Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2024
Many have interpreted symbolic material culture in the deep past as evidencing the origins sophisticated, modern cognition. Scholars from across the behavioural and cognitive sciences, including linguists, psychologists, philosophers, neuroscientists, primatologists, archaeologists, and palaeoanthropologists have used such artefacts to assess the capacities of extinct human species, and to set benchmarks, milestones, or otherwise chart the course of human cognitive evolution. To better calibrate our expectations, the present paper instead explores the material culture of three contemporary African forager groups. Results show that, although these groups are unequivocally behaviourally modern, they would leave scant long-lasting evidence of symbolic behaviour. Artefact sets are typically small, perhaps as a consequence of residential mobility. When traded materials are excluded, few artefacts have components with moderate–to–strong taphonomic signatures. The present analyses show that artefact function influences preservation probability, such that utilitarian tools for the processing of materials and the preparation of food are disproportionately likely to contain archaeologically traceable components. There are substantial differences in material use among populations, which create important population-level variation in preservation probability, independent of cognitive differences. I discuss the factors – cultural, ecological, and practical – that influence material choice. In so doing, I highlight the difficulties of using past material culture as an evolutionary or cognitive yardstick.
Target article
Reconsidering the link between past material culture and cognition in light of contemporary hunter–gatherer material use
Related commentaries (21)
Advancing paleoanthropology beyond default nulls
All that glitters is not gold: The false-symbol problem in archaeology
Animal artefacts challenge archaeological standards for tracing human symbolic cognition
Archaeology retains a central role for studying the behavioral and cognitive evolution of our species and genus
Are we jingling modern hunter-gatherers and early Homo sapiens?
Behavioural modernity is dead: Long live behavioural modernity
Beyond the binary: Inferential challenges and solutions in cognitive archaeology
Cultural innovation is not only a product of cognition but also of cultural context
Don't ignore cognitive evolution during the three million years that preceded the archaeological record of material culture!
Inferences from absences
Material culture both reflects and causes human cognitive evolution
Negative priors and inferences from absence of evidence in cognitive and linguistic archaeology: Epistemically sound and scientifically strategic
Not just symbolism: Technologies may also have a less than direct connection with cognition
Perishable material choice indicates symbolic and representational capacities
Proposing the DN(C)-model of material evidence for well-calibrated claims about past cultures
Revising the null model in language evolution research
Shared intentionality may have been favored by persistence hunting in Homo erectus
Sports, team games, and physical skill competitions as an important source of symbolic material culture with low preservation probability
The cognitive and evolutionary science of behavioural modernity goes beyond material chronology
The Mbuti people still reproduce a 75,000 years old recursive pattern
What would be pre-modern human cognition?
Author response
Hominin cognition: The null hypothesis