Policy hypocrisy or political compromise? Assessing the morality of US policy toward undocumented migrants

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511755897.006

5 - Policy hypocrisy or political compromise? Assessing the morality of US policy toward undocumented migrants

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 May 2010

Amy Gurowitz

Edited by

Richard M. Price

Show author details

Richard M. Price: Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Immigrant receiving countries like the USA frequently profess their desire to keep out undocumented migrants. They use strong rhetoric to convey this to those inside and outside the state, and they adopt policies aimed at doing so. Yet, many of these policies are either known to be deficient or are only selectively enforced. The USA for example ‘cracks down’ on undocumented migration with methods known to be generally unsuccessful in deterring migration, and all the while not addressing what is referred to by experts as the ‘linchpin’ of migration control: employer demand.

In short, many aspects of immigration policy, especially those policies directed at undocumented migrants, display a high degree of hypocrisy. How do we assess our policies directed at undocumented migration from a moral standpoint? Are our immigration policies, or our selective enforcement of them, by definition immoral because they are knowingly, even at times intentionally, designed to obscure – in this case most often to convince the public that something is being done to stop undocumented migration when in reality government actions are half-hearted and intended to appease many different audiences of which a generally restrictionist public is just one? Most of us would want to answer in the affirmative – the hypocrisy is by definition immoral. Furthermore, theorists of ethics looking at migration also tend to agree that our policies toward undocumented migrants are morally questionable.

Type: Chapter
Information: Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics , pp. 138 - 164

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755897.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Gibney, Matthew J., ‘Liberal Democratic States and Responsibilities’, American Political Science Review 93 (1999), 170.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cornelius, Wayne A. and Tsuda, Takeyuki, ‘Controlling Immigration: The Limits of Government Intervention’. In Cornelius, Wayne A., Martin, Philip L. and Hollifield, James F. (eds.), Controlling Immigration (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004), 5.Google Scholar

Chavez, Leo R., Shadowed Lives: Undocumented Immigrants in American Society (New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, 1998), 48.Google Scholar

Nevins, Joseph, Operation Gatekeeper: The Rise of the ‘Illegal Alien’ and the Making of the US – Mexico Boundary (New York, NY: Routledge, 2002), 112.Google Scholar

Andreas, Peter, Border Games: Policing the US – Mexico Divide (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000) makes this point persuasively.Google Scholar

Hernstein, Richard J. and Murray, Charles, Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life (New York: Free Press Paperbacks, 1996)Google Scholar

Brimlow, Peter, Alien Nation: Common Sense About America's Immigration Disaster (New York: Random House, 1995)Google Scholar

Cornelius, Wayne A., ‘Death at the Border: Efficacy and Unintended Consequences of US Immigration Control Policy’, Population and Development Review 27 (2001), 669CrossRef Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael, ‘Membership’. In Jacobson, David (ed.), Immigration Reader (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1998), 342Google Scholar

Carens, Joseph H., ‘Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders’. In Jacobson, Immigration Reader, 365

Carens, Joseph H., ‘Membership and Morality: Admission to Citizenship in Liberal Democratic States’. In Brubaker, William Rogers (ed.), Immigration and the Politics of Citizenship in Europe and North America (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1989), 31.Google Scholar

Broder, John M., ‘With Congress's Blessing, a Border Fence May Finally Push Through to the Sea’, New York Times July 5, 2005, A8.Google Scholar

Torpey, John, The Invention of the Passport (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Beck, Roy and Camarota, Steven A., ‘Elite vs. Public Opinion: An Examination of Divergent Views on Immigration’, Center for Immigration Studies Backgrounder (December 2002), 1.Google Scholar

Citrin, Jack, Green, Donald P., Muste, Christopher and Wong, Cara, ‘Public Opinion Toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations’, The Journal of Politics 59 (1997), 858–881CrossRef Google Scholar

Fetzer, Joel S., ‘Economic Self-interest or Cultural Marginality? Anti-immigration Sentiment and Nativist Political Movements in France, Germany and the USA’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 26 (2000), 5–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Cornelius, Wayne A., ‘Ambivalent Reception’, in Suarez-Orozco, Marcelo M. and Paez, Mariela M. (eds.), Latinos: Remaking America (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Martin, Philip L., ‘The United States: The Continuing Immigration Debate’. In Cornelius, et al., Controlling Immigration, 71.

Cornelius, Wayne A., ‘The Structural Embeddedness of Demand for Mexican Immigrant Labor: New Evidence from California’. In Suarez-Orozco, Marcelo (ed.), Crossings (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998), 125.Google Scholar

Tichenor, Daniel J., ‘Commentary’. In Cornelius, et al., Controlling Immigration, 92.

Gutierrez, David G., Walls and Mirrors: Mexican Americans, Mexican Immigrants, and the Politics of Ethnicity (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1995), 211.

Reus-Smit, Christian, ‘Constructivism’. In Burchill, Scottet al. (eds.), Theories of International Relations (Hampshire: Palgrave, second edition, 2001), 218.Google Scholar

Lutz, Ellen L. and Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘International Human Rights Law and Practice in Latin America’, International Organization 54 (2000), 657.CrossRef Google Scholar