Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T20:06:54.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application of SysML for digital transformation of aircraft cabin systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2025

A. Hechelmann*
Affiliation:
Baden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State University (DHBW) Ravensburg, Campus Friedrichshafen 88045, Germany
T. Mannchen
Affiliation:
Baden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State University (DHBW) Ravensburg, Campus Friedrichshafen 88045, Germany
*
Corresponding author: A. Hechelmann; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Status information from avionics systems is typically transmitted to airlines, but aircraft cabin systems remain largely disconnected and frequently reliant on manual, paper-based logbooks for defect recording. This results in error-prone processes that compromise data consistency and complicate maintenance planning. Digitalisation offers solutions to these challenges by enabling predictive maintenance, real-time monitoring and streamlined data sharing, improving operational reliability and efficiency. However, developing such systems is inherently complex due to operational constraints and stringent safety and security regulations. Model-based Systems Engineering (MBSE) effectively manages complexity, provide standardised system visualisation and enhance multidisciplinary communication. From a methodological perspective, approaches from literature suitable for addressing aviation maintenance systems were selected and enhanced with allocation techniques and subsequently applied to create system models for both current and digitalised aircraft cabins. This paper showcases MBSE’s relevance to develop digitalised aircraft cabin systems by using the Systems Modeling Language (SysML) enabling stakeholders to visualise system architectures and to make better-informed design decisions. The analysis of the presented SysML models highlights the error-prone structure of current non-digitalised aircraft cabin systems while illustrating new use cases unlocked by digitalisation. A model-based comparison underscores the improved efficiency, reliability and predictive capabilities achieved through digital transformation. This study demonstrates that MBSE provides qualitative advantages in system development by enhancing stakeholder collaboration, clarifying complex system architectures, and providing actionable insights into system behaviour and improvements.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Syte, P. and Garcia, C.P. Health monitoring and prognostics, Airbus Tech. Mag., 2016, 58, pp 3641.Google Scholar
Continuing momentum for the i+sCabin2.0 research project, Boeing Glob. Serv., Aug. 2022, [Online]. https://services.boeing.com/news/continuing-momentum-i+scabin2-project Google Scholar
European Organization for Civil Aviation Equipment, Airworthiness security process specification: ED-202A, EUROCAE Workig Group 72, Malakoff, Jun. 2014. www.eurocae.net Google Scholar
Budeanu, D. and Markou, C. From Aircraft Health Monitoring to Aircraft Health Management, International Air Transport Association, Feb. 2022. [Online]. https://www.iata.org/contentassets/fafa409c883d41198aeb87628c848851/ahm-wp-1sted-2022.pdf Google Scholar
European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EC) No 216/2008, Official Journal of the European Union. [Online]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008R0216 Google Scholar
European Commision, Commission regulation (EU) No 965/2012, Official Journal of the European Union. [Online]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:296:0001:0148:En:PDF Google Scholar
Annex 6 – Operation of Aircraft – Part I – International Commercial Air Transport – Aeroplanes, International Civil Aviation Organization, Jul. 2022. https://store.icao.int/en/annex-6-operation-of-aircraft-part-i-international-commercial-air-transport-aeroplanes Google Scholar
Aviation Cyber Security Roundtable, International Air Transport Association, Singapur, 2019. [Online]. https://www.iata.org/contentassets/4c51b00fb25e4b60b38376a4935e278b/sin_roundtable_readout.pdf Google Scholar
European Aviation Safety Agency, Ed., CS-25 Amendment 25, Jun. 2020. [Online]. https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/cs-25_amendment_25.pdf Google Scholar
European Organization for Civil Aviation Equipment, ED-203A – Airworthiness security methods and considerations, no. ED-203A, 2018. https://eurocae.net/ Google Scholar
General acceptable means of compliance for Airworthiness of products, parts and appliances (AMC-20): subpart A – General AMC 20-42: airworthiness information security risk assessment, European Union Aviation Safety Agency, Dec. 2020. https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/easy-access-rules/online-publications/easy-access-rules-acceptable-means?page=21 Google Scholar
Flightpath 2050: Europe’s Vision for Aviation: Report on the High-Level Group on Aviation Research. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2011. https://op.europa.eu/de/publication-detail/-/publication/296a9bd7-fef9-4ae8-82c4-a21ff48be673Google Scholar
Hintze, H. and God, R. Using model-based security engineering in the development of complex aircraft cabin systems, SAE Int. J. Aerosp., Sep. 2015, 8, (1), pp 8996. doi: 10.4271/2015-01-2445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delligatti, L. SysML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Systems Modeling Language. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley, 2014.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization, Information technology — object management group systems modeling language (OMG SysML), 19514:2017, no. ISO/ IEC 19514. Genf.Google Scholar
Weilkiens, T., Lamm, J.G., Roth, S. and Walker, M. Model-Based System Architecture, Second Edition, 1st ed. Wiley, 2022. doi: 10.1002/9781119746683 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weilkiens, T., SYSMOD – The Systems modeling toolbox: Pragmatic MBSE with SysML, 3rd edition. In MBSE4U booklet series. Fredesdorf: MBSE4U, 2020.Google Scholar
International Council on Systems Engineering, Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities, 4th Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2015.Google Scholar
Friedenthal, S., Moore, A. and Steiner, R. A Practical Guide to SysML: The Systems Modeling Language, 3rd edition. Amsterdam; Boston, MA: Elsevier, MK, Morgan Kaufmann is an imprint of Elsevier, 2015.Google Scholar
Fei, X., Bin, C., Rui, L. and Shunhua, H. A model-based system engineering approach for aviation system design by applying SysML modeling, in 2020 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), Hefei, China: IEEE, Aug. 2020, pp 13611366. doi: 10.1109/CCDC49329.2020.9164443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, K., Robert, T., Shindman, D. and Olechowski, A. Integrating safety analysis into model-based systems engineering for aircraft systems: a literature review and methodology proposal, INCOSE Int. Symp., Jul. 2021, 31, (1), pp 9881003. doi: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2021.00882.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, G., Juknevicius, T., Armonas, A. and Post, K. Integrating safety and reliability analysis into MBSE: overview of the new proposed OMG standard, INCOSE Int. Symp., 2018, 28, (1), pp 13221336. doi: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2018.00551.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elakramine, F., Jaradat, R., Hossain, N.U.I., Banghart, M., Kerr, C. and El Amrani, S. Applying systems modeling language in an aviation maintenance system, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 2022, 69, (6), pp 40064018. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3089438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L., Wang, N., Ma, L. and Yang, Q. Modeling method of military aircraft support process based SysML, in The Proceedings of 2011 9th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, IEEE, pp 12471251. doi: 10.1109/ICRMS.2011.5979460 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roudier, Y. and Apvrille, L. SysML-Sec – a model driven approach for designing safe and secure systems, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development, ESEO, Angers, Loire Valley, France: SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, 2015, pp 655664. doi: 10.5220/0005402006550664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkermann, D. Potentials of integrating MBSE and LCA to handle uncertainties and variants in early design stages, in DS 119: Proceedings of the 33rd Symposium Design for X (DFX2022), The Design Society, 2022, pp 1010. doi: 10.35199/dfx2022.19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipšinić, Z. and Pavković, N. Integrating life cycle assessment in model-based systems engineering, Engineering for a Changing World: Proceedings:60th ISC, Ilmenau Scientific Colloquium, p 2023, Nov. 2023. doi: 10.22032/DBT.58905 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draft 2 of ARINC project paper 853: Cabin secure media-independent messaging (CSMIM) protocol, Feb. 2024. [Online]. https://aviation-ia.sae-itc.com/standards/853d2-draft-2-arinc-project-paper-853 Google Scholar
Stapf, U. and Marcus, D.L. SWISS international air lines introduces an electronic log nook (eTL/ELB), Aircr. IT Oper., 2017, 6, (2), pp 4649.Google Scholar
AMOS: An MRO software solution to create stories of success, Apr. 2024. [Online]. https://www.swiss-as.com/amos-mro Google Scholar
Trax: the world’s leading aviation maintenance mobile and cloud solutions, Apr. 2024. [Online]. https://www.trax.aero/site/ Google Scholar
Eichmann, O.C., Melzer, S., Giertzsch, F. and God, R. Stakeholder needs and requirements definition during service development in a system of systems, in 2020 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon), IEEE, pp 18. doi: 10.1109/SysCon47679.2020.9275889 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IOSA standards manual 12th edition, International Air Transport Association. [Online]. https://www.iata.org/contentassets/8658ac253f6848a79480a6da70c85d5f/iosa_standards_manualism_edition_12.pdf Google Scholar
Statement of principles and best practices regarding aircraft operational data (AOD), International Air Transport Association, 2024. [Online]. https://www.iata.org/contentassets/dc9952459208445ab801146f9e20194a/statement_of_principles_and_best_practices_regarding_aircraft_operational_data.pdf. [accessed: Jan. 20, 2025].Google Scholar