Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-xlmdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-11T19:39:41.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Haematological and serum biochemical responses of chickens to hydric stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2013

N. Chikumba ,
H. Swatson  and
M. Chimonyo
N. Chikumba
Affiliation:
Animal and Poultry Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, P. Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa
H. Swatson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Environmental Affairs, Cedara College of Agriculture, P. Bag X6008, Hilton 3245, South Africa
M. Chimonyo*
Affiliation:
Animal and Poultry Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, P. Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Dehydration can be extremely damaging to the performance and welfare of indigenous chickens. The effect of water restriction on haematological and biochemical parameters was compared in Naked Neck (NNK) and Ovambo (OVB) chickens. A total of 54 8-week-old pullets each of NNK and OVB chickens with an initial average weight of 641 ± 10 g/bird were randomly assigned to three water intake treatments with three replications, each having six birds. The water restriction treatments were ad libitum, 70% and 40% of ad libitum intake. Nine experimental pens with a floor space of 3.3 m2 per strain were used. Feed was provided ad libitum. Packed cell volume (PCV), erythrocyte count (RBC), mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and total leucocyte count (WBC), and biochemical parameters (uric acid (UA)), creatinine (CREAT), total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), globulin (GLOB), triglyceride (TGA), total cholesterol (TC), high- (HDLC) and low- (LDLC) density lipoprotein cholesterol and activity of alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and aspartate transaminase (AST) were determined from blood collected after 60 days of water restriction. PCV was higher (P < 0.05) in NNK than OVB chickens offered water ad libitum, but similar in birds offered 70% and 40% of ad libitum. There were no differences in RBC and MCV values between strains, but MCV was higher in birds on 40% than 70% of ad libitum water intake, irrespective of strain. Naked neck chickens had higher (P < 0.05) WBC values than OVB at 40% restriction level, but lower WBC than OVB at 70% water restriction level. UA, CREAT, TGA, TC, LDLC, TP and GLOB increased (P < 0.05) with each increment in water restriction, but the increase in CREAT and TC was more pronounced in OVB than NNK chickens. The opposite was observed for UA. ALT activity indicated that liver function was not affected by water restriction. It was concluded that the two strains can withstand up to 40% of ad libitum water restriction, but NNK tolerated water stress better than OVB chickens.

Keywords

blood profilesnaked-neck chickensovambo chickenswater stress
Type
Behaviour, welfare and health
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 9 , September 2013 , pp. 1517 - 1522
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahmed, AS, Alamer, MA 2011. Effect of short-term water restriction on body weight, egg production, and immune response of local and commercial layers in the late phase of production. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 24, 825–833.Google Scholar
Arad, Z, Horowitz, M, Eylath, U, Marder, J 1989. Osmoregulation and body fluid compartmentalization in dehydrated heat-exposed pigeons. American Journal of Comparative Physiology 257, R377–R382.Google ScholarPubMed
Arad, Z, Arnason, S, Chadwick, A, Skadhauge, S 1985. Osmotic and hormonal responses to heat and dehydration in the fowl. Journal of Comparative Physiology B 155, 227–234.Google Scholar
Awodi, S, Ayo, JO, Atodo, AD, Dezende, T 2005. Some haematological parameters and the erythrocyte osmotic fragility in the laughing dove (Streptopella senegalensis) and the village weaver bird (Ploceus cucullatus). In Proceedings of 10th Annual Conference of Animal Science Association of Nigeria, held on 1215 September at University of Ado Ekiti, Nigeria (ed. FA Dairo, SOK Fajemilehin and GE Onibi), University of Ado Ekiti Press, Nigeria, pp. 384–387.Google Scholar
Bell, GH, Esmilie-Smith, D, Patterson, CR 1972. Textbook of physiology and biochemistry. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh and London, 229–230.Google Scholar
Cahaner, A, Deeb, N, Gutman, M 1993. The effects of the plumage-reducing Naked Neck (Na) gene on the performance of fast growing broilers at normal and high ambient temperature. Poultry Science 72, 767–775.Google Scholar
Campbell, TW, Coles, EH 1986. Avian clinical pathology. In Veterinary clinical pathology, 4th editon (ed. EH Coles), pp. 279–300. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, USA.Google Scholar
Cork, SC, Halliwell, RW 2002. The veterinary laboratory and field manual, first edition. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp. 1–497.Google Scholar
Deeb, N, Cahaner, A 2001. Genotype-by-environment interaction with broiler genotypes differing in growth rate 1. The effects of high ambient temperatures and naked neck genotype on lines differing in genetic background. Poultry Science 80, 695–702.Google Scholar
Fasina, OF, Ologhobo, AD, Ayoada, GO, Adeniran, GA, Adeyemi, O 1999. Nutritional and toxicological assessments of Vernonia amygdalina leaves in nutrition of broiler chicks. 2: effect on performance haematology and biochemistry indices. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of the Animal Science Association of Nigeria (ASAN), 14-16 September, IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria, pp. 19-22.Google Scholar
Friedewald, WT, Levy, RI, Fredrickson, DS 1972. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clinical Chemistry 18, 499–502.Google Scholar
Iheukwumere, FC, Herbert, U 2003. Physiological responses of broiler chickens to quantitative water restriction; haematology and serum biochemistry. International Journal of Poultry Science 2, 117–119.Google Scholar
Iyayi, EA, Tewe, OO 1998. Serum total protein, urea and creatinine levels as indices of quality of cassava diet for pigs. Tropical Veterinarian 36, 59–67.Google Scholar
Jain, NC 1986. Schaulm veterinary haematology, 4th edition. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Katanbaf, MN, Jones, DE, Dunnington, EA, Gross, WB, Siegel, PB 1988. Anatomical and physiological responses of early and late feathering broiler chickens to various feeding regimes. Archives Geflügelkeit 52, 119–126.Google Scholar
Ladokun, AO, Yakubu, A, Otite, JR, Omeje, JN, Sokunbi, OA, Onyeji, E 2008. Haematological and serum biochemical indices of naked neck and normally feathered Nigerian indigenous chickens in a sub humid tropical environment. International Journal of Poultry Science 7, 55–58.Google Scholar
Lumeij, JT 1987. Plasma urea, creatinine and uric acid concentrations in response to dehydration in racing pigeons. Avian Pathology 16, 377–382.Google Scholar
Maxwell, MH 1993. Avian blood leucocyte responses to stress. Poultry Science 49, 34–42.Google Scholar
Maxwell, MH, Hocking, PM, Robertson, GW 1992. Differential leucocyte responses to various degrees of food restriction in broilers, turkeys and ducks. British Poultry Science 33, 177–187.Google Scholar
Maxwell, MH, Robertson, GW, Spence, S, Mccorquodale, CC 1990. Comparison of haematological values in restricted and ad libitum fed domestic fowls: red blood cell characteristics. Poultry Science 31, 407–413.Google Scholar
Mmereole, FUC 2009. Effects of age and breeds on the haematological parameters of broilers. Natural and Applied Sciences Journal 10, 90–95.Google Scholar
Muchadeyi, FC, Sibanda, S, Kusina, NT, Kusina, J, Makuza, S 2004. The village chicken production system in Rushing a District of Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 16(6) (http://www.cipav.org.co/cipav/pubs/index.htm).Google Scholar
Mushi, EZ, Binta, MG, Chabo, RG, Ndebele, RT 1999. Haematological studies on apparently healthy Tswana indigenous chickens (Gallus domesticus) around Gaborone, Botswana. INFPD Newsletter 9, 83–88.Google Scholar
Peebles, ED, Burnham, MR, Walzem, RL, Branton, SL, Gerard, PD 2004. Effects of fasting on serum lipids and lipoprotein profiles in the egg-laying hen (Gallus domesticus). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiolology 138, 305–311.Google Scholar
Peters, SO, Ikeobi, CON, Ozoje, MO, Adebambo, OA 2002. Genetic variations in the performance of the Nigerian local chicken. Tropical Animal Health and Production 5, 37–46.Google Scholar
Pires, DL, Malheiros, EB, Boleli, IC 2007. Influence of sex, age, and fasting on blood parameters and body, bursa, spleen and yolk sac weights of broiler chicks. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 9, 221–228.Google Scholar
Rwanedzi, NE 2010. An evaluation of family poultry production systems in the Northern region of South Africa. MSc. Thesis,Technikon Port Elizabeth, George, South Africa.Google Scholar
Shaniko, S 2003. Physiological responses of laying hens to the alternative housing system. International Journal of Poultry Science 2, 357–360.Google Scholar
Skadhauge, E 1981. Osmoregulation in birds. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 84–91.Google Scholar
Statistical Analytical Systems (SAS) 2004. SAS/STAT user's guide (release 8.1 edition) SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Takei, Y, Okawara, Y, Kobayashi, H 1988. Water-intake induced by water deprivation in the quail, Cortunix-Japonica. Journal of Comparative Physiology- Biochemical Systemic and Environmental Physiology B 158, 519–525.Google Scholar
Van Marle-Köster, E, Nel, LH 2000. Genetic characterization of native southern African chicken populations: evaluation and selection of polymorphic microsatellite markers. South African Journal of Animal Science 30, 1–6.Google Scholar
Woerpel, W, Rosskopf, WJ 1984. Clinical experience with avian laboratory diagnosis. Veterinary Clinics of North America, Small Animal Practice 14, 249–272.Google Scholar