Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T20:26:37.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implementation of a multiphase, multi-institutional QI initiative to optimise sedation practices in cardiac ICU patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2025

Richard U. Garcia*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
Kimberly DiMaria
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
Jamie Penk
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Lurie Children’s Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
Sherrill Caprarola
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
Amy Romer
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA
Michael P. Fundora
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
Deborah U. Frank
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
Barbara-Jo Achuff
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Monroe Carrell Jr. Children’s Hospital Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
*
Corresponding author: Richard Garcia; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction:

There is wide variation in institutional sedation strategies in paediatric cardiac ICU. Validated tools such as State Behavioral Scale and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale were created to help standardise sedation practices.

Methods:

This is a multi-phase, multicentre, prospective project with the goal of optimising safety and comfort for paediatric cardiac ICU patients. Phase one consisted of an educational intervention with a self-paced, web-based video module on optimal sedation practices using validated sedation screening tools. Participant knowledge was assessed via a de-identified, unmatched pre- and post-test survey. Survey scores were reported as an aggregate average score and compared using a t-test.

Results:

There were 259 pre-tests, and 142 post-tests collected during the video-assisted educational intervention. There was a significant increase in mean score on the post-test compared to the pre-test for both instruments: from 4 to 4.8/10 for State Behavioral Scale (p = 0.01) and from 4.5 to 4.9 for Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (p = 0.04). 81% of respondents who completed the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale post-test and 88.1% of those who completed the State Behavioral Scale post-test said their practice would change based on the new knowledge acquired.

Conclusion:

We report that our newly developed learning module intervention was effective in increasing short-term knowledge about optimal sedation and sedation scoring. Ongoing phase two efforts include evaluation of long-term compliance of validated sedation screening tools and developing an objective score to measure individual cumulative opioid dosing in the cardiac critical care unit.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Lucas, SS, Nasr, VG, Ng, AJ, et al. Pediatric cardiac intensive care Society 2014 Consensus statement: pharmacotherapies in cardiac critical care: sedation, analgesia and muscle relaxant. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2016; 17 ( 3 Suppl 1 ): S3S15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasr, VG, DiNardo, JA. Sedation and analgesia in pediatric cardiac critical care. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2016; 17 ( 8 Suppl 1 ): S225S231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith-Parrish, M, Chaves, DPV, Katherine, T, et al. Analgesia, sedation, and anesthesia for neonates with cardiac disease. Pediatrics 2022; 150 ( Suppl 2 ): e2022056415K.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valentine, K, Cisco, MJ, Javier Lasa, J, et al. A survey of current practices in sedation, analgesia, withdrawal, and delirium management in paediatric cardiac ICUs. Cardiol Young 2023; 10: 16.Google Scholar
Achuff, BJ, Lemming, K, Jamie Causey, C, et al. Opioid Weaning Protocol Using Morphine Compared With Non-protocolized Methadone Associated With Decreased Dose and Duration of Opioid After Norwood Procedure. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2022; 23 ( 5 ): 361370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, LK. Anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Paediatr Drugs 2006; 8 ( 4 ): 223233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollak, U, Bronicki, RA, Achuff, B-J, Checchia, PA. Postoperative pain management in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery: where are we heading? J Intensive Care Med 2019; 25: 885066619871432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, MAQ, Harris, SK, Karen Fraser, A, et al. State behavioral scale: a sedation assessment instrument for infants and young children supported on mechanical ventilation. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2006; 7 ( 2 ): 107114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapia, R, López-Herce, J, Ángel, A, et al. Validity and reliability of the richmond agitation-sedation scale in pediatric intensive care patients: a multicenter study. Front Pediatr 2022; 3 ( 9 ): 795487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahodwala, M, Geransar, R, Julie, B, et al. The impact of the use of video-based educational interventions on patient outcomes in hospital settings: a scoping review. Patient Educ Couns 2018; 101 ( 12 ): 21162124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Garcia et al. supplementary material

Garcia et al. supplementary material
Download Garcia et al. supplementary material(File)
File 118.3 KB