Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T00:11:09.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CFD modelling of micro turbomachinery blade: integrating surface roughness with novel reverse-engineering strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2024

Q. Yu*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
R. Howell
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
*
Corresponding author:Q. Yu; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper presents the results of reverse-engineering (RE) strategies, surface roughness and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling for a Wren100 micro gas turbine (MGT). Utilising silicone moulds and resin tooling, precise blade geometry capture was achieved for 3D reconstruction allowing for discrete and parametric geometric models to be created. Using these geometries, CFD simulations employing both Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) models, alongside experimental wind tunnel cascade tests, were used to evaluate these reverse engineering strategies. The results show that while the parametric model captures overall MGT performance with fewer parameters, the discrete model provides enhanced accuracy, highlighting its suitability for detailed aerodynamic analyses. Contrary to initial expectations, surface roughness exhibited a noticeable impact on performance despite the lower Reynolds numbers (40,000), as demonstrated by the CFD model and wind tunnel experiments. The results indicate that surface roughness can reduce laminar separation bubbles on the blade leading edge, delay the onset of transition, and mitigate secondary flow losses. Overall, this study contributes to knowledge advancement in turbine blade reverse engineering and aerodynamics by detailing the impact of surface roughness on performance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ren, L., Zhu, R., Liao, L. and Zhou, Y. Analysis on the development of micro gas turbine generation technology, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2021, 1983, (1), p 012006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AMT Netherlands. AMT Netherlands Mercury HP, Amtjets.com, 2022, http://www.amtjets.com/MercuryHP.php Google Scholar
Bf-turbines. Turbine B100F, Bf-turbines.de, 2022, http://www.bf-turbines.de/ Google Scholar
Hawkturbine. Hawk 100R, Hawkturbine.com, 2022, http://www.hawkturbine.com/Hawk100R1.htm Google Scholar
Turbine Power Solutions Ltd. Wren Engine Sales and Service, Fuel Tubing, Pneumatic Fittings, RC Jets - Turbine Solutions, Turbinesolutions.co.uk, 2022, https://www.turbinesolutions.co.uk/ Google Scholar
Kumar, R., Kumar, V., Butt, M., Sheikh, N., Khan, S. and Afzal, A. Thermo-mechanical analysis and estimation of turbine blade tip clearance of a small gas turbine engine under transient operating conditions, Appl. Therm. Eng., 2020, 179, p 115700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benini, E. Progress in Gas Turbine Performance, Scitus Academics Llc, 2016, pp 107109.Google Scholar
Nascimento, M., De, L., Santos, E., et al. Micro Gas Turbine Engine: A Review, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ACARE, Protecting the environment and the energy supply | Acare, Acare4europe.org, https://www.acare4europe.org/sria/flightpath-2050-goals Google Scholar
Raja, V. and Fernandes, K. Reverse Engineering, Springer, 2010, London. Google Scholar
Gamil, A.A., Nikolaidis, T., Teixeira, J.A., Madani, S.H. and Izadi, A. Assessment of surface roughness effects on micro axial turbines, Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, 2021, vol. 84195, p V008T20A031.Google Scholar
Bai, T., Liu, J., Zhang, W. and Zou, Z. Effect of surface roughness on the aerodynamic performance of Turbine Blade Cascade, Propul. Power Res., 2014, 3, (2), pp 8289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Várady, T., Martin, R. and Cox, J. Reverse engineering of geometric models—an introduction, Computer-Aided Design, 1997, 29, (4), pp 255268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, F.C. Beautification of Reverse Engineered Geometric Models, PhD thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, Cardiff University, 2003.Google Scholar
Mahboubkhah, M., Aliakbari, M. and Burvill, C. An investigation on measurement accuracy of digitizing methods in turbine blade reverse engineering, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf., 2016, 232, (9), pp 16531671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohaghegh, K., Sadeghi, M. and Abdullah, A. Reverse engineering of turbine blades based on design intent, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2006, 32, (9-10), pp 10091020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
She, C. and Chang, C. Study of applying reverse engineering to turbine blade manufacture, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 2007, 21, (10), pp 15801584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Huang, X., Gong, C. and Wang, K. An engineering rules based parameterisation approach for turbine blade reverse engineering, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 2004, 292, (1), pp 311315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L.N., Zhang, D.H. and Liu, Y.P. Research on modeling turbine blade in reverse engineering, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2006, 532-533, pp 777780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakehal, D. Near-wall modeling of turbulent convective heat transport in film cooling of turbine blades with the aid of direct numerical simulation data, Journal of Turbomachinery, 2002, 124, (3), pp 485498. Available: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1482408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, X., Wang, S., Li, X. and Ren, J. Aerothermodynamic features of a Coriolis-applied smooth U channel for gas turbine blade, Int. J. Therm. Sci., 2024, 197, p 108815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sofi, A.Y. and Qayoum, A. Heat transfer and fluid flow characteristics in a two pass duct with variable rib shapes: a CFD analysis, Lect. Notes Mech. Eng., 2024, pp 457469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karczewski, M. and Błaszczak, J. Performance of three turbulence models in 3D flow investigation for a 1.5-stage turbine, Task Q., 2008, 12, (3-4), pp 185195.Google Scholar
Dong, P. and Amano, R.S. High-pressure gas turbine vane turbulent flows and heat transfer predicted by RANS/LES/DES, Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, vol. 5B, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Y., Li, Y., Cai, L.-X., Yao, J.-W. and Hou, Y.F. Research on automatic aerodynamic performance optimization for flue gas turbine blades under multiple conditions, Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, vol. 13D, v13dt34a009, 2023.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Suh, S., Baek, S. and Hwang, W. The effect of single-sided ribs on heat transfer and pressure drop within a trailing edge internal channel of a gas turbine blade, J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl., 2022, 14, (8), p 081005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, K., He, J. and Feng, Z.-P. Study on the mechanism of cross flow suppression and heat transfer enhancement of alternating elliptical leading edge impingement chamber, J. Eng. Thermophys., 2021, 42, (11), pp 28162823.Google Scholar
Ju, Y., Feng, Y. and Zhang, C. Conjugate heat transfer simulation and entropy generation analysis of gas turbine blades, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 2021, 143, (8), p 081012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiner, B.D.J., Wilson, M., Li, Y.S. and Sanga, C.M. Effect of purge on the secondary flow-field of a gas turbine blade-row, J. Turbomach., 2020, 142, (10), p 101006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saleh, Z., Avital, E.J. and Korakianitis, T. Effect of in-service burnout on the transonic tip leakage flows over flat tip model, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part A J. Power Energy, 2020, 234, (5), pp 655669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jimenez, J. Turbulent flows over rough walls, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 2004, 36, (1), pp 173196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flack, K.A., Schultz, M.P. and Shapiro, K.D. Experimental support for Townsend’s Reynolds number similarity hypothesis on rough walls, Phys. Fluids, 2005, (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANSYS CFX-Solver Theory Guide, ANSYS Inc., 2023.Google Scholar
Flack, K.A. and Schultz, M.P. Roughness effects on wall-bounded turbulent flows, Phys. Fluids, 2014, 26, p 101305. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alldieck, R., Seehausen, H., Herbst, F. and Seume, J.R. The effect of rough-wall boundary conditions on RANS-based transition prediction, Proceedings of Global Power, Propulsion Society, 2020.Google Scholar
Blocken, B., Stathopoulos, T. and Carmeliet, J. CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: Wall function problems, Atmos. Environ., 2007, 41, (2), pp 238252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TECHNOVENT. Technical/User Data Sheet: Platinum Cure Rubber-Z004, Technovent.com, 2022, http://www.technovent.com/Z004%20Instructions%20and%20MSDS.pdf.Google Scholar
Bondmaster. Two Part Epoxy Resin Technical Information Sheet, Farnell.com, 2022, http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/316730.pdf Google Scholar
Alicona, B. InfiniteFocusSL, Alicona.com, 2022, https://www.alicona.com/en/products/infinitefocussl/ Google Scholar
SHINING 3D, EinScan Pro 2X Plus-Handheld Industrial Scanner, EinScan, 2022, https://www.einscan.com/handheld-3d-scanner/2x-plus/ Google Scholar
Amornvit, P. and Sanohkan, S. The accuracy of digital face scans obtained from 3D scanners: an in vitro study, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2019, 16, (24), p 5061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daemen, J.H.T., Loonen, T.G.J., Verhulst, A.C., Maal, T.J.J., Maessen, J.G., Vissers, Y.L.J., Hulsewé, K.W.E. and de Loos, E.R. Three-dimensional imaging of the chest wall: a comparison between three different imaging systems, J. Surg. Res., 2020, 259, pp 332341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
manchestercfd. All there is to know about different mesh types in CFD!, Grc.nasa.gov, Manchestercfd.co.uk, 2020. [Online]. https://www.manchestercfd.co.uk/post/all-there-is-to-know-about-different-mesh-types-in-cfd Google Scholar
Simone, S., Montomoli, F., Martelli, F., Chana, K., Qureshi, I. and Povey, T. Analysis on the effect of a nonuniform inlet profile on heat transfer and fluid flow in turbine stages, J. Turbomach., 2011, 134, (1).Google Scholar
Sanders, D.D., O’Brien, W.F., Sondergaard, R., Polanka, M.D. and Rabe, D.C. Predicting separation and transitional flow in turbine blades at low Reynolds numbers—part I: development of prediction methodology, J. Turbomach., 2011, 133, (3), p 031011.Google Scholar
Kim, M., Lim, J., Kim, S., Jee, S. and Park, D. Assessment of the wall-adapting local eddy-viscosity model in transitional boundary layer, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 2020, 371, p 113287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odier, N., Duchaine, F., Gicouel, L., Dufour, G. and Park, D. Comparison of Les and Rans predictions with experimental results of the fan of a Turbofan, European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid Dynamics and Hermodynamics, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golchin, H., Ommi, F. and Saboohi, Z. Assessment of converting approach to efficient design of micro-turboprop engines, Chin. J. Aeronaut., 2020, 33, (2), pp 572588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saravanamuttoo, H. Gas Turbine Theory, 7th ed, Licensing Agency Ltd., 2017, London.Google Scholar
Rory Douglas Stieger. The Effects of Wakes on Separating Boundary Layers in Low Pressure Turbines, PhD thesis, Cambridge University Engineering Department, Cambridge, UK, 2002. [Online]. http://www-g.eng.cam.ac.uk/whittle/T106/T106A_cascade/T106A_cascade_publications/RStieger_PhD.pdf Google Scholar
Vanderwel, C. and Ganapathisubramani, B. Effects of spanwise spacing on large-scale secondary flows in rough-wall turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech., 2015, 774,pp. R2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coull, J., Clark, C. and Vazquez, R. The sensitivity of turbine cascade endwall loss to inlet boundary layer thickness, J. Global Power Propul. Soc., 2019, 3,pp. 540–554. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, F., Lötzerich, M., Cardamone, P., and Fottner, L. Surface roughness effects on turbine blade aerodynamics, J. Turbomach., 2005, 127, (3), p 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar