S-H. Journal of Sol–Gel Science and Technology, 45, 6372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, H., Zhang, B., Deng, L., Yuan, P., Li, M. & Wang, Q. (2021) Preparation of high-performance silico-aluminophosphate geopolymers using fly ash and metakaolin as raw materials. Applied Clay Science, 204, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajimohammadi, A., Provis, J.L. & Deventer, J.S.J.V. (2008) One-part geopolymer mixes from geothermal silica and sodium aluminate. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 47, 93969405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, A., Arif, M. & Shariq, M. (2019) Use of geopolymer concrete for a cleaner and sustainable environment – a review of mechanical properties and microstructure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223, 704728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W. & Wang, H. (2021) Geopolymer pervious concrete modified with granulated blast furnace slag: microscale characterization and mechanical strength. Journal of Cleaner Production, 328, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huseien, G.F., Mirza, J., Ismail, M., Ghoshal, S.K. & Ariffin, M. (2016a) Effect of metakaolin replaced granulated blast furnace slag on fresh and early strength properties of geopolymer mortar. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9, 15571566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huseien, G.F., Mirza, J., Ismail, M. & Hussin, M.W. (2016b) Influence of different curing temperatures and alkali activators on properties of GBFS geopolymer mortars containing fly ash and palm-oil fuel ash. Construction and Building Materials, 125, 12291240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huseien, G.F., Sam, A.R.M., Mirza, J., Tahir, M.M., Asaad, M.A., Ismail, M. & Shah, K.W. (2018) Waste ceramic powder incorporated alkali-activated mortars exposed to elevated temperatures: performance evaluation. Construction and Building Materials, 187, 307317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishwarya, G., Singh, B., Deshwal, S. & Bhattacharyya, S.K. (2019) Effect of sodium carbonate/sodium silicate activator on the rheology, geopolymerization and strength of fly ash/slag geopolymer pastes. Cement and Concrete Composites, 97, 226238.Google Scholar
Ismail, I., Bernal, S.A., Provis, J.L., Nicolas, R.S., Hamdan, S. & Deventer, J.V. (2014) Modification of phase evolution in alkali-activated blast furnace slag by the incorporation of fly ash. Cement and Concrete Composites, 45, 125135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juenger, M.G.G., Snellings, R. & Bernal, S.A. (2019) Supplementary cementitious materials: new sources, characterization, and performance insights. Cement and Concrete Research, 122, 257273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaze, C.R., Nana, A., Lecomte-Nana, G.L., Deutou, J.G.N., Kamseu, E., Melo, U.C. et al. (2022) Thermal behaviour and microstructural evolution of metakaolin and meta-halloysite-based geopolymer binders: a comparative study. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 147, 20552071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kljajević, L.M., Nenadović, S.S., Nenadović, M.T., Bundaleski, N.K., Todorović, B.Ž., Pavlović, V.B. & Rakočević, Z.L. (2017) Structural and chemical properties of thermally treated geopolymer samples. Ceramics International, 43, 67006708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, D. & Sanjayan, J.G. (2008) Damage behavior of geopolymer composites exposed to elevated temperatures. Cement and Concrete Composites, 30, 986991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kranzlein, E., Pollmann, H. & Krcmar, W. (2018) Metal powders as foaming agents in fly ash based geopolymer synthesis and their impact on the structure depending on the Na/Al ratio. Cement and Concrete Composites, 90, 161168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, N.K. & Lee, H.K. (2013) Setting and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag concrete manufactured at room temperature. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 12011209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, W. & Deventer, J.V. (2003) Use of infrared spectroscopy to study geopolymerization of heterogeneous amorphous aluminosilicates. Langmuir, 19, 87268734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., Luo, R., Qin, L., Liu, H., Duan, P., Jing, W. et al. (2022) High temperature properties of graphene oxide modified metakaolin based geopolymer paste. Cement and Concrete Composites, 125, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Li, J., Cui, J., Shan, Y. & Niu, Y. (2021) Experimental study on calcium carbide residue as a combined activator for coal gangue geopolymer and feasibility for soil stabilization. Construction and Building Materials, 312, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liew, Y.M., Heah, C.Y., Mohd, M.A.B. & Kamarudin, H. (2016) Structure and properties of clay-based geopolymer cements: a review. Progress in Materials Science, 83, 595629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ling, Y., Wang, K., Li, W., Shi, G. & Lu, P. (2019) Effect of slag on the mechanical properties and bond strength of fly ash-based engineered geopolymer composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 164, 747757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, D.M. (2011) Research on application of phosphorus slag in cement. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 117119, 14371440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lv, Y.G., Pan, B., Han, W.W., Qiao, J., Zhang, B., Zhang, J.H. & Peng, H. (2024) Carbonation resistance of fly ash–metakaolin-based geopolymer pastes regulated by slag and carbide slag. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 13, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marjanović, N., Komljenović, M., Baščarević, Z., Nikolić, V. & Petrović, R. (2015) Physical–mechanical and microstructural properties of alkali-activated fly ash–blast furnace slag blends. Ceramics International, 41, 14211435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathivet, V., Jouin, J., Gharzouni, A., Sobrados, I., Celerier, H., Rossignol, S. & Parlier, M. (2019) Acid-based geopolymers: understanding of the structural evolutions during consolidation and after thermal treatments. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 512, 9097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mourak, A. & Hajjaji, M. (2024) Moroccan heated clay-based geopolymer reinforced with date palm cellulose: microstructure characterization and mechanical/physical properties. Clay Minerals, 59, 5062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nana, A., Tchummegne, I.K., Tome, S., Adesina, A., Alomayri, T., Singla, R. et al. (2024) Comparison of feldspar and meta-halloysite geopolymers by alkaline and acidic activation. Construction and Building Materials, 424, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nath, P. & Sarker, P.K. (2014) Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Construction and Building Materials, 66, 163171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neißer-Deiters, A., Scherb, S., Beuntner, N. & Thienel, K.C. (2019) Influence of the calcination temperature on the properties of a mica mineral as a suitability study for the use as SCM. Applied Clay Science, 179, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neto, A.A.M., Cincotto, M.A. & Repette, W. (2008) Drying and autogenous shrinkage of pastes and mortars with activated slag cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 38, 565574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, W., Zhang, R., He, Z., Zhou, J., Wu, M., Xu, Z. et al. (2020) Research progress on leaching technology and theory of weathered crust elution-deposited rare earth ore. Hydrometallurgy, 193, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolov, A., Nugteren, H., Petrov, O., Rostovsky, I., Petrova, T. & Delcheva, Z. (2019) Synthesis of natural zeolite agglomerates: clinoptilolite-based geopolymers through aluminate activation. Clay Minerals, 54, 393400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogundiran, M.B. & Kumar, S. (2016) Synthesis of fly ash-calcined clay geopolymers: reactivity, mechanical strength, structural and microstructural characteristics. Construction and Building Materials, 125, 450457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivia, M. & Nikraz, H. (2012) Properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete designed by Taguchi method. Materials and Design, 36, 191198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ounissi, C., Mahmoudi, S., Valentini, L., Bennour, A., Garbin, E., Artioli, G. & Montacer, M. (2020) Potential use of Kebilian clay reserves (southern Tunisia) for the production of geopolymer materials. Clay Minerals, 55, 101111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phoo-Ngernkham, T., Maegawa, A., Mishima, N., Hatanaka, S. & Chindaprasirt, P. (2015) Effects of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate solutions on compressive and shear bond strengths of FA–GBFS geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials, 91, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasanphan, S., Wannagon, A., Kobayashi, T. & Jiemsirilers, S. (2019) Reaction mechanisms of calcined kaolin processing waste-based geopolymers in the presence of low alkali activator solution. Construction and Building Materials, 221, 409420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankar, K., Stynoski, P., Al-Chaar, G.K. & Kriven, W.M. (2018) Sodium silicate activated slag-fly ash binders: part I – processing, microstructure, and mechanical properties. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 101, 22282244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scrivener, K., Zunino, F., Avet, F., Ston, J., Maraghechi, H., Hanpongpun, W. & Favier, A. (2019) Impacting factors and properties of limestone calcined clay cements (LC3). Green Material, 7, 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, B. & Mackinnon, I.D.R. (1996) Experimental transformation of kaolinite to halloysite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 44, 825834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snellings, R. (2016) Assessing, understanding and unlocking supplementary cementitious materials. RILEM Technical Letters, 1, 5055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, W., Zhu, Z., Pu, S., Wan, Y. & Hu, L. (2020) Multi-technical characterization and correlations between properties of standard cured alkali-activated high-calcium FA binders with GGBS as additive. Construction and Building Materials, 241, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, X., Liu, J., Qiu, J., Wu, P. & Zhao, Y. (2022) Alkali activation of blast furnace slag using a carbonate-calcium carbide residue alkaline mixture to prepare cemented paste backfill. Construction and Building Materials, 320, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trezza, M.A. & Lavat, A.E. (2001) Analysis of the system 3CaO·Al2O3–CaSO4·2H2O–CaCO3–H2O by FT-IR spectroscopy. Cement and Concrete Research, 31, 869872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasić, M.V., Jantunen, H., Mijatović, N., Nelo, M. & Muñoz Velasco, P. (2023) Influence of coal ashes on fired clay brick quality: random forest regression and artificial neural networks modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 407, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, A., Zheng, Y., Zhang, Z., Liu, K., Li, Y., Shi, L. & Sun, D. (2020) The durability of alkali-activated materials in comparison with ordinary portland cements and concretes: a review. Engineering, 6, 695706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, T., Zhu, H., Zhang, Z., Gao, X., Zhang, C. & Wu, Q. (2018) Effect of fly ash microsphere on the rheology and microstructure of alkali-activated fly ash/slag pastes. Cement and Concrete Research, 109, 198207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youmoue, M., Fongang, R.T.T., Gharzouni, A., Kaze, R.C., Kamseu, E., Sglavo, V.M., Kenfack, I.T., Nait-Ali, B. & Rossignol, S. (2020) Effect of silica and lignocellulosic additives on the formation and the distribution of meso and macropores in foam metakaolin-based geopolymer filters for dyes and wastewater filtration. SN Applied Sciences, 2, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, T., Chen, J., Guo, H., Zhang, B., He, X., Zheng, A. et al. (2023a) Mechanical properties and microstructure of ground granulated blast furnace slag-based geopolymer reinforced with polyvinyl alcohol fibers. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 25, 17191731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, T., Zhang, B., Guo, H., Wang, Q., Liu, D., Chen, J. & Yuan, P. (2023b) Calcined nanosized tubular halloysite for the preparation of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3). Applied Clay Science, 232, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, T., Zhang, B., Yuan, P., Guo, H., Liu, D., Chen, J. et al. (2023c) Optimization of mechanical performance of limestone calcined clay cement: effects of calcination temperature of nanosized tubular halloysite, gypsum content, and water/binder ratio. Construction and Building Materials, 389, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, B., Chen, W., Zhao, J., Li, L., Liu, F., Guo, Y. & Zhang, B. (2022) Addition of alkaline solutions and fibers for the reinforcement of kaolinite-containing granite residual soil. Applied Clay Science, 228, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, B., Liang, J., Li, X., Zhang, B., Luo, Q., Sabri, S.M.M. et al. (2024) Sustainable utilization of clay minerals-rich engineering muck via alkali-activation: optimization of pore structure by thermal treatment. Applied Clay Science, 258, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, P. (2016) Thermal-treatment-induced deformations and modifications of halloysite. Pp. 137166 in: Nanosized Tubular Clay Minerals: Halloysite and Imogolite (Yuan, P., Thill, A. & Bergaya, F., editors). Developments in Clay Science, Vol. 7. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Yuan, P., Tan, D., Annabi-Bergaya, F., Yan, W., Fan, M., Liu, D. & He, H. (2012) Changes in structure, morphology, porosity, and surface activity of mesoporous halloysite nanotubes under heating. Clays and Clay Minerals, 60, 561573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yue, C. (2021) Low-carbon binders produced from waste glass and low-purity metakaolin for cemented paste backfill. Construction and Building Materials, 312, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, B., Guo, H., Yuan, P., Li, Y., Wang, Q., Deng, L. & Liu, D. (2020) Geopolymerization of halloysite via alkali-activation: dependence of microstructures on precalcination. Applied Clay Science, 185, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, B., Yu, T., Guo, H., Chen, J., Liu, Y. & Yuan, P. (2023) Effect of the SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio on the microstructure and properties of clay-based geopolymers: a comparative study of kaolinite-based and halloysite-based geopolymers. Clays and Clay Minerals, 70, 882902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, B., Yuan, P., Guo, H., Deng, L., Li, Y., Li, L. et al. (2021) Effect of curing conditions on the microstructure and mechanical performance of geopolymers derived from nanosized tubular halloysite. Construction and Building Materials, 268, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P., Zheng, Y., Wang, K. & Zhang, J. (2018) A review on properties of fresh and hardened geopolymer mortar. Composites Part B: Engineering, 152, 7995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Hao, W., Zhu, Y., Reid, A. & Bullen, F. (2014) Using fly ash to partially substitute metakaolin in geopolymer synthesis. Applied Clay Science, 88–89, 194201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Provis, J.L., Wang, H., Bullen, F. & Reid, A. (2013) Quantitative kinetic and structural analysis of geopolymers. Part 2. Thermodynamics of sodium silicate activation of metakaolin. Thermochimica Acta, 565, 163171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Wang, H., Provis, J.L., Bullen, F., Reid, A. & Zhu, Y. (2012a) Quantitative kinetic and structural analysis of geopolymers. Part 1. The activation of metakaolin with sodium hydroxide. Thermochimica Acta, 539, 2333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Wang, H., Yao, X. & Zhu, Y. (2012b) Effects of halloysite in kaolin on the formation and properties of geopolymers. Cement and Concrete Composites, 34, 709715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Xiao, Y., Huajun, Z. & Yue, C. (2009) Role of water in the synthesis of calcined kaolin-based geopolymer. Applied Clay Science, 43, 218223.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Zhu, Y., Zhu, H., Zhang, Y., Provis, J.L. & Wang, H. (2019) Effect of drying procedures on pore structure and phase evolution of alkali-activated cements. Cement and Concrete Composites, 96, 194203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, H., Liang, G., Li, H., Wu, Q. & Hua, S. (2021) Insights to the sulfate resistance and microstructures of alkali-activated metakaolin/slag pastes. Applied Clay Science, 202, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zunino, F. & Scrivener, K. (2021) The reaction between metakaolin and limestone and its effect in porosity refinement and mechanical properties. Cement and Concrete Research, 140, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar