Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-xq6d9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-09T21:10:18.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reproductive organ weights and semen quality of pubertal boars fed dietary fumonisin B1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2009

F. A. Gbore
F. A. Gbore*
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology and Fisheries, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba Akoko, Ondo State, Nigeria
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Fumonisins, a group of toxic metabolites produced by the genus Fusarium, are known to be consumed by farm animals and are the causative agent or a suspected contributing factor in farm animal diseases. Pigs are particularly susceptible to fumonisins. Reproductive inefficiency is recognized as the most costly limiting constraint to efficient animal production. To account for potential reproductive effects of fumonisin in boars, dietary fumonisin B1 (FB1) was fed to 24 male Large White weanling pigs, 8 to 9 weeks of age. The animals were randomly assigned to four diets containing 5.0, 10.0, 15.0 and 0.2 mg FB1/kg constituting diets 1, 2, 3 and control diet, respectively. After 6 months, semen samples were collected from the pubertal boars and analysed. After the semen collection, all the pubertal boars were killed by decapitation, their reproductive systems dissected and the weights of the testes and epididymides as well as the volumes of the testes recorded. Dietary FB1 did not influence both the relative weights of the testes and epididymides as well as the volumes of the testes. Except for the semen volume and spermatozoa morphological abnormalities, all the semen characteristics studied decreased in a dose-dependent manner and the decrease was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The sperm concentration, total sperm and motile sperm per ejaculate of the animals on diet 3 were 83.3%, 79.1% and 59.6% of the controls, respectively. The dietary FB1 levels influenced the mass activities of the semen, which ranged from very turbulent motion for animals on the control diet to absence of wave motion for those on diet 3. The study revealed that male weanling pigs for breeding should not be exposed to dietary FB1 higher than 5 mg/kg for optimum reproductive performance. The results of this present study suggest that the recommendation of 10 mg/kg by the United States Food and Drug Administration as the maximum level of total dietary fumonisins was above the no-observable-effect level of dietary fumonisin for swine.

Keywords

reproductive performanceboarsFusarium verticillioidesfumonisin
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 8 , August 2009 , pp. 1133 - 1137
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bacon, CW, Porter, JK, Norred, WP 1995. Toxic interaction of fumonisin B1 and fusaric acid measured by injection into fertile chicken egg. Mycopathologia 129, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colenbrander, B, Kemp, B 1990. Factors influencing semen quality in pigs. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 40(suppl.), 105–115.Google ScholarPubMed
Dänicke, S, Valenta, H, Klobasa, F, Döll, S, Ganter, M, Flachowsky, G 2004. Effects of graded levels of Fusarium toxin contaminated wheat in diets for fattening pigs on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, deoxynivalenol balance and clinical serum characteristics. Archives of Animal Nutrition 58, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Döll, S, Dänicke, S, Ueberschär, K-H, Valenta, H, Schnurrbusch, U, Ganter, M, Klosaba, F, Flachowsky, G 2003. Effects of graded levels of Fusarium toxin contaminated maize in diets for female weaned piglets. Archives of Animal Nutrition 57, 311–334.Google Scholar
Egbunike, GN 1995. A toast for spermatozoa: one half the story of mammalian life. An inaugural lecture. University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria, 43pp.Google Scholar
Floss, JL, Casteel, SW, Johnson, GC, Rottinghaus, GE, Krause, GF 1994. Developmental toxicity of fumonisin in Syrian hamsters. Mycopathologia 128, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowers, WL 1998. Management of reproduction. In Progress in pig science (ed. J Wiseman, MA Varley and JP Chadwick), vol. 18, pp. 383–405. University of Nottingham Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Flynn, TJ, Pritchard, D, Bradlaw, J, Eppley, R, Page, S 1996. In vitro embryotoxicity of fumonisin B1 evaluated with cultured postimplantation staged rat embryos. In Vitro Toxicology 9, 271–279.Google Scholar
Friend, DW, Trenholm, HL, Elliot, JI, Thompson, BK, Hartin, KE 1982. Effect of feeding vomitoxin-contaminated wheat to pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 62, 1211–1222.Google Scholar
Gbore, FA 2003. Response of rabbits to micro doses of fumonisin: performance, intestinal histology, haematology and serum enzymology. MSc, University of Ibadan, Ibadan.Google Scholar
Gbore, FA, Egbunike, GN 2007. Influence of dietary fumonisin B1 on nutrient utilization by growing pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19, Article #93. Retrieved July 6, 2007, from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd19/7/gbor19093.htmGoogle Scholar
Gbore, FA, Egbunike, GN 2008. Testicular and epididymal sperm reserves and sperm production of pubertal boars fed dietary fumonisin B1. Animal Reproduction Science 105, 392–397.Google Scholar
Gbore, FA, Ewuola, EO, Ogunlade, JT, Idahor, KO, Salako, AO, Egbunike, GN 2007. Spermatogenesis, gonadal sperm reserves and fertility of rabbits fed micro doses of fumonisin. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production 34, 316–322.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Winfield, CG, Hansen, C 1983. High mating frequency for boars: predicting the effect on sexual behaviour, fertility and fecundity. Animal Production 37, 409–413.Google Scholar
Hendricks, K 1999. Fumonisins and neural tube defects in South Texas. Epidemiology 10, 198–200.Google ScholarPubMed
House, JD, Abramson, D, Crow, GH, Nyachoti, CM 2002. Feed intake, growth and carcass parameters of swine consuming diets containing low levels of deoxynivalenol from naturally contaminated barley. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 82, 559–565.Google Scholar
Huang, YT, Johnson, RK 1996. Effect of selection for size of testis in boars on semen and testis traits. Journal of Animal Science 74, 750–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Javed, T, Richard, JL, Bennett, GA, Dombrink-Kurtzman, MA, Bunte, RM, Koelkebeck, KW, Côté, LM, Leeper, RW, Buck, WB 1993. Embryopathic and embryocidal effects of purified fumonisin B1 or Fusarium proliferatum culture material extract on chicken embryos. Mycopathologia 123, 185–193.Google Scholar
Kastelic, JP, Cook, RB, Pierson, RA, Coulter, GH 2001. Relationships among scrotal and testicular characteristics, sperm production, and semen quality in 129 beef bulls. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 65, 111–115.Google ScholarPubMed
Kemp, B, Vertsegen, MWA 1991. Nutrition and sperm production. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 26 (suppl. 1), 287–296.Google Scholar
Larsson, K 1986. Evaluation of boar semen. In Current therapy in theriogenology, 2nd edition (ed. DA Morrow), pp. 972–975. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Louis, GF, Lewis, AJ, Weldon, WC, Miller, PS, Kittok, RJ, Stroup, WW 1994. The effect of protein intake on boar libido, semen characteristics, and plasma hormone concentrations. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2038–2050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malmgren, L, Larsson, K 1984. Semen quality and fertility after heat stress in boars. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 25, 425–435.Google Scholar
Murphy, PA, Rice, LG, Ross, PF 1993. Fumonisin B1, B2 and B3 content of Iowa, Wisconsin, and Illinois corn and corn screenings. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 41, 263–266.Google Scholar
Nelson, PE, Plattner, RD, Shackelford, DD, Desjardins, AE 1991. Production of fumonisins by Fusarium moniliforme strains from various substrates and geographic areas. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 57, 2410–2412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, PE, Juba, JH, Ross, PF, Rice, LG 1994. Fumonisin production by Fusarium species on solid substrates. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists International 77, 522–524.Google Scholar
Norred, WP 1993. Fumonisins – mycotoxins produced by Fusarium moniliforme. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 38, 309–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogunlade, JT, Ewuola, EO, Gbore, FA, Bandyopadhyay, R, Niezen, J, Egbunike, GN 2006. Testicular and epididymal sperm reserves of rabbits fed fumonisin contaminated diets. World Applied Sciences Journal 1, 35–38.Google Scholar
Park, CS, Kim, IC, Son, DS 2000. Study on the optimal concentration of motile sperm per dose in the artificial insemination with liquid boar semen. In Boar semen preservation IV: Proceedings of fourth International Conference on Boar Semen Preservation (ed. LA Johnson and HD Guthrie), p. 255. Allen Press, Lawrence, KS, USA.Google Scholar
SAS (Statistical Analysis Systems Institute) 1999. SAS/STAT user’s guide: version 8 for windows. SAS Institute Inc., SAS Campus Drive, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Shephard, GS, Thiel, PG, Stockenström, S, Sydenham, EW 1996. Worldwide survey of fumonisin contamination of corn and corn–based products. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists International 79, 671–687.Google ScholarPubMed
United States Food and Drug Administration 2001. Guidance for industry: fumonisin levels in human foods and animal feeds. US FDA Center for food safety and applied nutrition, and center for veterinary medicine, Washington, DC, USA. Retrieved November 9, 2001, from http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/fumongu2.htmlGoogle Scholar
Voss, KA, Bacon, CW, Herbert, RA, Chapin, RE, Chamberlain, WJ, Plattner, RD, Merdith, FI 1996. Studies on the reproductive effects of Fusarium moniliforme culture material in rats and the biodistribution of [14C] fumonisin B1 in pregnant rats. Natural Toxins 4, 24–33.Google Scholar
World Health Organization 1999. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm–cervical mucus interactions, 4th edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Yoo, H-S, Norred, WP, Wang, E, Merril, AH Jr, Riley, RT 1992. Fumonisin inhibition of de novo sphingolipid biosynthesis and cytotoxicity are correlated in LLC – PKI cells. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 114, 9–15.Google Scholar
Zaneveld, LJD, Polakoski, KL 1977. Collection and physical examination of the ejaculate. In Techniques of human andrology (ed. ESE Hafez), pp. 147–172. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar