Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T21:04:39.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Key factors affecting overexpanded flow separation in design of large expansion ratio single expansion ramp nozzle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2024

Y. Yu*
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics, Chongqing Jiaotong University, 400074, Chongqing, China The Green Aerotechnics Research Institute of Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Green Aviation Energy and Power, 401120, Chongqing, China Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 210016, Nanjing, China
T. Yu
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics, Chongqing Jiaotong University, 400074, Chongqing, China The Green Aerotechnics Research Institute of Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Green Aviation Energy and Power, 401120, Chongqing, China
Y. Mao
Affiliation:
The Green Aerotechnics Research Institute of Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Green Aviation Energy and Power, 401120, Chongqing, China
Y. Yang
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics, Chongqing Jiaotong University, 400074, Chongqing, China The Green Aerotechnics Research Institute of Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Green Aviation Energy and Power, 401120, Chongqing, China
S. Liang
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics, Chongqing Jiaotong University, 400074, Chongqing, China The Green Aerotechnics Research Institute of Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Green Aviation Energy and Power, 401120, Chongqing, China
*
Corresponding author: Y. Yu; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

With the development of overall design methodologies for hypersonic vehicles and their propulsion systems, nozzles should expand airflow in a short length and provide sufficient thrust. Therefore, the large expansion ratio single expansion ramp nozzle (LSERN) is widely used. The form of the overexpanded flow field in the nozzle is complex, under the conditions of nozzle start-up, low speed and low nozzle pressure ratio (NPR), thereby negatively influencing the entire propulsion system. Thus, the nozzle flow separation pattern and the key factors affecting the flow separation pattern also deserve considerable attention. In this study, the design of SERN is completed using the cubic curve design method, and the model is numerically simulated for specific operating conditions to study the flow separation patterns and the transition processes of different patterns. Furthermore, the key factors affecting the various flow separation patterns in the nozzle are investigated in detail. Results show that the LSERN in different NPRs appeared in two types of restricted shock separation (RSS) pattern and free shock separation (FSS) pattern, as well as their corresponding flow separation pattern transition processes. The initial expansion angle and the nozzle length affect the range of NPRs maintained by the FSS pattern. The initial expansion angle affects the pattern of flow separation, whereas the nozzle length remarkably influences the critical NPR during transition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bordoloi, N., Pandey, K.M., Ray, M. and Kumar Sharma, K. Computational investigation to interpret the reacting flow conditions for two different fuels in the scramjet combustor, Results Eng., 2022, 15, p 100568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100568 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J.P., Kuffel, L., Sorto-Ramos, E., Seyed Alavi, K., Mccall, T. and Chudoba, B. Investigating the legacy of air-breathing and rocket propulsion systems, In AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2020 Forum (1–0). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-3916 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urzay, J. Supersonic combustion in air-breathing propulsion systems for hypersonic flight, Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech., 2018, 50, (1), pp 593627. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122316-045217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baidya, R., Pesyridis, A. and Cooper, M. Ramjet nozzle analysis for transport aircraft configuration for sustained hypersonic flight, Appl. Sci., 2018, 8, (4), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8040574 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J.P., Zhuo, C.F., Dai, C.L. and Sun, B. Numerical investigation of thermochemical non-equilibrium effects in Mach 10 scramjet nozzle, Aeronaut. J., 2024, First View, 118. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2024.47 Google Scholar
Spoth, K. and Moses, P. Structural design and analysis of a Mach zero to five turbo-ramjet system, In 29th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit (1–0). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1993. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-1983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, L., Escher, D., DeFrancesco, R., Gutierrez, J. and Buckwalter, D. Turbine Based Combination Cycle (TBCC) propulsion subsystem integration. In 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit (1–0). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2004. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-3649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malla, B., Holder, J., Anand, V. and Gutmark, E. Structural excitation of SERNs during supersonic operation: A source of screech amplitude modulation, J. Fluids Struct., 2021, 107, p 103390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2021.103390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgway, A., Sam, A.A. and Pesyridis, A. Modelling a hypersonic single expansion ramp nozzle of a hypersonic aircraft through parametric studies, Energies, 2018, 11, (12), p 3449. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123449 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, L., Liu, Z., Wang, Z. and Xiao, H. Numerical study of passive cavity control on high-pressure ratio single expansion ramp nozzle under over-expansion condition. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. G J. Aerosp. Eng., 2016, 230, (8), pp 14091422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410015611152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemmati, A. and Namazian, Z. Numerical analysis of shock wave train in single-expansion ramp nozzle under harmonic inlet and outlet conditions, Chem. Eng. Commun., 2021, pp 110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2021.2007091 Google Scholar
Mirjalily, S.A.A. Calibration of the k-ω shear stress transport turbulence model for shock wave boundary layer interaction in a SERN using machine learning, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., 2023, 146, pp 96104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2022.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lv, Z., Xu, J. and Mo, J. Numerical investigation of improving the performance of a single expansion ramp nozzle at off-design conditions by secondary injection, Acta Astronaut., 2017, 133, pp 233243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, P., Muruganandam, T.M. and Balusamy, K. Effect of flap deflection on single-expansion-ramp nozzles performance at different pressure ratios, J. Propul. Power, 2022, 38, (6), pp 10251041. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B38680 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, M. and Hagemann, G. Flow separation and side-loads in rocket nozzles, In 35th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit (1–0). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1999. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1999-2815 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nave, L. and Coffey, G. Sea level side loads in high-area-ratio rocket engines, In 9th Propulsion Conference (1–0). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1973. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1973-1284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Y., Xu, J., Yu, K. and Mo, J. Unsteady transitions of separation patterns in single expansion ramp nozzle, Shock Waves, 2015, 25, (6), pp 623633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-015-0595-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mousavi, S.M., Pourabidi, R. and Goshtasbi-Rad, E. Numerical investigation of over expanded flow behavior in a single expansion ramp nozzle, Acta Astronaut., 2018, 146, 273281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, C., Li, J., Fan, Z., Li, Y., Liang, J., Miao, L. and Gao, R. Wall pressure unsteadiness in an over-expanded single expansion ramp nozzle, Int. J. Modern Phys. B, 2020, 34, (14n16), p 2040102. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979220401025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lv, Z., Xu, J., Yu, Y. and Mo, J. A new design method of single expansion ramp nozzles under geometric constraints for scramjets, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2017, 66, pp 129139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.03.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, K., Chen, Y., Huang, S., Lv, Z. and Xu, J. Optimization and analysis of inverse design method of maximum thrust scramjet nozzles, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2020, 105, p 105948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.105948 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zebbiche, T. Stagnation pressure effect on the supersonic minimum length nozzle design, Aeronaut. J., 2019, 123, (1265), pp 10131031. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2019.42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Y., Xu, J., Mo, J. and Wang, M. Numerical investigation of separation pattern and separation pattern transition in overexpanded single expansion ramp nozzle, Aeronaut. J., 2014a, 118, (1202), pp 399424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000009192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Y., Shademan, M., Barron, R.M. and Balachandar, R. CFD study of effects of geometry variations on flow in a nozzle, Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech., 2012, 6, (3), 412425. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2012.11015432 Google Scholar
Yu, Y., Xu, J., Mo, J. and Wang, M. Principal parameters in flow separation patterns of over-expanded single expansion RAMP nozzle, Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech., 2014b, 8(2), pp 274288. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2014.11015513 Google Scholar
Drikakis, D., Ritos, K., Spottswood, S.M. and Riley, Z.B. Flow transition to turbulence and induced acoustics at Mach 6, Phys Fluids (1994), 2021, 33, (7), p 076112. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0054345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokkinakis, I.W., Drikakis, D., Ritos, K. and Spottswood, S.M. Direct numerical simulation of supersonic flow and acoustics over a compression ramp, Phys Fluids (1994), 2020, 32, (6), p 066107. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0010548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, T., Wu, X., Yu, Y., Li, R. and Zhang, H. Establishment and validation of a relationship model between nozzle experiments and CFD results based on convolutional neural network, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2023, 142, p 108694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.108694 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, T., Yu, Y., Mao, Y.P., Yang, Y.L. and Xu, S.L. Comparative study of OpenFOAM solvers on separation pattern and separation pattern transition in overexpanded single expansion ramp nozzle, J. Appl. Fluid Mech., 2023, 16, (11), pp 22492262. https://doi.org/10.47176/jafm.16.11.1751 Google Scholar
Jia, S., Cao, X., Wang, F., Zhang, C., Yuan, X. and Yu, K.-T. Renormalization group method for the turbulent mass transport two-equation model, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2022, 249, p 117306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.117306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Xiao, Y. and Yang, W. Study of gas-solid two-phase flow in pipeline elbows using an LES-DPM coupling method, Powder Technol., 2023, 413, p 118012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2022.118012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galván, S., Reggio, M. and Guibault, F. Assessment study of K-ɛ turbulence models and near-wall modeling for steady state swirling flow analysis in draft tube using fluent, Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech., 2011, 5, (4), pp 459478. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2011.11015386 Google Scholar
Rahimzadeh, H., Maghsoodi, R., Sarkardeh, H. and Tavakkol, S. Simulating flow over circular spillways by using different turbulence models, Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech., 2012, 6, (1), pp 100109. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2012.11015406 Google Scholar
Yu, Y. Over-expanded separation transitions of single expansion ramp nozzle in the accelerating and decelerating processes, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2020, 98, p 105674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar