Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T22:00:21.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The incidence and risk factors of fetuses with mirror-image dextrocardia with solitus inversus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2024

Wenjiao Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Ultrasound, Xi’an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Yajuan Wei
Affiliation:
Department of Ultrasound, Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Xinru Gao
Affiliation:
Department of Ultrasound, Northwest Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Xiaoxue Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Ultrasound, Northwest Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Liping Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Ultrasound, Xi’an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Wenlian Gao
Affiliation:
Department of Ultrasound, Xi’an Angel Women’s & Children’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Xumin Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Ultrasound, Xi’an Angel Women’s & Children’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Baomin Liu*
Affiliation:
Department of Ultrasound, Xi’an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China Department of Ultrasound, Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
*
Corresponding author: Baomin Liu; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

This research seeks to ascertain the prevalence and determinants of mirror-image dextrocardia in fetuses

Study design:

With December 2022 as the reference point, we compiled colleted data on pregnant women who carried fetuses with mirror-image dextrocardia in Xi’an, Shaanxi Province: September–October 2022, November 2022, and December 2022–January 2023. An online questionnaire was distributed to 209 pregnant across China who had contracted COVID-19. The case group comprised women whose final menstrual cycle occurred in November 2022 and who had a fetus with mirror-image dextrocardia. Women with a November 2022 final menstrual period and a fetus without this condition made up the control group. To identify the risk factors associated with fetal mirror-image dextrocardia, both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed.

Results:

A significant difference was noted in the gestational age at COVID-19 infection women with a September to October 2022 and December 2022 to January 2023 final menstrual period who did not bear a fetus with mirror-image dextrocardia, and those with a November 2022 final menstrual period whose fetus exhibited this condition. The univariate and multivariate analyses conducted on pregnant women with a final menstrual period in November 2022 who had contracted COVID-19 revealed significant differences in the presence and duration of fever between those bearing fetuses with mirror-image dextrocardia and those without (P = 0.000).

Conclusion:

The findings suggest two critical factors to the increased prevalence of fetal mirror-image dextrocardia: 1) the infection timing which occurs between the 4th and 6th week of pregnancy and 2) the presence of fever and its prolonged duration.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Koc, A, Anaesthesia recommendations for situs inversus totalis. (2020), Available: https://www.orpha.net/data/patho/Ans/en/Situs-inversus-totalis.pdf.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, S, Demirtas, A, Tokpinar, A, Niyazi, A. Dextrocardia and situs inversus totalis in a turkish subject: a case report. Int J Morphol 2019; 37: 900902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boon, M, Smits, A, Cuppens, H et al. Primary ciliary dyskinesia: critical evaluation of clinical symptoms and diagnosis in pa- tients with normal and abnormal ultrastructure. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2014; 9: 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, C, Lablans, M, Ataian, M et al. An international registry for primary ciliary dyskinesia. Eur Respir J 2016; 47: 849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ajayi, N, Lazarus, L, Satyapal, KS. Penetrating chest injury in a case of situs inversus totalis. IJAE 2019, 124: 5864.Google Scholar
Zhu, Y, Chen, Y, Feng, Y, Yu, D, Mo, X. Association between maternal body mass index and congenital heart defects in infants: a meta-analysis. Congenit Heart Dis 2018; 13: 271281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tennant, PW, Pearce, MS, Bythell, M, Rankin, J. 20-year survival of children born with congenital anomalies: a population-based study. Lancet 2010; 375: 649656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, QM, Ma, XJ, Ge, XL, et al. Neonatal congenital heart disease screening group. Pulse oximetry with clinical assessment to screen for congenital heart disease in neonates in China: a prospective study. Lancet 2014; 384: 747754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzik, TJ, Mohiddin, SA, Dimarco, A. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system: implications for risk assessment, diagnosis, and treatment options. Cardiovasc Res 2020; 116: 16661687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Society of Cardiology. ESC guidance for the diagnosis and management of CV disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. Available at: https://www.escardio.org/Education/COVID-19-and-Cardiology/ESC-COVID-19-Guidance. Accessed 17 Jun 2020.Google Scholar
Wu, Z, McGoogan, JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72314 cases from the chinese center for disease control and prevention. JAMA 2020; 323: 12391242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelb, BD, Chung, WK. Complex genetics and the etiology of human congenital heart disease. Csh Perspect Med. 2014; 4: a013953. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a013953.Google ScholarPubMed
Liu, S, Liu, J, Tang, J, Ji, J, Chen, J, Liu, C. Environmental risk factors for congenital heart disease in the Shandong peninsula, China: a hospital-based case-control study. J Epidemiol 2009; 19: 122130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tania, M, Amitoz, M, Paul, V, Cheryl, H-G, Heather, LB. Prevalence of congenital cardiovascular malformations varies by race and ethnicity. Int J Cardiol 2010; 143: 317322.Google Scholar
Silva, MJA, Ribeiro, LR, Lima, KVB, Lima, L. Adaptive immunity to SARS-coV-2 infection: a systematic review. Front Immunol 2022; 13: 1001198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priya, SP, Sunil, PM, Varma, S, Brigi, C, et al. Direct, indirect, post-infection damages induced by coronavirus in the human body: an overview. Virus 2022; 33: 116.Google ScholarPubMed
Tanacan, A, Oluklu, D, Laleli Koc, B, et al. The utility of systemic immune-inflammation index and systemic immune-response index in the prediction of adverse outcomes in pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019: analysis of 2649 cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2023; 49: 912919. doi: 10.1111/jog.15533 Epub 2022 Dec 29. PMID: 36582132CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Şahan, YÖ., Sakcak, B, Göncü Ayhan, Ş. et al. The influence of maternal COVID-19 on cardiac functions: from fetal life to infancy. Echocardiography 2024; 41: e15736. DOI: 10.1111/echo.15736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed