Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T06:54:54.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Altering the Foundations of Support for the President Through Priming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Jon A. Krosnick  and
Donald R. Kinder
Jon A. Krosnick
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Donald R. Kinder
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The disclosure that high officials within the Reagan administration had covertly diverted to the Nicaraguan Contras funds obtained from the secret sale of weapons to Iran provides us with a splendid opportunity to examine how the foundations of popular support shift when dramatic events occur. According to our theory of priming, the more attention media pay to a particular domain—the more the public is primed with it—the more citizens will incorporate what they know about that domain into their overall judgment of the president. Data from the 1986 National Election Study confirm that intervention in Central America loomed larger in the public's assessment of President Reagan's performance after the Iran-Contra disclosure than before. Priming was most pronounced for aspects of public opinion most directly implicated by the news coverage, more apparent in political notices' judgments than political experts', and stronger in the evaluations of Reagan's overall performance than in assessments of his character.

Type
Research Notes
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 84 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 497 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Fiorina, Morris. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, Baruch, Slovic, Paul, and Lichtenstein, Sarah. 1980. “Knowing What You Want: Measuring Labile Values.” In Cognitive Processes in Choice and Decision Behavior, ed. Wallsten, Thomas. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., and Kinder, Donald R.. 1981. “Involvement, Expertise, and Schema Use: Evidence from Political Cognition.” In Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction, ed. Cantor, Nancy and Kihlstrom, John. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., Kinder, Donald R., and Larter, W. Michael. 1983. “The Novice and the Expert: Knowledge-based Strategies in Political Cognition.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 19: 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A. Jr., Rivers, Douglas, and Vasilatos, Nicholas. 1982a. “On the Demand for Economic Outcomes: Macroeconomic Performance and Mass Political Support in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany.” Journal of Politics 44: 426–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A. Jr., Rivers, Douglas, and Vasilatos, Nicholas. 1982b. “The Dynamics of Political Support for American Presidents among Occupational and Partisan Groups.” American Journal of Political Science 26: 312–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E. Tory, and King, Gary. 1981. “Accessibility of Social Constructs: Information-processing Consequences of Individual and Contextual Variability.” In Personality, Cognition, and Social Interactions, ed. Cantor, Nancy and Kihlstrom, John. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald R.. 1987. News That Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Peters, Mark D., Kinder, Donald R., and Krosnick, Jon A.. 1984. “The Evening News and Presidential Evaluations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46: 778–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Peters, Mark D., and Kinder, Donald R.. 1982. “Experimental Demonstrations of the Not-So-Minimal Political Consequences of Mass Media.” American Political Science Review 76: 848–58.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos. 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, Samuel. 1978. “Explaining Presidential Popularity.” American Political Science Review 72: 506–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, Samuel. 1986. Going Public. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., Adams, Gordon S., and Gronke, Paul W.. 1989. “Economics and Politics in the 1984 American Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 33: 491–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Thomas, R. Palfrey. 1989. “On Behalf of Experimentation.” University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Typescript.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Sears, David O.. 1985. “Public Opinion and Political Behavior.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, 3d ed., Vol. 2, ed., Lindzey, Gardner and Aronson, Elliot. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael. 1983. “Political Drama, Economic Conditions, and the Dynamics of Presidential Popularity.” American Journal of Political Science 27: 165–92.Google Scholar
Nuestadt, Richard E. 1960. Presidential Power; The Politics of Leadership. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Charles W., and Simon, Dennis M.. 1985. “Promise and Performance: A Dynamic Model of Presidential Popularity.” American Political Science Review 79: 334–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, Douglas, and Rose, Nancy L.. 1985. “Passing the President's Program: Public Opinion and Presidential Influence in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 29: 183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J. 1983. Forecasting Presidential Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Shelley E. 1982. “The Availability Bias in Social Perception and Interaction.” In Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, ed. Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211: 453–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaller, John. N.d. “Political Awareness, Elite Opinion Leadership, and the Mass Survey Response.” Social Cognition. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.