References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 February 2025
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language and PoliticsA Cross-Cultural Pragmatics Perspective, pp. 201 - 222Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Aichholzer, Julian and Willmann, Johanna. 2020. Desired personality traits in politicians: Similar to me but more of a leader. Journal of Research in Personality 88, 103990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 2004. Pragmatic markers in spoken interlanguage. Nordic Journal of English Studies 3(1): 173–190. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almanna, Ali, and House, Juliane. eds. 2023. Translation Politicised and Politics Translated. Berne: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Marta. 2021. The climate of climate change: Impoliteness as a hallmark of homophily in YouTube comment threads on Greta Thunberg’s environmental activism. Journal of Pragmatics 178: 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Dawn. 2008. Verbal aggression and impoliteness: Related or synonymous? In Bousfield, Derek and Locher, Miriam (eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 181–208. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208344.3.181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assmann, Alida, and Schwarz, Anja. 2012. Memory, migration and guilt. Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture 4(1): 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1386/cjmc.4.1.51_1.Google Scholar
Awwad, Mona. 2023. The failure of diplomatic mediations in the Syrian conflict: A comparative analysis. Queios. www.qeios.com/read/CLCHV3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayyad, Ahmad. 2012. Uncovering ideology in translation: A case study of Arabic and Hebrew translations of the ‘Roadmap Plan’. Journal of Language and Politics 11(2): 250–272. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.2.05ayy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Michael J. 1999. Argumentation and constructive interaction. In Coirier, Pierre and Andriessen, Jerry (eds.), Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press, 179–202.Google Scholar
Barbé, Esther, Herranz-Surrallés, Anna and Natorski, Michał. 2015. Contending metaphors of the European Union as a global actor. Journal of Language and Politics 14(1): 18–40. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.1.02bar.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence. 1992. Frames, concepts and conceptual fields. In Lehrer, Adrienne and Feder Kittay, Eva (eds.), Frames, Fields and Contrasts. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 21–74.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, M. C. 1989. The Moral Order of a Suburb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baxter, Judith. 2002. Competing discourses in the classroom: A post-structuralist discourse analysis of girls’ and boys’ speech in public contexts. Language in Society 13(6): 827–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013006760.Google Scholar
Beardsley, Kyle, Cunningham, David and White, Peter. 2018. Mediation, peacekeeping, and the severity of civil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution 63(7): 1682–1709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002718817092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2005. Frames revisited: The coherence-inducing function of frames. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 685–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika 2011. Approaching the data of pragmatics. In Bublitz, Wolfram and Norrick, Neal R. (eds.), Foundations of Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton, 537–560. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214260.537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendazzoli, Claudio. 2023. Breaching protocol and flouting norms on the European Parliament floor: Reactions from a micro- and macro-context perspective in 22 languages. Contrastive Pragmatics 4(1): 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, Ruth. 1946. The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture. Boston MA: Mariner.Google Scholar
Bennett, Adrian. 1981. Interruptions and the interpretation of conversation. Discourse Processes 4(2): 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538109544513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, William L. 1995. Accounts, Excuses and Apologies: A Theory of Image Restoration Strategies. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bercovitch, Jacob and Rubin, Jeffrey (eds.) 1994. Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bercovitch, Jacob and Gartner, Scott. 2007. Is there method in the madness of mediation? Some lessons for mediators from quantitative studies of mediation. International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations 32(4): 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050620601011024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beres, Louis. 2015. Defending Israel against Iranian nuclear aggression: War, genocide, and international law. Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs 9(2): 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/23739770.2015.1049400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, Jörg R. 1998. Introduction: Morality in discourse. Research on Language & Social Interaction 31(3/4): 279–294, DOI: 10.1080/08351813.1998.9683594.Google Scholar
Bergman, Marc L. and Kasper, Gabriele. 1991. The interlanguage of apologizing: Cross-cultural evidence. University of Hawai’i Working Papers in ESL 10(2): 139–176.Google Scholar
Bielsa, Esperança and Aguilera, Antonio. 2017. Politics of translation: A cosmopolitan approach. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 4(1): 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2016.1272428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björkman, Beyza. 2011. Pragmatic strategies in English as an academic lingua franca: Ways of achieving communicative effectiveness? Journal of Pragmatics 43(4): 950–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Scott. 2019. Faith-Based Diplomacy and Interfaith Dialogue. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, Robert, O’Donnell, Vincent and Blanchard, Caroline. 1979. Attack and defensive behaviors in the albino mouse. Aggressive Behavior 5(4): 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1979)5:4<341::AID-AB24800504033.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan and Verschueren, Jef. 1991. The pragmatics of minority politics in Belgium. Language in Society 20(4): 503–531. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, House, Juliane and Kasper, Gabriele. eds. 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Boese, Vanessa A. 2019. How (not) to measure democracy. International Area Studies Review 22(2): 95–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865918815571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolsover, Gillian. 2018. Slacktivist USA and authoritarian China? Comparing two political public spheres with a random sample of social media users. Policy and Internet 10(4): 454–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia. 2022. Morality, aggression, and social activism in a transmedia sports controversy. Language and Communication 84: 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutonnet, Thomas. 2011. From local control to globalised citizenship: The civilising concept of wenming in official Chinese rhetoric. In Neri, Corrado and Villard, Florent (eds.), Global Fences: Literatures, Limits, Borders. Lyon: Université Jean Moulin-Lyon, 79–103.Google Scholar
Brady, William, Wills, Julian, Burkart, Dominic, Jost, John and van Bavel, Jay. 2019. An ideological asymmetry in the diffusion of moralized content on social media among political leaders. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 148(10): 1802–1813. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braithwaite, John 2000. Repentance rituals and restorative justice. Journal of Political Philosophy 8(1): 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breeze, Ruth. 2016. Negotiating alignment in newspaper editorials: The role of concur–counter patterns. Pragmatics 26(1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.26.1.01bre.Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth. 2020. Exploring populist styles of political discourse in Twitter. World Englishes 39(4): 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Roy. 1999. When Sorry Isn’t Enough: The Controversy over Apologies and Reparations for Human Injustice. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Lucien and Prieto, Pilar. 2017. (Im)politeness: Prosody and gesture. In Culpeper, Jonathan, Haugh, Michael and Kádár, Dániel Z (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_14.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C.. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruff, Ian. 2013. The materiality of the body and the viscerality of protest. Keynote talk presented at the Heckler Symposium, Nottingham, July 2013.Google Scholar
Bull, Peter. 2013. The role of adversarial discourse in political opposition: Prime Minister’s questions and the British phone-hacking scandal. Language and Dialogue 3(2): 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.3.2.06bul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter. 2017. Collectivism and individualism in political speeches from the UK, Japan and the USA: A cross-cultural analysis. Politics, Culture and Socialisation 1(2): 71–84. https://doi.org/10.3224/pcs.v6i1-2.06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter and Fetzer, Anita. 2010. Face, facework and political discourse. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale 23(2/3): 155–183. www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-psychologie-sociale-2010-2-page-155.htm.Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, Fetzer, Anita and Kádár, Dániel Z. 2020. Calling Mr Speaker ‘Mr Speaker’: The strategic use of ritual references to the Speaker of the UK House of Commons. Pragmatics 30(1): 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19020.bul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 2006. Ideology and language. Journal of Political Ideologies 11(2): 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbaugh, Donal. 2007. Cultural discourse analysis: Communication practices and intercultural encounters. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 36(3): 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750701737090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalhaes, Claudio. 2011. ‘Gimme de kneebone bent’: liturgics, dance, resistance and a hermeneutics of the knees. Studies in World Christianity 14(1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1353/swc.0.0008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catford, J. C. 1964. A Linguistic Theory of Translation: An Essay in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Celermajer, Danielle. 2009. The Sins of the Nation and the Ritual of Apologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 2000. Loci in diversity and convergence in thought and language. In Pütz, Martin and Verspoor, Marjolijn (eds.), Explorations in Linguistic Relativity. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.199.08cha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Dennis. 1948. The combination of hecklers in the East of Scotland 1822 and 1827. Scottish Historical Review 27(104): 156–164. www.jstor.org/stable/25525959.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 1990. Politeness, politics and diplomacy. Discourse and Society 1(2): 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926590001002005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2011. Still something missing in CDA. Discourse Studies 13(6): 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611421360a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul and Schäffner, Christina. eds. 2002. Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chovanec, Jan. 2014. Pragmatics of Tense and Time in News: From Canonical Headlines to Online News Texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chovanec, Jan and Dynel, Marta. 2015. Researching interactional forms and participant structures in public and social media. In Dynel, Marta and Chovanec, Jan (eds.), Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.256.01cho.Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan. 2004. Bush’s and Gore’s language and gestures in the 2000 US presidential debates: A test case for two models of metaphors. Journal of Language and Politics 3(3): 409–440. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.3.04cie.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciftci, Hilal. 2022. Mediation as a diplomatic tool in Ottoman capitulations. Codrul Cosminului 28(1): 29–54. https://doi.org/10.4316/CC.2022.01.02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 2006. Pragmatics of language performance. In Horn, Laurence L. and Ward, Gregory (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford, Blackwell, 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959.ch16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coetzee, Wayne Stephen. 2020. Doing research on ‘sensitive topics’: Studying the Sweden–South Africa arms deal. Scientia Militaria: South African Journal of Military Studies 48(2). https://doi:10.5787/48-2-1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton: Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornejo, Marcela, Rubilar, Gabriela and Zapata-Sepúlveda, Pamela. 2019. Researching sensitive topics in sensitive zones: Exploring silences, ‘the normal’, and tolerance in Chile. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919849355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1979. On the sociolinguistic relevance of routine formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 3(3/4): 239–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(79)90033-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, Zhihai. 2004. Liang Qichao and Japan: On the eastern study background of Liang Qichao’s enlightenment thought. Modern History Research 4: 179–206.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Bousfield, Derek and Wichmann, Anne. 2002. Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1545–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, William, Nezlek, John and Banaji, Mahzarin. 2004. Implicit and explicit ethnocentrism: Revisiting the ideologies of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30(10): 1332–1346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dagtas, Banu. 2020. At the crossroads of the New Silk Road: News discourses in the Turkish press. Communication and the Public 4(4): 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047319896214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delanty, Gerard. 2009. The Cosmopolitan Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Fei, Zhang, Li and Wen, Xu. 2014. Exploring the non-symmetry of word derivation in Chinese–English translation: ‘Wenming’ for ‘Civilization’. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 4(3): 65–73. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2014.43034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1998. Monolingualism of the Other. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
De Seta, Gabriele. 2018. (Un)civil society in digital China, Wenming Bu Wenming: The socialization of incivility in postdigital China. International Journal of Communication 12: 21–30. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6219/2344.Google Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel, Godbout, Jean-François, Bei, Yu and Kaufmann, Stefan. 2012. Language and ideology in Congress. British Journal of Political Science 42: 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, Xiaochang and Mao, Zhixiang. 2000. Study of Official Documents in Ancient China. Hefei: Anhui Literature and Art Publishing House.Google Scholar
Dou, Weilin and Zhang, Xiaoying. 2007. Cross-cultural pragmatic analysis of evasion strategy at Chinese and American regular press conferences – with special reference to the North Korean nuclear issue. Caligrama (São Paulo. Online) 3(2). https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1808-0820.cali.2007.65490.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1999. Implicit Meanings: Selected Essays in Anthropology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2014. Requesting: From speech act to recruitment. In Drew, Paul and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (eds.), Requesting in Social Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.26.01dre.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunmire, Patricia L. 2012. Political discourse analysis: Exploring the language of politics and the politics of language. Language and Linguistic Compass 6(11): 735–751. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, Willis and House, Juliane. 1981. Let’s Talk and Talk About: A Pedagogic Interactional Grammar of English. München: Urban and Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Willis and House, Juliane. 2011 (4th ed). Einführung in die Sprachlehrforschung. Tübingen: Narr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, Willis House, Juliane and Kádár, Dániel Z. 2023. Expressions, Speech Acts and Discourse: A Pedagogic Interactional Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, Charlie, Siddharthan, Advaith and Wyner, Adam. 2016. Summarising the points made in online political debates. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Argument Mining, the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). Stroudsburg, PA, 134–143. www.aclweb.org/anthology/W16-2816.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Arthur A. 1958. Speech blocks: How to deal with them. Today’s Speech 6(3): 13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbank, John K. 1982. The Cambridge History of China. Volume 12, Republican China 1912–1949. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela and Fairclough, Normal. 2012. Argument, deliberation, dialectic and the nature of the political: A CDA perspective. Political Studies Review 11: 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 3(2): 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1996. A reply to Henry Widdowson’s discourse analysis: A critical view. Language and Literature 5(1): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709600500105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. ‘Political correctness’: The politics of culture and language. Discourse & Society 14(1): 17–28. https://doi/org/10.1177/0957926503014001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2010. Language and ideology. In Fairclough, Norman (ed.), Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 9–27.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles and Turner, Mark. 2008. Rethinking metaphor. In Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita ed. 2013. The Pragmatics of Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Lauerbach, Gerda. (eds.). 2007. Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Norma. 1995. The difficulty of apology: Japan’s struggle with memory and guilt. Japan Quarterly 42(4): 405–418.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin, 111–137.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. 1986. Free speech and social structure. Faculty Scholarship Series (online). http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1210.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Andrew. 2003. Humanism and America: An Intellectual History of English Colonisation, 1500–1625. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, John. 2018. Critical discourse studies and context. In Flowerdew, John and Richardson, John E. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. New York: Routledge, 165–178.Google Scholar
Fousek, John. 2000. To Lead the Free World: American Nationalism and the Cultural Roots of the Cold War. Chapel Hill and London: University North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Fendrick, Reed J. 2012. Diplomacy as an instrument for national power. In J. Boone Bartholomees (ed.), U.S. Army War College Guide to National Security Policy and Strategy. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep12115.16.pdf.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2008. The expression of non-alignment in British and German political interviews: Preferred and dispreferred variants. Functions of Language 15(1): 35–63. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.15.1.04fet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Elie. 2017. Evasion strategies in international documents: When ‘constructive ambiguity’ leads to oppositional interpretation. Critical Discourse Studies 14(4): 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1292932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Elie, Kampf, Zohar and Balmas, Meital. 2017. Exploring message targeting at home and abroad: The role of political and media considerations in the rhetorical dynamics of conflict resolution. International Journal of Communication 11: 1597–1617. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4658.Google Scholar
Furko, Peter. 2017. Manipulative uses of pragmatic markers in political discourse. Palgrave Communications 3, 17054. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan. 1989. Language and political economy. Annual Review of Anthropology 18: 345–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2015. Politics of translation. Annual Review of Anthropology 44: 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geis, Michael L. 1995. Speech Acts and Conversational Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1964. Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities. Social Problems 11(3): 225–250. https://doi.org/10.2307/798722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander L. 1991. Forceful Persuasion: Diplomacy as an Alternative to War. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Gibney, Mark, Howerd-Hassmann, Rhoda E., Coicaud, Jean-Mark and Steiner, Niklaus. eds. 2008. The Age of Apology. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
Gilboa, Eytan. 2001. Diplomacy in the media age: Three models of uses and effects. Diplomacy and Statecraft 12(2): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592290108406201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaurdic, Josip. 2013. The owl of Minerva flies only at dusk? British diplomacy on the eve of Yugoslav wars. East European Politics & Societies 27(3): 545–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254134847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1979. Footing. Semiotica 25(1–2): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, Karen. 2002. Politeness or impoliteness? Verbal play on the hospital ward. Retrieved from https://extra.shu.ac.uk/wpw/politeness/grainger.htm.Google Scholar
Gu, Chonglong. 2018. Mediating ‘face’ in triadic political communication: A CDA analysis of press conference interpreters’ discursive (re)construction of Chinese government’s image (1998–2017). Critical Discourse Studies 16(2): 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1538890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, Ming Dong. 2012. Sinologism: An Alternative to Orientalism and Postcolonialism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guan, Shilin. 2017. Wan Qing Yingguo zhuHua waijiao daibiao jiguan yinxin, gongwen-de ‘Zhongguo-hua’ 晚清英國駐華外交代表機關印信、公文的‘中國化’ [The sinicization of official seals and papers of British diplomatic establishments in China in late Qing]. Journal of National Museum of China 166(5): 124–139.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne. 1996. The prosodic contextualization of moral work: An analysis of reproaches in ‘why’-formats. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, Selting, Margaret and Drew, Paul (eds.), Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 271–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Weidong. 2003. ‘Zhaohui’ yi Zhongguo waijiao wenshu jindai fanshi de chugou ‘照會’與中國外交文書近代範式的初構 [The ‘diplomatic note’ and the initial format of modern diplomatic documents in China]. Historical Research 3: 92–102.Google Scholar
Gürkan, Emrah. 2015. Mediating boundaries: Mediterranean go-betweens and cross-confessional diplomacy in Constantinople, 1560–1600. Journal of Early Modern History 19(2–3): 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700658-12342453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society (trans. McCarthy, T.). New York: Beacon.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. (revised by C. Matthiessen). 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halmari, Helena. 2008. On the language of the Clinton–Dole presidential campaign debates: General tendencies and successful strategies. Journal of Language and Politics 7(2): 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.2.04hal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, Shiyuan. 2004. The origin of the Chinese word ‘nationality’. Ethnic Study 6: 60–69 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Harré, Rom. 1987. Enlarging the paradigm. New Ideas in Psychology 5 (1): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(87)90039-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra. 1991. Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In Scannell, Peter (ed.), Broadcast Talk. London: Sage, 76–79.Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra. 2001. Being politically impolite: Extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse. Discourse & Society 12(4): 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012004003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra, Grainger, Karen and Mullany, Louise. 2006. The pragmatics of political apologies. Discourse and Society 17(6): 715–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506068429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2013. Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order. Journal of Pragmatics 58, 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, Kádár, Dániel Z and Reiter, Rosina Márquez. Eds. 2023. Offence and Morality, special issue, Language & Communication 87.Google Scholar
He, Ping. 2007. The concept and enlightenment of civilization: China and Europe. Research on Historical Theory 4: 22–33 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
He, Yinan. 2007. Remembering and forgetting the war: Elite mythmaking, mass reaction, and Sino-Japanese relations, 1950–2006. History and Memory 19(2): 43–74. https://doi.org/10.2979/his.2007.19.2.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hein, Patrick. 2010. Patterns of war reconciliation in Japan and Germany: A comparison. East Asia 27(2): 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-010-9106-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepple, Chris. 2003. The politics of speech act theory. Journal of Language Culture and Communication 5(2): 1–10.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan. ed. 1996. Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, Matt. 2015. Location, location, location: Citizen-fan journalists’ ‘set reporting’ and info-war in the digital age. In Geraghty, Lincold (ed.), Popular Media Cultures. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137350374_9.Google Scholar
Hinkel, Eli. 1997. Appropriateness of advice: DCT and multiple choice data. Applied Linguistics 28(1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirata, Keiko and Warschauer, Mark. 2014. Japan: The Paradox of Harmony. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hodge, Bob and Kam, Louie. 1998. The Politics of Chinese Language and Culture: The Art of Reading Dragons. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Mark. 1991. Restructuring, reconstruction, reinscription, rearticulation: Four voices in critical interaction theory. Millenium 20(2): 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190463427.003.0005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Marc. 2008. Ethnocentrism. In Darity, William A. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. 2nd Edition. New York, McMillan, 11–12.Google Scholar
Hoppe-Graff, Siegfried, Herrmann, Theo, Winterhoff-Spurk, Peter and Mangold, Roland. 1985. Speech and situation: A general model for the process of speech production. In Forgas, Joseph P. (ed.), Language and Social Situations. New York: Springer, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horelt, Michel-Andre von. 2019. Dramas of Reconciliation: A Performance Approach to the Analysis of Political Apologies in International Relations. Berlin: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, Paul. 2011. School bullying and social and moral orders. Children & Society 25 (4): 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2011.00377.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane. 1971. Theoretical Aspects of Translation. MA thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
House, Juliane. 1973. Of the limits of translatability. Babel 19: 166–167. https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.19.4.06hou.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane. 1977. A model of assessing translation quality. Meta 22: 103–109. https://doi.org/10.7202/003140ar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane. 1986. Acquiring translational competence in interaction. In House, Juliane and Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (eds.), Interlingual and Intercultural Communication: Discourse and Cognition in Translation and Second Language Acquisition Studies. Tübingnen: Narr, 179–192.Google Scholar
House, Juliane. 1989. Politeness in English and German: The functions of please and bitte. In Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, House, Juliane and Kasper, Gabriele (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 96–119.Google Scholar
House, Juliane. 1996. Contrastive discourse analysis and misunderstanding. In Hellinger, Marlis and Ammon, Ulrich (eds.), Contrastive Sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane. 1997. Translation Quality Assessment: A Model Revisited. Berlin: Narr.Google Scholar
House, Juliane. 2006. Communicative styles in English and German. European Journal of English Studies 10(3): 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825570600967721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane. 2015. Translation Quality Assessment: Past and Present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
House, Juliane. 2024. Translation: The Basics. 2nd Edition. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
House, Juliane and Kádár, Dániel Z. 2020. T/V pronouns in global communication practices: The case of IKEA catalogues across linguacultures. Journal of Pragmatics 161: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane and Kádár, Dániel Z. 2021a. Altered speech act indication: A contrastive pragmatic study of English and Chinese Thank and Greet expressions. Lingua 264: 103162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane and Kádár, Dániel Z. 2021b. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juliane, House and Kádár, Dániel Z. 2023. Speech acts and interaction in second language pragmatics: A position paper. Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane and Kádár, Dániel Z, Liu, Fengguang and Song, Yulong. 2023. Aggression in diplomatic notes: A pragmatic analysis of a Chinese–American conflict in times of colonisation. Text & Talk 43(6): 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2021-0036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Xingtao. 2007. The formation and historical practice of modern concepts of ‘civilization’ and ‘culture’ in the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China. Knowledge of Literature and History 3: 153–160 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Hudson, James and Bruckman, Amy. 2004. The bystander effect: A lens for understanding patterns of participation. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13(2): 165–195. www.jstor.org/stable/1466904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ide, Sachiko. 1989. Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua 8(2–3): 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ihalainen, Pasi. 2006. Between historical semantics and pragmatics: Reconstructing past political thought through conceptual history. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 7(1): 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.7.1.06iha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2003. Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and Politics 2(1): 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.2.1.05ili.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izadi, Ahmad. 2015. Persian honorifics and im/politeness as social practice. Journal of Pragmatics 85: 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Geert. 2011. Press conferences on the internet: Technology, mediation and access in the news. Journal of Pragmatics 43(7): 1900–1911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Geert, Pander Maat, Henk and van Hout, Tom. 2008. The discourse of news management. Pragmatics 18(1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18.1.01jac.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott. 1982. The Rhetoric of Witnessing and Heckling: A Case Study in Ethnorhetoric. PhD Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott. 2002. Maintaining neutrality in dispute mediation: Managing disagreement while managing not to disagree. Journal of Pragmatics 34(10–11): 1403–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00071-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Scott and Jackson, Sally. 1993. Failures in higher order conditions in the organization of witnessing and heckling episodes. In: van Eemeren, Frans H., Jacobs, Scott and Jackson, Sally (eds.), Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press, 140–169.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, Peter Vigo. 2011. Pushing the limits of military coercion theory. International Studies Perspectives 12(2): 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2011.00425.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1959. On linguistic aspects of translation. In Brower, Reuben A. (ed.), On Translation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 233–239.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, Kerstin and Lindblom, Jonas. 2017. Animal Rights Activism. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, Adam and Coupland, Nicholas. Eds. 1999. The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jiang, Xiangying. 2006. Cross-cultural pragmatic differences in US and Chinese press conferences: The case of the North Korea Nuclear crisis. Discourse & Society 17(2): 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Mel. 2011. Heckle, hiss, howl and holler. Arts & the Public Sphere 1(2): 117–119. https://doi.org/10.1386/aps.1.2.117_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas. 2005. Mass media communication from the seventeenth to the twenty-first century. In Skaffari, Anne, Peikola, Matti, Carroll, Ruth, Hiltunen, Risto and Wårvik, Brita (eds.), Opening Windows on Texts and Discourses of the Past. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.134.04juc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas and Taavitsainen, Irma. 2008. Apologies in the history of English: Routinized and lexicalized expressions of responsibility and regret. In Jucker, Andreas and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Speech Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 195–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2007. Terms of (Im)Politeness: On the Communicational Properties of Historical Chinese Terms of Address. Budapest: Eotvos Lorand University Press.Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2012. Historical Chinese politeness and rhetoric. A case study of epistolary refusals. Journal of Politeness Research 8(1): 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2012-0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107280465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2024. Ritual and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108624909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. and House, Juliane. 2019. Ritual frames: A contrastive pragmatic approach. Pragmatics 30(1): 142–168. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19018.kad.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. and Marquez-Reiter, Rosina. 2016. (Im)politeness and (im)morality: Insights from intervention. Journal of Politeness Research 11(2): 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0010.Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., Parvaresh, Vahid and Ning, Puyu. 2019. Morality, moral order, and language conflict and aggression: A position paper. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7(1): 6–31. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00017.kad.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. and Ran, Yongping. 2015. Ritual in intercultural contact: A metapragmatic case study of heckling. Journal of Pragmatics 77: 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.12.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. and Zhang, Sen. 2019. Alignment, ‘politeness’ and implicitness in Chinese political discourse: A case study of the 2018 vaccine scandal. Journal of Language and Politics 18(5): 698–717. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18053.kad.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampf, Zohar. 2008. The pragmatics of forgiveness: Judgments of apologies in the Israeli political arena. Discourse & Society 19(5): 577–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508092244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampf, Zohar. 2009. Public (non-)apologies: The discourse of minimizing responsibility. Journal of Pragmatics 41(11): 2257–2270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampf, Zohar. 2012. From ‘There are no Palestinian people’ to ‘Sorry for their suffering’: Israeli discourse of recognition of the Palestinians. Journal of Language and Politics 11(3): 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.3.06kam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampf, Zohar. 2015. Political discourse analysis. In Tracy, Karen (ed.), The International Encyclopaedia of Language and Social Interaction. New York: Wiley, 1–17.Google Scholar
Kampf, Zohar, Aldar, Lee, Danziger, Roni and Schreiber, Mia. 2019. The pragmatics of amicable interstate communication. Intercultural Pragmatics 16(2): 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2019-0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampf, Zohar and Löwenheim, Nava. 2012. Rituals of apology in the global arena. Security Dialogue 43(1): 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010611431095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid. 2010. The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Politics 9(1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.1.01kho.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid and Zia, Mahrou. 2014. Persian nationalism, identity and anti-Arab sentiments in Iranian Facebook discourses: Critical discourse analysis and social media communication. Journal of Language and Politics 13(4): 755–780. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.4.08kho.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Dam Hee and Kwak, Nojin. 2022. When does incidental exposure prompt political participation? Cross-national research on the importance of individualism and collectivism. International Journal of Communication 16: 1737–1758. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17479/3735.Google Scholar
Kirsch, Helen and Welzel, Christian. 2019. Democracy misunderstood: Authoritarian notions of democracy around the globe. Social Forces 98(1): 59–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissine, Mikhail. 2013. From Utterances to Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, Hans. 2005. The Idea of Nationalism: A Study in Its Origins and Background. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Lefteroff, Korey, Lindsay, . 2005. Excessive heckling and violent behaviour at sporting events: A legal solution? University of Miami Business Law Review 119: 134–135. https://repository.law.miami.edu/umblr/vol14/iss1/4.Google Scholar
Körner, Robert, Overbeck, Jennifer, Körner, Erik and Schütz, Astrid. 2022. How the linguistic styles of Donald Trump and Joe Biden reflect different forms of power. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 41(6): 631–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221085309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krzy, żanowski, Michal and Tucker, Joshua. 2018. Re/constructing politics through social & online media: Discourses, ideologies, and mediated political practices. Journal of Language and Politics 17(6): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18007.krz.Google Scholar
Laineste, Liisi. 2011. Politics of state in a post-socialist state: A case study. In Tsakona, Villy and Popa, Diana Elena (eds.), Studies in Political Humour: In between Political Critique and Public Entertainment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 217–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1995. Metaphor, morality, and politics, or, why conservatives have left liberals in the dust. Social Research 62(2): 177–213. www.degruyter.com/database/COGBIB/entry/cogbib.7062/html.Google Scholar
Lange, Deborah. 2010. Examples of diplomatic behavior: Backroom-bargaining and negotiations. In Lange, Deborah (ed.), Power and Influence. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 121–135 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
László, Ervin. 2013. Individualism, Collectivism, and Political Power: A Relational Analysis of Ideological Conflict. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ledoux, Sarah and Bull, Peter. 2017. Order in disorder: Audience responses and political rhetoric in speeches from the second round of the 2012 French presidential election. Pragmatics and Society 8(4): 520–541. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.4.03led.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Seung-Hee and Tanaka, Hiroko. 2016. Affiliation and alignment in responding actions. Journal of Pragmatics 100: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee-Wong, Song Mei. 2009. Discourse as communicative action: Validation of China’s new socio-cultural paradigm Qiye wenhua ‘enterprise culture’. Pragmatics 19(2): 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19.2.04lee.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2007. Politeness: Is there an East–West divide? Journal of Politeness Research 3(2): 167–206. https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2008. Language in Literature: Style and Foregrounding. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levenson, Joseph R. 1953. Liang Ch’i-ch’ao and the Mind of Modern China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 2017. Speech acts. In Huang, Yan (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 199–216.Google Scholar
Lewiński, Marcin. 2010. Internet Political Discussion Forums as an Argumentative Activity Type: A Pragmadialectical Analysis of Online Forms of Strategic Manoeuvring in Reacting Critically. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers.Google Scholar
Liang, Zhiping. 2020. Civilization confronted with test: Discourse change of contemporary Chinese civilization. Zhejiang Social Sciences 4: 4–12 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Lind, Jennifer. 2009. Apologies in international politics. Security Studies 18(3): 517–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Wenming. 2010. The concept of wenming in China and Europe before the middle of the 19th century. Journal of Capital Normal University 5: 130–137 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Luke, Allan. 1997. The material effects of the word: Apologies, ‘stolen children’ and public discourse. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 18(3): 343–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630970180303.Google Scholar
Lyddon, Peter. 1996. The Fall and Rise of Coercive Diplomacy in the Balkans. Doctoral dissertation, United States Army Command and General Staff College, Kansas.Google Scholar
Ma, Laurence. 2005. Urban administrative restructuring, changing scale relations and local economic development in China. Political Geography 24(4): 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maley, Yon. 1995. From adjudication to mediation: Third party discourse in conflict resolution. Journal of Pragmatics 23(1): 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00030-I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, Yansheng and Zhao, Xin. 2020. A discursive approach to disagreements expressed by Chinese spokespersons during press conferences. Discourse, Context and Media 37, 100428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinelli, Maurizio. 2008. How to build a ‘Beautiful China’ in the anthropocene: The political discourse and the intellectual debate on ecological civilization. Journal of Chinese Politeness Science 23: 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-018-9538-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Márquez-Reiter, Rosina. 2022. Translocalisation of values, relationality and offence. Language & Communication 84: 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Márquez-Reiter, Rosina and Haugh, Michael. 2019. Denunciation, blame and the moral turn in public life. Discourse, Context & Media 28: 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marrus, Michael R. 2007. Official apologies and the quest for historical justice. Journal of Human Rights 6(1): 75–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754830601098402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, Michael E., Fincham, Frank D. and Tsang, Jo-Ann. 2003. Forgiveness, forbearance, and time: The temporal unfolding of transgression-related interpersonal motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84(3): 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.84.3.540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIlvenny, Paul. 1996. Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal audience participation in popular discourse. Language in Society 27: 27–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450002042X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Michael. 2001. Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of approaches to CDA. In Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 14–31.Google Scholar
Mills, Sara and Kádár, Dániel Z. 2011. Politeness and culture. In Kádár, Dániel Z and Mills, Sara (eds.), Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna. 2013. Towards a pragma-linguistic framework for the study of sensationalism in news headlines. Discourse & Communication 7(2): 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312471668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2002. Colonisation, globalisation, and the future of languages in the twenty-first century. International Journal on Multicultural Societies 4(2): 162–193.Google Scholar
Munday, Jeremy. 2012. A translation studies perspective on the translation of political concepts. In Burke, Martin and Richter, Melvin (eds.), Why Concepts Matter: Translating Social and Political Thought. Leiden: Brill, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004194908_003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Lyle. 2012. The animal rights movement in theory and practice: A review of the sociological literature. Sociology Compass 6(2): 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00440.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murau, Daniela. 2012. Strategic maneuvering in diplomatic mediation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 1(3): 331–377. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.1.3.04mur.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, James. 2015. Revisiting the apology as a speech act: The case of parliamentary apologies. Journal of Language and Politics 14(2): 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.2.01mur.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2011. Metaphor in political dialogue. Language and Dialogue 1(2): 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.1.2.02mus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2021. Researching political metaphor cross-culturally: English, Hungarian, Greek and Turkish L1-based interpretations of the Nation as Body metaphor. Journal of Pragmatics 183: 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.07.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakajima, Keiko. 2002. The Key to Intercultural Communication: A Comparative Study of Speech Act Realization of Sympathy/Empathy. PhD thesis, University of Mississippi.Google Scholar
Natsheh, Bayan and Atawneh, Ahmad. 2021. Image polishing in Trump’s digital campaign: The case of speech act of persuasion. Hebron University Research Journal 16(1): 292–322.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lisa. 2002. Protecting the common good: Technology, objectivity, and privacy. Public Administration Review 62(1): 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.62.s1.12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Tao Thi Phuong. 2012. The Discourse of Wenming (‘Civilisation’): Moral Authority and Social Change in Contemporary Shanghai. Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene A. 1964. Toward a Science of Translating: With Special Reference to Principles and Procedures Involved in Bible Translating. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nida, Eugene A. and Taber, Charles. 1969. The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Nobles, Melissa. (ed.) 2008. The Politics of Official Apologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal. 1987. Functions of repetition in conversation. Text 7(3): 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1987.7.3.245.Google Scholar
Obeng, Samuel G. 1997. Language and politics: Indirectness in political discourse. Discourse & Society 8(1): 49–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008001004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1979. Introduction: What child language can contribute to pragmatics. Ochs, In Elinor and Schieffelin, Bambi (eds.), Developmental Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 1–20.Google Scholar
Osojnik, Janez. 2022. Predlog Socialistične stranke Slovenije oktobra 1990 za izvedbo plebiscita o samostojnosti Republike Slovenije in odzivi nanj v Sloveniji. Studia Historica Slovenica 22(2): 463–502.Google Scholar
Páez, Darío. 2010. Peticiones de perdón públicas o disculpas políticas y mejora de relaciones intergrupo: Un marco de análisis neo-Durkheimiano a las disculpas oficiales en tanto rituales. Revista de Psicología Social 25(1): 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347410790193504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Yuling and Kádár, Dániel Z. 2011. Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2012. Corpus analysis of political language. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parvaresh, Vahid. 2018. ‘We are going to do a lot of things for college tuition’: Vague language in the 2016 U.S. presidential debates. Corpus Pragmatics 2: 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-017-0029-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parvaresh, Vahid. 2022. On the morality of taking offence. Language & Communication 87: 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parvaresh, Vahid and Tayebi, Tamineh. 2018. Impoliteness, aggression and the moral order. Journal of Pragmatics 132: 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pask-Hughes, Alexander. 2013. A critical discourse analysis approach to media framing of activists use of Twitter. In Twitter and Microblogging: Political, Professional and Personal Practices. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/68570.Google Scholar
Pérez-González, Luis. 2012. Translation, interpreting and the genealogy of conflict. Journal of Language and Politics 11(2): 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planken, Brigitte. 2005. Managing rapport in lingua franca sales negotiations: A comparison of professional and aspiring negotiators. English for Specific Purposes 24(4): 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1954. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony. 2006. Globalization and the politics of translation studies. Meta 51(4): 744–757. https://doi.org/10.7202/014339ar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qu, Wensheng. 2017. ‘Wangxia Tiaoyue’ dingli qinghou Zhong-Mei wanglai zhaohui ji fanyi huodong yanjiu 《望廈條約》訂立前後中美往來照會及翻譯活動研究 (Research of communications between China and US and the translation activities of Caleb Cushing’s mission to China in 1844). Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition) 1: 113–126.Google Scholar
Rahmani, Hossein. 2022. Avoiding sincere apologies among Iranian politicians and its cultural justification: A pragmatic study. Language Related Research 13(2): 285–319. https://doi.org/10.52547/LRR.13.2.10.Google Scholar
Ran, Yongping and Zhao, Linsen. 2018. Building mutual affection-based face in conflict mediation: A Chinese relationship management model. Journal of Pragmatics 129: 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, Sameer. 2011. ‘Joke’s on You!’ Stand-Up Comedy Performance and the Management of Hecklers. Master’s thesis. https://bit.ly/4dO4hjP.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth. 2001. The discourse historical approach. In Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Sage, 87–121.Google Scholar
Renner, Judith. 2015. Germany–Czech Republic. In Daase, Christopher, Engert, Stefan, Horelt, Michel-André, Renner, Judith and Strassner, Renate (eds.), Apology and Reconciliation in International Relations: The Importance of Being Sorry. London: Routledge, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repe, Bozo. 2002. Jutri je nov dan: Slovenci in razpad Jugoslavije. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga.Google Scholar
Repe, Bozo. 2004. Viri o demokratizaciji in osamosvojitvi Slovenije (III. del: osamosvojitev in mednarodno priznanje). Viri 19. Ljubljana: Arhivsko društvo Slovenije.Google Scholar
Richley, Sean. 2009. Hierarchy in political discussion. Political Communication 26(2): 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600902851419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Craige. 2018. Speech acts in discourse context. In Fogal, Daniel, Harris, Daniel and Moss, Dan (eds.), New Work on Speech Acts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 317–359. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198738831.003.0012.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Cynthia. 2021. Do you hear the people sign? A critical discourse analysis of comments on a 2015 online petition opposing North Carolina’s ag-gag law. Journal of Applied Communication Research 49(5): 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2021.1965185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosoux, Valérie. 2022. How not to mediate conflict. International Affairs 98(5): 1717–1735. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, Hiro. 2015. The cultural pragmatics of political apology. Cultural Sociology 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975515590243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santora, Kimberley. 2013. Exploring Self-Orientation in Personal Narratives of Mental Health among a Latino Clinical Sample. PhD thesis, Northeastern University, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Šaric, Liljana. 2010. Domestic and foreign media images of the Balkans. In Šarić, Ljiljana, Musolff, Andreas, Manz, Stefan and Hudabiunigg, Ingrid (eds.), Contesting Europe’s Eastern Rim: Cultural Identities in Public Discourse. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Frederic. 1997. Political concepts and the study of democracy: The case of Demokaraasi in Senegal. Political and Legal Anthropology Review 20(1): 40–49. www.jstor.org/stable/24497983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Frederic. 2000. Democracy in Translation: Understanding Politics in an Unfamiliar Culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Frederic. 2012. The boundaries of transnational democracy: Alternatives to the all-affected principle. Review of International Studies 38(2): 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510001749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Frederic and Gagnon, Jean-Paul. 2023. Democracies across cultures: The hegemonic concept of democracy has dissolved, what happens now? Democratic Theory 10(1): 91–104. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2023.100107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäffner, Christina. 2002. Political discourse analysis from the point of view of translation studies. Journal of Language and Politics 3(1): 117–150. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.1.09sch.Google Scholar
Schäffner, Christina. 2004. Metaphor and translation: Some implications of a cognitive approach. Journal of Pragmatics 36(7): 1253–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäffner, Christina. 2012. Unknown agents in translated political discourse. Target 24(1): 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.24.1.07sch.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schank, Roger and Abelson, Robert. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schettino, Ilario. 2011. Is coercive diplomacy a viable means to achieve political objectives? www.e-ir.info/pdf/1693.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Amanda. 2005. Modelling Speech Acts in Conversational Discourse. PhD thesis, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Sclafani, Jennifer. 2017. Talking Donald Trump: A Sociolinguistic Study of Style, Metadiscourse, and Political Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scott, Kate. 2021. The pragmatics of rebroadcasting content on Twitter: How is retweeting relevant? Journal of Pragmatics 184: 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.07.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 1975. A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setiyadi, Desi, Hersulastuti, Hersulastuti and Widayanti, Siti. 2018. The Second Workshop on Language, Literature and Society for Education. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-12-2018.2282790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharoff, Serge, Rapp, Reinhard, Zweigenbaum, Pierre and Fung, Pascale. 2013. Building and Using Comparable Corpora. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shire, Mohammed. 2020. Dialoguing and negotiating with Al-Shabaab: The role of clan elders as insider-partial mediators. Journal of Eastern African Studies 15(1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2020.1863099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi-Xu, . 2012. Why do cultural discourse studies? Towards a culturally conscious and critical approach to human discourses. Critical Arts 26(4): 484–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2012.723814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2009. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, Maria. 2013. The impact of globalisation on politeness and impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 55: 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, Daniel N. 2019. The pragmatics of chaos: Parsing Bolsarano’s undemocratic language. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada 59(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/01031813685291420200409.Google Scholar
Silverthorne, Collin P. and Mazmanian, Lee. 1975. The effects of heckling and media of presentation on the impact of a persuasive communication. Journal of Social Psychology 96(2): 229–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siniver, Asaf. 2006. Power, impartiality and timing: Three hypotheses on third party mediation in the Middle East. Political Studies 54(4): 806–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00635.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siniver, Asaf. 2022. The power to blame as a source of leverage: International mediation and ‘Dead Cat Diplomacy’. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 17: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Dan. 2012. Language and discourse in conflict and conflict resolution. Current Issues in Language and Society 4(3): 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13520529709615498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Graham, John, Peter and Sturgis, Patrick. 2013. Taking political engagement online: An experimental analysis of asynchronous discussion forums. Political Studies 61(4): 709–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00989.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nick. 2013. An overview of challenges facing public apologies. In Cuypers, Daniël, Janssen, Daniel, Haers, Jacques and Segaert, Barbara (eds.), Public Apology between Ritual and Regret. Leiden: Brill, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Sonia. 2006. Where do hecklers come from? The origins of booing (online). https://bit.ly/3XhbkdT.Google Scholar
Sotirova, Nadezhda. 2021. ‘Good job, but Bulgarian’: Identifying ‘Bulgarian-ness’ through cultural discourse analysis. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 14(2): 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2020.1760919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2000. Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In Spencer-Oatey, Helen (ed.), Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. London: Continuum, 11–46.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen and Kádár, Dániel Z. 2015. The bases of (im)politeness evaluations: Culture, the moral order and the East–West debate. East Asian Pragmatics 1(1): 73–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/eap.v1i1.29084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen and Xing, Jianyu. 2019. Interdisciplinary perspectives on interpersonal relations and the evaluation process: Culture, norms, and the moral order. Journal of Pragmatics 151: 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1999. Context and Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Ernesto. 2005. Preface. In Stein, Ernesto (ed.), The Politics of Policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, v–viii.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2006. ‘No no no’ and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research 30(2): 260–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00733.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stopfner, Maria. 2013. Streitkultur im Parlament: Linguistische Analyse der Zwischenrufe im österreichischen Nationalrat. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Sugiyama Lebra, Takie. 1983. Shame and guilt: A psychocultural view of the Japanese self. Ethos 11(3): 192–209. www.jstor.org/stable/639973.Google Scholar
Sun, Qiuyun. 2006. Civilization: Connotation and changes – an analysis of an important concept in humanities and social sciences research. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology 2: 48–53 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Svensson, Isak and Lindgen, Mathilda. 2013. Peace from the inside: Exploring the role of the insider-partial mediator. International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations 39(5): 698–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2013.834261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, Elizabeth Anne. 2015. Language, (Impoliteness) and Diplomacy: The Zinoviev Letter Affair. PhD thesis, University of Trieste.Google Scholar
Tagar, Michal R., Morgan, Scott, Halperin, Eran and Skitka, Lida J.. 2014. When ideology matters: Moral conviction and the association between ideology and policy preferences in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology 44: 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1979. What’s in a frame? Service evidence for underlying expectations. In Friedl, Roy (ed.), New Directions in Discourse Processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Tavuchis, Nicholas. 1991. Mea Culpa: A Sociology of Apology and Reconciliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Thornborrow, Johanna. 2002. Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tome, Vicente. 1992. Maintaining credibility as a partial mediator: United States mediation in Southern Africa, 1981–1988. Negotiation Journal 8: 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure. New Brunswick and London: Transactions.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1979. Frame, flow and reflection: Ritual and drama as public liminality. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 6(4): 465–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1982. From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. New York: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar
van Dijk, , Teun, A. 1988. Opinions and ideologies in the press. In Bell, Allan and Garrett, Peter (eds.), Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell, 21–63.Google Scholar
van Dijk, , Teun, A. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplonary Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
van Dijk, , Teun, A. 2008. News, discourse, and ideology. In Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin and Hanitzsch, Thomas (eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Taylor & Francis, 191–204.Google Scholar
van Dijk, , Teun, A. 2017. What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11: 11–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Gelder, Maartje and Krstić, Tijana. 2015. Introduction: Cross-confessional diplomacy and diplomatic intermediaries in the early modern Mediterranean. Journal of Early Modern History 19(2–3): 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700658-12342452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2009. Critical discourse analysis. In Renkema, Jan (ed.), Discourse, of Course: An Overview of Research in Discourse Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderveken, Daniel. 1990. Meaning and Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vasquez, Camila. 2011. Complaints online: The case of TripAdvisor. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6): 1707–1717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 2012. Ideology in Language Use: Pragmatic Guidelines for Empirical Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026277.Google Scholar
Vessey, Rachelle. 2016. Language ideologies in social media: The case of Pastagate. Journal of Language and Politics 15(1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.1.01ves.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vladimirou, Dimitra, House, Juliane and Kádár, Dániel Z. 2021. Aggressive complaining on social media: The case of #MuckyMerton. Journal of Pragmatics 177: 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollmer, Helmut and Olsthain, Elite. 1989. Apologies in German. In Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, House, Juliane and Kasper, Gabriele (eds.), Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 197–220.Google Scholar
Wahlström, Jarl. 2016. Constructing the moral order of a relationship in couples therapy. In Borcsa, Maria and Peter Rober (eds.), Research Perspectives in Couple Therapy. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23306-2_10.Google Scholar
Wallensteen, Peter and Svensson, Isak. 2014. Talking peace: International mediation in armed conflicts. Journal of Peace Research 51(2): 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62848-2_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Georgette and Katherine Chen, Yi-Ning. 2010. Collectivism, relations, and Chinese communication. Chinese Journal of Communication 3(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750903528708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, Dale P. and Tucker., Raymond K. 1974. Heckling as distraction: An experimental study of its effect on source credibility. Speech Monographs 41(2): 185–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757409375834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard. 1999. Language and politeness in early eighteenth-century Britain. Pragmatics 9(1): 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.02wat.Google Scholar
Wehr, Paul and Lederach, John. 1991. Mediating conflict in Central America. Journal of Peace Research 21(1): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343391028001009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda and Dori-Hacohen, Gonen. 2017. On-line commenting on opinion editorials: A cross-cultural examination of face work in the Washington Post (USA) and NRG (Israel). Discourse, Context & Media 19: 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisser, Martin. 2014. Speech act annotation. In Aijmer, Karin and Rühlemann, Cristoph (eds.), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 84–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, Henry. 1995. Discourse analysis: A critical view. Language and Literature 4(3): 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/09639470950040030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfield, Betty H., Mizuno, Takeya and Beaudoin, Christopher E.. 2000. Confucianism and constitutions: Press systems in China and Japan. Communication Law and Society 5(3): 323–347. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326926CLP0503_2.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2007. Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry. Pragmatics & Cognition 15(1): 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2011. Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. In Zienkowski, Jan, Östman, Jan-Ola and Verschueren, Jef (eds.), Discursive Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.8.04wod.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2017. Discourse about nationalism. In Flowerdew, John and Richardson, John E. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. Routledge, London, 403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Boukala, Salomi. 2015. European identities and the revival of nationalism in the European Union: A discourse historical approach. Journal of Language and Politics 14(1): 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.1.05wod.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Krzyżanowski, Michal and Forchtner, Bernhard. 2012. The interplay of language ideologies and contextual cues in multilingual interactions: Language choice and code-switching in European Union institutions. Language in Society 41, 157–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404512000036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Linda A. and Kroger, Rolf O.. 2000. Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolard, Katharyn A. 2020. Language ideologies. In Stanlaw, James M. (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology. London: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.ie.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 1987. Meaning and Moral Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Hongwu. 2003. Further discussion on the concept of wenming. Red Flag Manuscripts 20: 5–7 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Yamazaki, Jane. 2006. Japanese Apologies for World War II: A Rhetorical Study. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Mayfair. 1997. Mass media and transnational subjectivity in Shanghai: Notes on (re)cosmopolitanism in a Chinese metropolis. In Ong, Aihwa and Nonini, Donald (eds.), Ungrounded Empires: The Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Transnationalism. New York: Routledge, 287–321.Google Scholar
Yusupova, Guzel. 2019. Exploring sensitive topics in an authoritarian context: An insider perspective. Social Science Quarterly. https://doi:10.1111/ssqu.12642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, Oliver. 2003. Nationalism in Europe, 1890–1940 (Studies in European History). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zoodsma, Marieke, Schaafsma, Juliette, Sagherian-Dickey, Thia and Friedrich, Jasper. 2021. These are not just words: A cross-national comparative study of the content of political apologies. International Review of Social Psychology 34(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar