Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-2mk96 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-09T13:50:34.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radicalism or Reformism: The Sources of Working-class Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Seymour Martin Lipset
Seymour Martin Lipset*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

From my work on my doctoral dissertation (Lipset 1950, 1968) down to the present, I have been interested in the problem of “American exceptionalism.” That curious phrase emerged from the debate in the international Communist movement in the 1920s concerning the sources of the weakness of left-wing radical movements in the United States (Draper 1960, pp. 268-72; Lipset 1977a, pp. 107-61). The key question repeatedly raised in this context has been, is America qualitatively different from other industrial capitalist countries? Or, to use Sombart's words, “Why is there no Socialism in the United States?” (Sombart 1976).

In a forthcoming book, I evaluate the hypotheses advanced by various writers from Karl Marx onward to explain the absence of an effective socialist party on the American political scene. (For a preliminary formulation, see Lipset 1977b, pp. 31-149, 346-63.) If any of the hypotheses are valid, they should also help to account for the variation among working-class movements in other parts of the world. In this article, therefore, I shall reverse the emphasis from that in my book and look at socialist and working-class movements comparatively, applying elsewhere some of the propositions that have been advanced to explain the American situation.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , March 1983 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allardt, E., and Pesonen, P. 1967. Cleavages in Finnish politics. In Party systems and voter alignments. ed. S. M. Lipset and S. Rokkan, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Aubert, V. 1974. Stratification. In Norwegian society. ed. Ramsoy, N. R., New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, S. H. 1966. Italy: oppositions on left, right, and center. In Political oppositions in western democracies, ed. Dahl, R. A., New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, D. 1973. The coming of post-industrial society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bendix, R. 1977. Nation-building and citizenship. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brenan, G. 1950. The Spanish labyrinth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buddenburger, T. 1922. Das Soziologische Problem der Sozialdemokratie. Archiv fuer Sozialwissenschaft and Sozialpolitik 49: 108–32.Google Scholar
Burnham, W. D. 1974. The United States: the politics of heterogeneity. In Electoral behavior: a comparative handbook, ed. Rose, R., New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Carr, R. 1966. Spain, 1808-1939. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Castles, F. G. 1978. The social democratic image of society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cole, G. D. H. 1956. A history of socialist thought, Vol. III, The second international, 1889-1914. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cornell, R. (n.d.). Culture, values, and the development of socialism in Denmark. Unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, York University, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Daalder, H. 1981. Consociationalism, center and periphery in the Netherlands. In Mobilization, center-periphery structures and nation-building, ed. Per Torsvik, Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Daalder, H. 1966a. The Netherlands: opposition in a segmented society. In Political oppositions in western democracies, ed. Dahl, R. A., New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Daalder, H. 1966b. Parties, elites, and political developments in Western Europe. In Political parties and political development, ed. La Palombara, J. and Weiner, M., Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1966. Some explanations. In Political oppositions in western democracies, ed. Dahl, R. A., New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. 1967. Society and democracy in Germany. Garden, City, N.Y.: Doubleday/Anchor.Google Scholar
de Man, H. 1928. The psychology of socialism. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Derfler, L. 1973. Socialism since Marx. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, K. 1953. Nationalism and social communication. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Draper, T. 1960. American communism and Soviet Russia. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Eckstein, H. 1966 Division and cohesion in democracy, a study of Norway. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Engels, F. 1936. Engels to Sorge, February 8, 1890 and December 31, 1982. In K. Marx and F. Engels, Selected correspondence, 1846-1895. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Engels, F. 1953. The English elections. In K. Marx and F. Engels, On Britain. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
Engels, F. 1968a. Introduction to Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. In K. Marx and F. Engels, Selected works. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Engels, F. 1968b. The role of force in history. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Epstein, L. D. 1980. Political parties in western democracies. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.Google Scholar
Friedberg, G. 1974. Comment. In Failure of a dream? ed. Laslett, J. H. M. and Lipset, S. M., Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
Galenson, W. 1952. Scandinavia. In Comparative labor movements, ed. Galenson, W., New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gay, P. 1952. The dilemma of democratic socialism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Groh, D. 1973. Negative Integration und revolutionaerer Attentismus. Frankfurt/Main: Verlag Ullstein.Google Scholar
Gruner, E. 1968. Die Arbeiter in der Schweiz im 19. Jahrhundert. Bern: Francke Verlag.Google Scholar
Gulick, C. A. 1948. Austria from Hapsburg to Hitler, Vol. I, Labor's workshop of democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hartz, L. 1955. The liberal tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Hearnshaw, F. J. O. 1933. Conservatism in England, an analytical, historical and political survey. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hoffman, S. 1963. Paradoxes of the French political community. In Hoffman, S.et al., In search of France, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. 1975. Switzerland. London: Benn.Google Scholar
Kautsky, K. 1910. The class struggle (The Erfurt Program). Chicago: Charles H. Kerr.Google Scholar
Knoellinger, C. E. 1960. Labor in Finland. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Laidler, H. 1927. Socialism in thought and action. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Landauer, C. 1959. European socialism, Vol. I. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Landes, D. S. 1951. French business and the businessman: a social and cultural analysis. In Modern France: problems of the third and fourth republics. ed. Earle, E. M., Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I. (n.d.). Preface to the Russian translation of “Letters by J. Ph. Becker, J. Dietzgen, F. Engels, K. Marx and others to F. A. Sorge and others.” In On Britain, ed. Lenin, V. I., Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I. 1973. What is to be done? Peking: Foreign Languages Press.Google Scholar
Lidtke, V. L. 1966. The outlawed party: social democracy in Germany 1878-1890. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. 1968. The politics of accommodation: pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, J. 1981. A century of politics and interests in Spain. In Organizing interests in Western Europe. ed. Berger, S., New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. 1950. 1968. Agrarian socialism: the cooperative commonwealth federation in Saskatchewan. Berkeley: University of California Press (expanded edition, 1968).Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. 1977a. American “Exceptionalism” in North American perspective. In The idea of America, ed. Adams, E. M., Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. 1977b. Why no socialism in the United States? In Sources of contemporary radicalism, ed. Bialer, S. and Sluzar, S., Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. 1981. Political man: the social bases of politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press (expanded edition of original, published in 1960).Google Scholar
Lipson, L. 1948. The politics of equality. New Zealand's adventures in democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lorwin, V. 1954. The French labor movement. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lorwin, V. 1958. Working-class politics and economic development: Western Europe. The American Historical Review 63: 338–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luebbert, G. 1983. A theory of government formation. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Mabille, X., and Lorwin, V. 1977. The Belgian socialist party. In Social democratic parties in Western Europe, ed. Patterson, W. F. and Thomas, A. H., London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Malefakis, E. 1973. A comparative analysis of worker movements in Spain and Italy. Paper prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the American Historical Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Mannheim, K. 1936. Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Marks, G. W. 1982. Trade unions in politics. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. 1964. Class, citizenship and social development. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Martin, W. C., and Hopkins, K. 1980. Cleavage crystallization and party linkages in Finland, 1900-1918. In Political parties and linkages, a comparative perspective, ed. Lawson, K., New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, A. J. 1981. The persistence of the old regime: Europe to the great war. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Meinecke, F. 1928. Weltburgertum und Nationalstaat. Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Michels, R. 1906. “Die deutsche Sozialdemokratie. I. Parteimitgliedschaft und soziale Zusammensetzung. Archivfuer Sozialwissenschaft und Socialpolitik 26: 471–556.Google Scholar
Moore, B. Jr. 1967. Social origins of dictatorship and democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, D. J. 1975. Introduction. In Labor in politics: the state labor parties in Australia, ed. Murphy, D. J., St. Lucia, Queensland: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, S. 1932. Die deutschen Partem: Wesen und Wandel nach dem Kriege. Berlin: Junker und Dumhaupt.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1969. Politics and social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Payne, S. G. 1970. The Spanish revolution. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Perlman, S. 1928. A theory of the labor movement. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pierson, S. 1979. British socialists: the journey from fantasy to politics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulzer, P. 1967. Political representation and elections in Britain. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Ridley, F. F. 1970. Revolutionary syndicalism in France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. 1970. Citizens, elections, parties. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. 1981. The growth and structuring of mass politics. In Nordic democracy, ed. Allardt, E.et al.Copenhagen: Det Danske Selskab.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, R. N. 1960. The radical tradition in Australia: an interpretation. The Review of Politics 22: 115–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A. 1931. The birth of the German republic 1871-1918. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roth, G. 1955. The social democrats in imperial Germany. Totowa, N.J.: Bedminster.Google Scholar
Rustow, D. A. 1955. The politics of compromise, a study of parties and cabinet government in Sweden. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, J. E. 1951. Strains in the social structure. In Modern France: problems of the third and fourth republics, ed. Earle, E. M., Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schultze, R. O. 1980. Funktion von Wahlen und Konstitutionsbedingungen von Wahlverhalten im deutschen Kaiserreich. In Waehlerbewegung in der Europaeischen Geschichte. ed. Buesch, O., Berlin: Colloquium Verlag.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1950. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Sewell, W. H. Jr., 1976. Social mobility in a nineteenthcentury European city: some findings and implications. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7:217–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, P. F. 1955. Three frontiers: some comparative studies of Canadian, American and Australian Settlement. Pacific Historical Review 24: 369–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shell, K. L. 1962. The transformation of Austrian socialism. New York: University Publishers.Google Scholar
Siegfried, A. 1950. Switzerland, a democratic way of life. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Sombart, W. 1976. Why is there no socialism in the United States? London: Macmillan. This book was first published in German in 1906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stearns, P. N. 1971. Revolutionary syndicalism and French labor. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Sturmthal, A. 1953. Unity and diversity in European labor. Glencoe, 111.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sturmthal, A. 1972. Comparative labor movements. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Svaasand, L. 1980. Democratization and party formation in Scandinavia. In Waehlerbewegung in der Europaeischen Geschichte. ed. Buesch, O., Berlin: Colloquium Verlag.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1968. The making of the English working class. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Tingsten, H. 1973. The Swedish social democrats: their ideological development. Totowa, N.J.: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
Von Beyme, K. 1980. Challenge to power, trade unions and industrial relations in capitalist countries. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Ward, R. 1959. The Australian legend. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waris, H. 1958. Finland. In The institutions of advanced societies. ed. Rose, A., Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1946. Essays in sociology, ed. Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1958. Gesammelte Politische Schriften. Tuebingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. 1906. The future in America. New York: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.