Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-2z2hb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-12T20:11:49.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Biochemical Property Relating to Power Seeking in Humans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1985

Douglas Madsen
Douglas Madsen*
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The disposition to seek power in a social arena is tied in this research to a biochemical marker, whole blood serotonin. This finding constitutes the first systematic evidence of any biochemical property in humans which differentiates power seekers from others. The disposition itself is given empirical content with the use of measures of three components of the Type A behavior pattern—aggressiveness, competitiveness, and drive—and of distrust and self-confidence. The statistical fit with serotonin is very good. This discovery echoes similar findings in a species of subhuman primates.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 79 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 448 - 457
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Blake, R., & Mouton, J. Reactions to intergroup competition under win-lose conditions. Management Science, 1961, 7, 420–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, R., & Geis, F. Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. Governments and political oppositions. In Greenstein, F. & Polsby, N. (Eds.), Handbook of political science (vol. 3, Macropolitical theory). Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley, 1975.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. Modern political analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1976.Google Scholar
Eldersveld, S. J. Political parties: A behavioral analysis. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1964.Google Scholar
Fiedler, F. The contingency model: A theory of leadership effectiveness. In Proshansky, H. & Seidenberg, B. (Eds.), Basic studies in social psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1965.Google Scholar
Friedman, M., & Rosenman, R. Type A behavior and your heart. New York: Knopf, 1974.Google Scholar
Gibb, C. Leadership. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley, 1969.Google Scholar
Glass, D. C. Behavior patterns, stress, and coronary disease. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1977.Google ScholarPubMed
Hamblin, R. L. Leadership and crises. Sociometry, 1958, 21, 322–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, R. L. Social attitudes: magnitude measurement and theory. In Blalock, H. M. (Ed.), Measurement in the social sciences: Theories and strategies. Chicago: Aldine, 1974.Google Scholar
Hutschnecker, A. The drive for power. New York: Evans and Co., 1974.Google Scholar
Jenkins, C. D. A comparative review of the interview and questionnaire methods in the assessment of the coronary-prone behavior pattern. In Dembroski, T., Weiss, S., Shields, J., Haynes, S., & Feinleib, M. (Eds.), Coronary-prone behavior. New York: Springer Verlag, 1978.Google ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, C. D., Rosenman, R., & Friedman, M. Development of an objective psychological test for the determination of the coronary-prone behavior pattern in employed men. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1967, 20, 371–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, C. D., Rosenman, R., & Friedman, M. Replicability of rating the coronary-prone behavior pattern. British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine, 1968, 22, 16–22.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. D. Power and personality. New York: Norton, 1948.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M. Stepwise regression: A caution. Political Methodology, 1978, 5, 213–240.Google Scholar
Lodge, M., & Tursky, B. Comparisons between category and magnitude scaling of political opinion employing src/cps items. American Political Science Review, 1979, 73, 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, M., & Tursky, B. On the magnitude scaling of political opinion in survey research. American Journal of Political Science, 1981, 25, 376–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvick, D. The middlemen of politics. In Crotty, W. (Ed.), Approaches to the study of party organization. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1967.Google Scholar
Matthews, K. Psychological perspectives on the Type A behavior pattern. Psychological Bulletin, 1982, 91, 293–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuire, M. Social dominance relationships in male vervet monkeys. International Political Science Review, 1982, 5, 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, M., Raleigh, M., & Brammer, G. Sociopharmacology. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 1982, 22, 643–661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuire, M., Raleigh, M., & Johnson, C. Social dominance in adult male vervet monkeys II: Behavior-biochemical relationships. Social Science Information, 1983, 22, 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, E., Nistico, G., & Scapagnini, U. Neurotransmitters and anterior pituitary function. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Raleigh, M., Brammer, G., & McGuire, M. Male dominance and the behavioral and physiological effects of drugs in vervet monkeys. In Miczek, K. (Ed.), Ethopharmacology. New York: A.R. Liss, 1983.Google Scholar
Raleigh, M., Brammer, G., McGuire, M., Yuwiler, A., Geller, E., & Johnson, C. Social status related differences in behavioral effects of drugs in vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus). In Steklis, H. & Kling, A. (Eds.), Hormones, drugs, and social behavior in primates. New York: Spectrum Publications, 1983.Google Scholar
Raleigh, M., & McGuire, M. Biosocialpharmacology. McLean Hospital Journal, 1980, 2, 73–84.Google Scholar
Raleigh, M., McGuire, M., Brammer, G., & Yuwiler, A. Social status and whole blood serotonin in vervets. Archives of General Psychiatry, in press.Google Scholar
Raleigh, M., Yuwiler, A., Brammer, G., McGuire, M., Geller, E., & Flannery, J. Peripheral correlates of serotonergically influenced behaviors in vervet monkeys. Psychopharmacology, 1981, 72, 241–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenman, R. The interview method of assessment of the coronary-prone behavior pattern. In Dembroski, T., Weiss, S., Shields, J., Haynes, S., & Feinleib, M. (Eds.), Coronary-prone behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1978.Google Scholar
Rotter, J. Generalized expectancies for internal vs. external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 1966, 80, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherif, M., et al. Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers' cave experiment. Norman, Okla.: University Book Exchange, 1960.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C., Gorsuch, R., & Lusheme, R. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychology Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
Stogdill, R. Handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Teitelbaum, P. Physiological psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1967.Google Scholar
Verba, S., & Nie, N. Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.Google Scholar
Wahlke, J. Pre-behavioralism in political science. American Political Science Review, 1979, 73, 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. Economy and society. New York: Bedminster Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Yuwiler, A., Brammer, G., Morley, J., Raleigh, M., Flannery, J., & Geller, E. Short-term and repetitive administration of oral tryptophan in normal men. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1981, 38, 619–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuwiler, A., Plotkin, S., Geller, E., & Ritvo, E. A rapid accurate procedure for the determination of serotonin in whole human blood. Biochemical Medicine, 1970, 3, 426–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zyzanski, S., & Jenkins, C. Basic dimensions within the coronary-prone behavior pattern. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1970, 22, 781–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.