Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T20:18:19.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2019

Edited by
John W. Schwieter  and
Alessandro Benati
John W. Schwieter
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Alessandro Benati
Affiliation:
American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
Get access

Summary

While earlier research on second language learning may have distinguished language acquisition from language use (Krashen, 1982), more recent conceptualizations of second language learning have come to refer to the field of second language acquisition (SLA) as second language studies (e.g., Gass, Lee, & Roots, 2007) and second language development (e.g., Larsen-Freeman, 2018). In light of this conceptual shift, the focus has also expanded beyond the individual language learner, with the research lens turning towards the language teacher and the wider social ecology in which the learner is embedded. In tandem with the broadening of the field, there has been a marked increase in the volume of qualitative research published since Lazaraton’s (1995) earlier lament over the paucity of qualitative studies published in applied linguistics journals. While the distribution of qualitative research across international journals remains uneven (Benson et al., 2009), with some journals such as Applied Linguistics, The Modern Language Journal, System, and TESOL Quarterly being more open to the publication of qualitative research than others, the field of SLA has also witnessed a proliferation of handbook chapters on qualitative research (e.g., Benson, 2012; De Costa, Valmori, & Choi, 2017; Harklau, 2011; Lew, Yang, & Harklau, 2018) and books (e.g., Holliday, 2007; Mirhosseini, 2017b; Richards, 2003) that focus exclusively on qualitative research.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning , pp. 109 - 230
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Abbuhl, R., & Mackey, A. (2017). Second language acquisition research methods. In King, K. A., Lai, Y., & May, S. (eds.), Research methods in language and education (pp. 183–193). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. M. (1991). Focus on the language classroom: An introduction to classroom research for language teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. (2017). Ethics in qualitative language education research. In Mirhosseini, S.-A. (ed.), Reflections on qualitative research in language and literacy education (pp. 59–73). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Anderson-Gough, F., Edgeley, C., & Sharma, N. (2017). Qualitative data management and analysis software. In Hoque, Z., Parker, L. D., & Covaleski, M. A. (eds.), The Routledge companion to qualitative accounting research methods (pp. 405–431). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Atkinson, D. (ed.) (2011). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Atkinson, D. (2014). Language learning in mindbodyworld: A sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 47, 467–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baralt, M. (2012). Coding qualitative data. In Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition (pp. 222–244). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barkhuizen, G. (2014). Research timeline: Narrative research in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 47(4), 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkhuizen, G. (2017). Investigating language tutor social inclusion identities. The Modern Language Journal, 101(S1), 61–75.Google Scholar
Benson, P. (2012). Qualitative methods: Overview. In Chapelle, C. A. (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 4773–4783). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Benson, P. (2018). Narrative analysis. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research (pp. 595–613). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Benson, P., Chik, A., Gao, X., Huang, J., & Wang, W. (2009). Qualitative research in 10 language teaching and learning journals, 1997–2006. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1),79–90.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bloome, D. (2012). Classroom ethnography. In Grenfell, M., Bloome, D., Hardy, C., Pahl, K., Roswell, J., & Street, B. (eds.), Language, ethnography, and education: Bridging New Literacy Studies and Bourdieu (pp. 8–26). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burns, A., & Edwards, E. (2016). Language teacher action research: Achiev-ing sustainability. English Language Teaching Journal, 70 (1), 6–15.Google Scholar
Burns, A., & McPherson, P. (2017). Action research as iterative design: Implications for English language education research. In Mirhosseini, S.-A. (ed.), Reflections on qualitative research in language and literacy education (pp. 105–120). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Calvert, M., & Sheen, Y. (2015). Task-based language learning and teaching: An action-research study. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 226–244.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2012). Teacher development in a global profession: An autoethnography. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 258–279.Google Scholar
Casanave, C. P. (2015). Case studies. In Paltridge, B. & Phakiti, A. (eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 119–136). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. & Duff, P. A. (eds.) (2003). Some guidelines for conducting quantitative and qualitative research in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 172–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S., & Richards, K. (guest eds.) (2016). Innovation in research methods in applied linguistics [Special issue]. Applied Linguistics, 37(1).Google Scholar
Collins, L., & Muñoz, C. (2016). The foreign language classroom: Current perspectives and future considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 133–147.Google Scholar
Copland, F. (2018). Observation and fieldnotes. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research (pp. 249–268). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Davis, K. A. (2012). Ethnographic approaches to second language acquisition research. In Chapelle, C. A. (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–8) (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
De Costa, P. I. (2014). Making ethical decisions in an ethnographic study. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 413–422.Google Scholar
De Costa, P. I. (2015a). Re-envisioning language anxiety in the globalized classroom through a social imaginary lens. Language Learning, 65(3), 504–532.Google Scholar
De Costa, P. I. (2015b). Tracing reflexivity through a narrative and identity lens. In Cheung, Y. L., Said, S. B. & Park, K. (eds.), Advances and current trends in language teacher identity research (pp. 135–147). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Costa, P. I. (2016a). Scaling emotions and identification: Insights from a scholarship student. Linguistics and Education, 34, 22–32.Google Scholar
De Costa, P. I. (ed.) (2016b). Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Costa, P. I., & Canagarajah, S. (guest eds.) (2016). Scalar approaches to language teaching and learning [Special issue]. Linguistics and Education, 34.Google Scholar
De Costa, P. I., & Norton, B. (guest eds.) (2017). Transdisciplinarity and language teacher identity [Special issue]. The Modern Language Journal, 101(S).Google Scholar
De Costa, P. I., Rawal, H., & Li, W. (2018). L2 teachers’ emotions: A sociopolitical and ideological perspective. In de Dios Martínez Agudo, J. (ed.), Emotions in second language teaching (pp. 91–108). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
De Costa, P. I., Rawal, H., & Zaykovskaya, I. (guest eds.) (2017). Study abroad in contemporary times: Toward greater methodological diversity and innovation [Special issue]. System, 71.Google Scholar
De Costa, P. I., Tigchelaar, M., & Cui, Y. (2016). Reflexivity, emotions and transnational habitus: The case of a “poor” cosmopolitan Chinese international student. AILA Review, 29, 173–198.Google Scholar
De Costa, P. I., Valmori, L., & Choi, I. (2017). Qualitative research methods. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 522–540). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Diao, W. (2017). Between the standard and non-standard: Accent and identity among transnational Mandarin speakers studying abroad in China. System, 71, 87–101.Google Scholar
Dillon, D. R. (2012). Grounded theory and qualitative research. In Chapelle, C. A. (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Douglas Fir Group (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19–47.Google Scholar
Duff, P. A. (2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference. An ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream. Applied Linguistics, 23, 289–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, P. A. (2007). Qualitative approaches to second language classroom research. In Cummins, J. & Davison, C. (eds.), Handbook of English language teaching (pp. 973–986). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Duff, P. A. (2012). How to carry out case study research. In Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition (pp. 95–116). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Duff, P. A. (2014). Case study research on language learning and use. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 233–255.Google Scholar
Duff, P. A. (2015). Transnationalism, multilingualism, and identity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 57–80.Google Scholar
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300.Google Scholar
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1998). SLA property: No trespassing! The Modern Language Journal, 82(1), 91–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (2006). Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 91(S1), 800–819.Google Scholar
Friedman, D. (2012). How to collect and analyze qualitative data. In Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition (pp. 180–200). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Galloway, N. (2017). Researching your own students: Negotiating the dual practitioner-researcher role. In McKinley, J. & Rose, H. (eds.), Doing research in applied linguistics: Realities, dilemmas, and solutions (pp. 146–156). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2015). Introducing global Englishes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gao, X. (2017). Dealing with criticism when publishing qualitative research. In McKinley, J. & Rose, H. (eds.), Doing research in applied linguistics: Realities, dilemmas, and solutions (pp. 225–234). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
García, O., Ibarra Johnson, S., & Seltzer, K. (2016). The translanguaging classroom: Leveraging student bilingualism for learning. Philadelphia, PA: Caslon.Google Scholar
Garrett, P. B. (2017). Researching language socialization. In King, K. A., Lai, Y.-J., & May, S. (eds.), Research methods in language and education (pp. 283–295). New York: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., Lee, J., & Roots, R. (2007). Firth and Wagner: New ideas or a new articulation? The Modern Language Journal, 91, 788–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 247–271.Google Scholar
Gonulal, T., Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (2017). The development of statistical literacy in applied linguistics graduate students. ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(1), 4–32.Google Scholar
Hadley, G. (2015). English for academic purposes in neoliberal universities: A critical grounded theory. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Hadley, G. (2017). Grounded theory in applied linguistics research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D. I. (2012). Meaningful literacy: Writing poetry in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 45(1), 105–115.Google Scholar
Harklau, L. (2011). Approaches and methods in recent qualitative research. In Hinkel, E. (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 175–189). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hawkins, M. R. (ed.) (2011). Social justice language teacher education. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hellermann, J. (2011). Members’ methods, members’ competencies: Looking for evidence of language learning in longitudinal investigations of other-initiated repair. In Doehler, S. P., Hellermann, J. H., & Hall, J. K. (eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 147–172). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hellermann, J., & Jakonen, T. (2017). Interactional approaches to the study of classroom discourse and student learning. In King, K. A., Lai, Y., & May, S. (eds.), Research methods in language and education (pp. 297–309). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. (2007). Doing and writing qualitative research (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H., Young, R. F., Ortega, L., Bigelow, M., DeKeyser, R., Ellis, N. C., & Talmy, S. (2014). Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(3), 361–421.Google Scholar
Jakonen, T., & Morton, T. (2015). Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 73–94.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (2016). Mindful L2 teacher education: A sociocultural perspective on cultivating teachers’ professional development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kanno, Y., & Harklau, L. (eds.) (2012). Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, and persistence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Prior, M. (2015). Analyzing storytelling in TESOL interview research. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 226–255.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2011). A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In Atkinson, D. (ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117–142). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
King, K. A., & Mackey, A. (2016). Research methodology in second language studies: Trends, concerns, and new directions. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 209–227.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2015). Applied linguistics: A theory of the practice. Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 454–465.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C., & Whiteside, A. (2007). Three fundamental concepts in second language acquisition and their relevance in multilingual contexts. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 907–922.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kubanyiova, M. (2009). Possible selves in language teacher development. In Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 314–332). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kubanyiova, M. (2015). The role of teachers’ future self-guides in creating L2 development opportunities in teacher-led classroom discourse: Reclaiming the relevance of language teacher cognition. The Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 565–584.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2018). Second language acquisition, WE and language as a complex adaptive system (CAS). World Englishes, 37(1), 80–92.Google Scholar
Lau, S. M. C. (2017). Classroom ethnography on critical language and literacy teaching and learning. In Mirhosseini, S.-A. (ed.), Reflections on qualitative research in language and literacy education (pp. 77–90). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Lazaraton, A. (1995). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A progress report. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 455–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, G., & Wallace, A. (2018). Flipped learning in the English as a foreign language classroom: Outcomes and perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 52(1), 62–84.Google Scholar
Lew, S., Yang, A. H., & Harklau, L. (2018). Qualitative methodology. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research (pp. 79–101). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Li, W. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30.Google Scholar
Li, W., & De Costa, P. I. (2017). Professional survival in a neoliberal age: A case study of an EFL teacher in China. Asia TEFL Journal, 14(2), 277–291.Google Scholar
Li, W., & De Costa, P. I. (2018). Exploring novice EFL teachers’ identity development: A case study of two EFL teachers in China. In Mercer, S. & Koustoulas, A. (eds.), Teacher psychology in SLA (pp. 86–104). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Luk, J. C. M. (2017). Classroom discourse and the construction of learner and teacher identities. In Wortham, S., Kim, D., & May, S. (eds.), Discourse and education (pp. 173–184). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Mahboob, A., Paltridge, B., Phakiti, A., Wagner, E., Starfield, S., Burns, A., Jones, R. H., & De Costa, P. I. (2016). TESOL Quarterly research guidelines. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 42–65.Google Scholar
Maloney, J., & De Costa, P. I. (2017). Imagining the Japanese heritage learner: A scalar perspective. Language, Discourse, & Society, 9(1), 35–52.Google Scholar
Mangual Figueroa, A., & Baquedano-López, P. (2017). Language socialization and schooling. In Duff, P. A. & May, S. (eds.), Language socialization (pp. 1–13). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Manosuthikit, A., & De Costa, P. I. (2016). Ideologizing age in an era of superdiversity: A heritage language practice perspective. Applied Linguistics Review, 7(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.Google Scholar
McKay, S. L. (2006). Researching second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Miller, E. R. (2018). Interaction analysis. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research (pp. 615–639). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mirhosseini, S.-A. (2017a). Introduction: Qualitative research in language and literacy education. In Mirhosseini, S.-A. (ed.), Reflections on qualitative research in language and literacy education (Vol. 29, pp. 1–13). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Mirhosseini, S.-A. (ed.) (2017b). Reflections on qualitative research in language and literacy education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Norris, S. (2014). The impact of literacy-based schooling on learning a creative practice: Modal configurations, practices and discourses. Multimodal Communication, 3(2), 181–195.Google Scholar
Norton, B., & De Costa, P. I. (2018). Research tasks on identity and language education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 90–112.Google Scholar
Ohta, A. S. (2017). Sociocultural theory and second/foreign language education. In Van Deusen-Scholl, N. & May, S. (eds.), Second and foreign language education (pp. 57–68). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2005). For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 427–443.Google Scholar
Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (2015). Approaches and methods in applied linguistics research. In Paltridge, B. & Phakiti, A. (eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 5–25). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., & Tardy, C. M. (2016). Ethnographic perspectives on academic writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paulus, T. M., Jackson, K., & Davidson, J. (2017). Digital tools for qualitative research: Disruptions and entanglements. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 751–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirini, J., Matelau-Doherty, T., & Norris, S. (2018). Multimodal analysis. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research (pp. 639–658). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Prior, M. T. (2018). Interview and focus group research. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research (pp. 225–248). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Riazi, A. M. (2017). Mixed methods research in language teaching and learning. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Richards, K. (2009). Trends in qualitative research in language teaching since 2000. Language Teaching, 42(2), 147–180.Google Scholar
Rose, H., & McKinley, J. (2017). The prevalence of pedagogy-related research in applied linguistics: Extending the debate. Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 599–604.Google Scholar
Sayer, P. (2013). Translanguaging, TexMex, and bilingual pedagogy: Emergent bilinguals learning through the vernacular. TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), 63–88.Google Scholar
Smotrova, T., & Lantolf, J. (2013). The function of gesture in lexically focused L2 instructional conversations. The Modern Language Journal, 97(2), 397–416.Google Scholar
Starfield, S. (2015). Ethnographic research. In Paltridge, B. & Phakiti, A. (eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 137–152). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sterling, S., & Gass, S. (2017). Exploring the boundaries of research ethics: Perceptions of ethics and ethical behaviors in applied linguistics research. System, 70, 50–62.Google Scholar
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Subtirelu, N. C., Mackey, A., & Plonsky, L. (2017). Working across methodological paradigms: Mixed methods research in applied linguistics. Workshop presented at Second Language Research Forum, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L., Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2015). Technologies, identities and expressive activity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 215–33.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. B. M. (2017). Classroom discourse: Theoretical orientations and research approaches. In Cenoz, J., Gorter, D., & May, S. (eds.), Language awareness and multilingualism (pp. 187–203). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Valmori, L., & De Costa, P. I. (2016). How do foreign language teachers maintain their proficiency? A grounded theory approach. System, 57, 98–108.Google Scholar
Van Compernolle, R. A. (2014). Sociocultural theory and L2 instructional pragmatics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Benati, A. G. (2015). Key terms in second language acquisition. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Wallace, M. J. (1998). Action research for language teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walqui, A., & van Lier, L. (2010). Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners: A pedagogy of promise. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.Google Scholar
Wargo, J. M., & De Costa, P. I. (2017). Tracing academic literacies across contemporary literacy sponsorscapes: Mobilities, ideologies, identities, and technologies. London Review of Education, 15(1), 101–114.Google Scholar
Waring, H. Z. (2017). Conversation analytic approaches to language and education. In King, K. A., Lai, Y.-J., & May, S. (eds.), Research methods in language and education (pp. 463–474). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Warriner, D., & Anderson, K. T. (2017). Discourse analysis in educational research. In King, K. A., Lai, Y.-J., & May, S. (eds.), Research methods in language and education (pp. 297–309). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Winke, P. (2017). Using focus groups to investigate study abroad theories and practice. System, 71, 73–83.Google Scholar
Wolff, D., & De Costa, P. I. (2017). Expanding the language teacher identity landscape: An investigation of the emotions and strategies of a NNEST. The Modern Language Journal, 101(S1), 76–90.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (2014). Becoming researchers: A narrative study of Chinese university EFL teachers’ research practice and their professional identity. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 242–259.Google Scholar
Zappa-Holman, S., & Duff, P. A. (2015). Academic English socialization through individual networks of practice. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 339–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaykovskaya, I., Rawal, H., & De Costa, P. I. (2017). Learner beliefs for successful study abroad experience: A case study. System, 71, 113–121.Google Scholar

References

Asher, J. J. (1972). Children’s first language as a model for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 56, 133–139.Google Scholar
Aubrey, S. (2017a). Measuring flow in the EFL classroom: Learners’ perceptions of inter- and intra-cultural task-based interactions. TESOL Quarterly, 51(3), 661–692.Google Scholar
Aubrey, S. (2017b). Inter-cultural contact and flow in a task-based Japanese EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 717–734.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., Mossman, S., & Vellenga, H. E. (2015). The effect of instruction on pragmatic routines in academic discussion. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 324–350.Google Scholar
Barkaoui, K. (2010). Explaining ESL essay holistic scores: A multilevel modeling approach. Language Testing, 27, 515–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkaoui, K. (2014). Quantitative approaches for analyzing longitudinal data in second language research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 65–101.Google Scholar
Beretta, A. (1986). Program-fair language teaching evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 431–444.Google Scholar
Boers, F., Dang, T. C. T., & Strong, B. (2017). Comparing the effectiveness of phrase-focused exercises: A partial replication of Boers, Demecheleer, Coxhead, and Webb (2014). Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 362–380.Google Scholar
Brown, J. (2014). Mixed methods research for TESOL. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8–22.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, L., & Muñoz, C. (2016). The foreign language classroom: Current perspectives and future considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 133–147.Google Scholar
De Costa, P., Valmori, L., & Choi, I. (2017). Qualitative research methods. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 541–561). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Silva, R. (2015). Writing strategy instruction: Its impact on writing in a second language for academic purposes. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 301–323.Google Scholar
Dolean, D. D. (2016). The effects of teaching songs during foreign language classes on students’ foreign language anxiety. Language Teaching Research, 20(5), 638–653.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas Fir Group (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 19–47.Google Scholar
Farley, A. P., Ramonda, K., & Liu, X. (2012). The concreteness effect and the bilingual lexicon: The impact of visual stimuli attachment on meaning recall of abstract L2 words. Language Teaching Research, 16(4), 449–466.Google Scholar
Galante, A., & Thomson, R. I. (2017). The effectiveness of drama as an instructional approach for the development of second language oral fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 115–142.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (2015). Experimental research. In Paltridge, B. & Phakiti, A. (eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 101–118). New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55, 575–611.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Sterling, S. (2017). Ethics in ISLA. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 577–595). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gilmore, A. (2008). Getting real in the language classroom: Developing Japanese students’ communicative competence with authentic materials. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Nottingham University.Google Scholar
Gilmore, A. (2011). “I prefer not text”: Developing Japanese learners’ communicative competence with authentic materials. Language Learning, 61(3), 786–819.Google Scholar
Hamada, Y. (2016). Shadowing: Who benefits and how? Uncovering a booming EFL teaching technique for listening comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 20(1), 35–52.Google Scholar
Hashemi, M. R. (2012). Reflections on mixing methods in applied linguistics research. Applied Linguistics, 33, 206–212.Google Scholar
Hashemi, M. R., & Babaii, E. (2013). Mixed methods research: Toward new research designs in applied linguistics. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 828–852.Google Scholar
Heras, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2015). The impact of CLIL on affective factors and vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 70–88.Google Scholar
Hung, H. T. (2017). Design-based research: Redesign of an English language course using a flipped classroom approach. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 180–192.Google Scholar
Jang, E. E., Wagner, M., & Park, G. (2014). Mixed methods research in language testing and assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 123–153.Google Scholar
Karimi, M. N. (2015). EFL learners’ multiple documents literacy: Effects of a strategy-directed intervention program. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 40–56.Google Scholar
Kartchava, E., & Ammar, A. (2014a). Learners’ beliefs as mediators of what is noticed and learned in the language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 86–109.Google Scholar
Kartchava, E., & Ammar, A. (2014b). The noticeability and effectiveness of corrective feedback in relation to target type. Language Teaching Research, 18(4), 428–452.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. (2013). Effects of pretask modeling on attention to form and question development. TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), 8–35.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N. (2015). Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. The Modern Language Journal, 99(4), 656–677.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200–213.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Rozovski-Roitblat, B. (2015). Retention of new words: Quantity of encounters, quality of task, and degree of knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 687–711.Google Scholar
Li, Q. (2012). Effects of instruction on adolescent beginners’ acquisition of request modification. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 30–55.Google Scholar
Lin, M. H. (2016). Effects of corpus-aided language learning in the EFL grammar classroom: A case study of students’ learning attitudes and teachers’ perceptions in Taiwan. TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 871–893.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. (2015). Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1980). Inside the “black box”: Methodological issues in classroom research on language learning. Language Learning, 30(1), 1–42.Google Scholar
Luke, D. (2004). Multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (2017). Classroom-based research. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 541–561). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mahboob, A., Paltridge, B., Phakiti, A., Wagner, E., Starfield, S., Burns, A., …, De Costa, P. I. (2016). TESOL Quarterly research guidelines. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 42–65.Google Scholar
Moranski, K., & Kim, F. (2016). “Flipping” lessons in a multi-section Spanish course: Implications for assigning explicit grammar instruction outside of the classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 830–852.Google Scholar
Nguyen, L. T. C., & Gu, Y. (2013). Strategy-based instruction: A learner-focused approach to developing learner autonomy. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 9–30.Google Scholar
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary development. In Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 174–200). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polio, C., & Friedman, D. A. (2017). Understanding, evaluating, and conducting second language writing research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Porte, G. (2012). Replication research in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rahimi, M. (2013). Is training student reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students’ feedback and writing. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 67–89.Google Scholar
Rassaei, E. (2015). Recasts, field dependence/independence cognitive style, and L2 development. Language Teaching Research, 19(4), 499–518.Google Scholar
Riazi, A. M., & Candlin, C. N. (2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47, 135–173.Google Scholar
Saito, Y., & Saito, K. (2017). Differential effects of instruction on the development of second language comprehensibility, word stress, rhythm, and intonation: The case of inexperienced Japanese EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 589–608.Google Scholar
Sato, E., Chen, J. C. C., & Jourdain, S. (2017). Integrating digital technology in an intensive, fully online college course for Japanese beginning learners: A standards-based, performance-driven approach. The Modern Language Journal, 101(4), 756–775.Google Scholar
Scherer, G. A. C., & Wertheimer, M. (1964). A psycholinguistic experiment in foreign language teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Serrano, R., Stengers, H., & Housen, A. (2015). Acquisition of formulaic sequences in intensive and regular EFL programmes. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 89–106.Google Scholar
Short, D. J., Fidelman, C. G., & Louguit, M. (2012). Developing academic language in English language learners through sheltered instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 334–361.Google Scholar
Sonbul, S., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Explicit and implicit lexical knowledge: Acquisition of collocations under different input conditions. Language Learning, 63(1), 121–159.Google Scholar
Spada, N., Jessop, L., Tomita, Y., Suzuki, W., & Valeo, A. (2014). Isolated and integrated form-focused instruction: Effects on different types of L2 knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 18(4), 453–473.Google Scholar
Spinner, P., Gass, S. M., & Behney, J. (2013). Ecological validity in eye-tracking: An empirical study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 389–415.Google Scholar
Sun, C. H. (2017). The value of picture-book reading-based collaborative output activities for vocabulary retention. Language Teaching Research, 21(1), 96–117.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Tavakoli, P., Campbell, C., & McCormack, J. (2016). Development of speech fluency over a short period of time: Effects of pedagogic intervention. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 447–471.Google Scholar
Tian, L., & Macaro, E. (2012). Comparing the effect of teacher codeswitching with English-only explanations on the vocabulary acquisition of Chinese university students: A lexical focus-on-form study. Language Teaching Research, 16(3), 367–391.Google Scholar
Tomita, Y., & Spada, N. (2013). Form-focused instruction and learner investment in L2 communication. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 591–610.Google Scholar
Wegener, D., & Blankenship, K. (2007). Ecological validity. In Baumeister, R. F. & Vohs, K. D. (eds.), Encyclopedia of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 275–276). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Xu, Y., Chang, L. Y., & Perfetti, C. A. (2014). The effect of radical-based grouping in character learning in Chinese as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 98(3), 773–793.Google Scholar
Yasuda, S. (2011). Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing: Developing writers’ genre awareness, linguistic knowledge, and writing competence. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 111–133.Google Scholar
Yeldham, M. (2016). Second language listening instruction: Comparing a strategies-based approach with an interactive, strategies/bottom-up skills approach. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 394–420.Google Scholar

References

Alexander, L., & Onslow-Mato, W. (2015). Students as active protagonists in the reading process: Developing tasks for critical reading in the EAP classroom. Research Notes, 60, 30–37.Google Scholar
Allison, D., & Carey, J. (2007). What do university language teachers say about language teaching research? Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 24(2), 61–81.Google Scholar
Allwright, D. (1997). Quality and sustainability in teacher-research. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 368–370.Google Scholar
Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Al-Maskari, A. S. (2015). Suppporting teacher research through a practical in-service course. In Borg, S. & Santiago-Sanchez, H. (eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 113–124). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Atay, D. (2008). Teacher research for professional development. ELT Journal, 62(2), 139–147.Google Scholar
Banegas, D. L. (2012). Identity of the teacher-researcher in collaborative action research: Concerns reflected in a research journal. PROFILE, Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 14(2), 29–43.Google Scholar
Banegas, D. L., Pavese, A., Velázquez, A., & Vélez, S. M. (2013). Teacher professional development through collaborative action research: Impact on foreign English-language teaching and learning. Educational Action Research, 21(2), 185–201.Google Scholar
Barkhuizen, G. (2017). Reflections on language teacher identity research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beasley, B., & Riordan, L. (1981). The classroom teacher as researcher. English in Australia, 55(1), 36–42.Google Scholar
Borg, S. (2013). Teacher research in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Borg, S. (2015). Professional development through the Cambridge English/English UK Action Research Scheme. Research Notes, 61, 3–5.Google Scholar
Borg, S., & Burns, A. (2008). TESOL research: What? How? Why? Pre-convention event, 2 April, 42nd Annual Convention, New York.Google Scholar
Borg, S., & Lui, Y. (2013). Chinese English college teachers’ engagement with research. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 270–299.Google Scholar
Breen, M., Candlin, C., Dam, L., & Gabrielsen, G. (1989). The evolution of a teacher training program. In Johnson, K. (ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 111–135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. (1990). Towards a research agenda for TESOL. Prospect, 6(1), 7–26.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C., & Mitchell, R. (1989). The language classroom as a focus for research. In Brumfit, C. & Mitchell, R. (eds.), Research in the language classroom (pp. 3–15). London: Modern English Publications and The British Council.Google Scholar
Bullock, D., & Smith, R. (eds.) (2015). Teachers research! Faversham: IATEFL.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (2000). Facilitating collaborative action research: Some insights from the AMEP. Prospect, 15(3), 23–34.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (2011). Action research in the field of second language teaching and learning. In Hinkel, E. (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 237–253). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (2016). From reluctant teacher to teacher educator: A “brilliant” career. In Ellis, R. (ed.), Being and becoming an applied linguist (pp. 301–330). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (2017). “This life-changing experience”: Teachers becoming action researchers. In Barkhuizen, G. (ed.), Reflections on language teacher identity research (pp. 133–138). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burns, A., & Brandon, K. (2017). Action research in ELICOS. Impact and insights from a national teacher development program. In Burns, A. & Khalifa, H. (Eds.), Second language assessment and action research (pp. 315–327). SiLT Series. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, A., Dikilitaş, K., Smith, R., & Wyatt, M. (eds.) (2017). Developing insights into teacher-research. Faversham: IATEFL. Retrieved from http://resig.weebly.com/uploads/2/6/3/6/26368747/burns_dikilitas_smith___wyatt_eds._2017.pdf.Google Scholar
Burns, A., & Kurtoglu-Hooton, M. (2016). Using action research to explore technology: International perspectives. London: The British Council.Google Scholar
Burns, A., & Khalifa, H. (eds.) (2017). Second language assessment and action research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, A., & McPherson, P. (2017). Action research as iterative design: Implications for English language education research. In Mirhosseini, S.-A. (ed.), Reflections on qualitative research in language and literacy education (pp. 105–120). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Burns, A., Westmacott, A., & Hidalgo Ferrer, A. (2016). Initiating an action research programme for university EFL teachers: Early experiences and responses. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 55–73.Google Scholar
Castellano, J., Mynard, J., & Rubesch, T. (2011). Action research: Student technology use in a self-access center. Language Learning and Technology, 15(3), 12–27.Google Scholar
Çelik, S., & Dikilitaş, K. (2015). Action research as a professional development strategy. In Borg, S. & Santiago Sanchez, H. (eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 125–138). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Corey, S. M. (1954). Action research in education. Journal of Educational Research, 47(5), 375–380,Google Scholar
Cárdenas, M. L. (2003). Teacher researchers as writers: A way to sharing findings. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 5(5), 49–64.Google Scholar
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Knowing through action research. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Castro Garcés, A. Y., & Martínez Granada, L. (2016). The role of collaborative action research in teachers’ professional development. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 18(1), 39–54.Google Scholar
Chan, C. (2016). School–university partnerships in English language teacher education. Tensions, complexities and the politics of collaboration. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Clark, M. A. (1994). The dysfunctions of the theory/practice discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 9–26.Google Scholar
Crookes, G. (1993). Action research for English language teachers: Going beyond teacher research. Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 130–144.Google Scholar
Crookes, G., & Chandler, P. M. (2001). Introducing action research into the education of postsecondary foreign language teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 34(2), 131–140.Google Scholar
Dajani, M. (2015). Preparing Palestinian reflective English language teachers through classroom-based action research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 116–139.Google Scholar
Dikilitaş, K., & Griffiths, C. (2017). Developing language teacher autonomy through action research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Dikilitaş, K., & Mumford, S. E. (2016). Supporting the writing up of teacher research: peer and mentor roles. ELT Journal, 70(4), 371–381.Google Scholar
Dikilitaş, K., Smith, R., & Trotman, W. (eds.) (2015). Teacher-researchers in action. Faversham: IATEFL. Retrieved from http://resig.weebly.com/uploads/2/6/3/6/26368747/teacher-researchers_in_action.pdf.Google Scholar
Dikilitaş, K., Wyatt, M., Hanks, J., & Bullock, D. (eds.) (2016). Teachers engaging in research. Faversham: IATEFL. Downloadable from http://resig.weebly.com/uploads/2/6/3/6/26368747/teachers_engaging_in_research.pdf.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edge, J., & Richards, K. (eds.) (1994). Teachers develop teachers research. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Edwards, E., & Burns, A. (2016a). Language teacher action research: Achieving sustainablity: ELT Journal, 70(1), 6–15.Google Scholar
Edwards, E., & Burns, A. (2016b). Language teacher-researcher identity negotiation: An ecological perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 50(3), 735–745.Google Scholar
Esposito, J., & Smith, S. (2006). From reluctant teacher to empowered teacher-researcher. One educator’s journey towards action research. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(3), 45–60.Google Scholar
Fanselow, J. (1987). Breaking rules: Generating and exploring alternatives in language teaching. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Field, J., Graham, A., Griffiths, E., & Head, K. (eds.) (1997), Teachers develop teachers research 2. Whitstable: IATEFL.Google Scholar
Freeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher research. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Freeman, D., & Richards, J. C. (eds.) (1996). Teacher learning in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hei, K. C., & David, M. K. (2017). Empowering language teachers through action research: Two case studies from Malaysia. English Review: Journal of English Education, 5(2), 163–174.Google Scholar
Hine, G. S. C. (guest ed.) (2013). The importance of action research in teacher education programs [Special issue]. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2).Google Scholar
Holliday, A. (2001). Doing and writing qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kutlay, N. (2013). A survey of English language teachers’ views of research. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 188–206.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics, ed. Lewin, G. W.. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mangion, L., & Stokes, P. (2017). Using cloud computing to increase collaboration in developing writing skills. Research Notes, 67, 7–12,Google Scholar
McKay, S. (2006). Researching second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McFarland, K. P., & Stansell, J. C. (1993). Historical perspectives. In Patterson, L., Santa, C. M., Short, C. G., & Smith, K. (eds.), Teachers are researchers: Reflection and action (pp. 12–18). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Mathew, R., Eapen, R. L., & Tharu, J. (eds.) (2000). The language currriculum: Dynamics of change, Vol. 1. The outsider perspective. Report of the International Seminar 1995. Hyderabad: Orient Longman for the Central Institute for English and Foreign Language Studies.Google Scholar
McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for language teachers. London, England: Arnold.Google Scholar
McDonough, K. (2006). Action research and the professional development of graduate teaching assistants. The Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 33–47.Google Scholar
McKay, S. L. (2006). Researching second language classrooms. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McKay, S. L. (2009). Second language classroom research. In Burns, A. & Richards, J. C. (eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 281–288). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mehrani, M. B. (2016). A narrative study of Iranian EFL teachers’ experiences of doing action research. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 5(1), 93–112.Google Scholar
MEST (2016). The National Curriculum Policy. Nairobi: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Mok, A. (1997). Student empowerment in an English language enrichment programme: An action research project in Hong Kong. Educational Action Research, 5(2), 305–320.Google Scholar
NCTE (2009). National curriculum framework for teacher education. New Delhi: National Council for Teacher Education.Google Scholar
Negi, J. S. (2016). Improving teaching through action research; Perceptions, practices and problems (3Ps): Voices from secondary level teachers in an EFL context. ELT Voices, 6(4), 18–30.Google Scholar
NFL2020 (2014). Competency framework for English language teachers. Hanoi: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Harlow: Longman and Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. C. (1987). The teacher as curriculum developer. Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Centre.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. C. (1989). Understanding language classrooms. A guide for teacher-initiated action. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
O’Brien, T., Newnham, G., & Tinker, L. (2000). Collaborative practice-based research in supporting the language development of primary level bilingual children: A case study. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 43–64.Google Scholar
Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (eds.) (2015). Research methods in applied linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Perrett, G. (2003). Teacher development through action research: A case study in focused action research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
Pickering, G., & Gunashekar, P. (eds.) (2015). Innovation in language teacher education. London: The British Council.Google Scholar
Rainey, I. (2000). Action research and the English as a foreign language practitioner: Time to take stock. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
Rajuan, M. (2015). Practice and principles of pre-service action research. In Borg, S. & Santiago-Sanchez, H. (eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 139–151). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ramani, W. (1987). Theorizing from the classroom. ELT Journal, 41(1), 3–11.Google Scholar
Rebolledo, P., Smith, R., & Bullock, D. (eds.) (n.d.). Champion teachers: Stories of exploratory action research. London: The British Council.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Richards, K., Ross, S., & Seedhouse, P. (2012). Research methods for applied language studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (1986). Action research: An introduction. Teacher Development SIG Newsletter, No. 4. Faversham: IATEFL.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (1998). Language teacher education. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Somekh, B., & Zeichner, K. (2009). Action research for educational reform: Remodelling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 5–21.Google Scholar
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
TESOL (2004). TESOL 2004 Annual Report. Alexandria, VA: TESOL International. Retrieved from http://www.tesol.org/docs/annual-reports/arp2004.pdf?sfvrsn=4.Google Scholar
Tinker Sachs, G. (ed.) (2002), Action research in English language teaching. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Tran, A., Burns, A., & Ollerhead, S. (2017). ELT lecturers’ experiences of a new research policy: Exploring emotion and academic identity, System, 67, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trent, J. (2010). Teacher education as identity construction: Insights from action research. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 36(2), 153–168.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. (1994). Action research. Sintagma, 6, 31–37.Google Scholar
Viera, F. (2003). Addressing constraints on autonomy in school contexts: Lessons from working with teachers. In Palfreyman, D. & Smith, R. C. (eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 220–239). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Vilches, J. U. (2007). Teacher autonomy: A critical review of the research and concept beyond applied linguistics. Í kala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 12(18), 245–275.Google Scholar
Wallace, M. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, M. (1998). Action research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., & Zhang, H. (2014). Promoting teacher autonomy through university–school collaborative research. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 222–241.Google Scholar
Wyatt, M. (2010). Teachers researching their own practice. ELT Journal, 65(4), 417–425.Google Scholar
Wyatt, M., Burns, A., & Hanks, J. (2016). Teacher practitioner research: Reflections on an online discussion. TESL-EJ, 20(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Xie, J. (2015). Learning to do teacher research independently: Challenges and solutions. In Borg, S. & Santiago Sanchez, H. (eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 47–56). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (2014). Becoming researchers: A narrative study of Chinese university EFL teachers’ research practice and their professional identity construction. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 242–259.Google Scholar
Yoshida, T., & Kambara, K. (2014). EFL teachers’ conceptual development and the transformation of teaching through narratives in the E-portfolio. In Said, B. S. & Zhang, L. (eds.), Language teachers and teaching: Global perspectives, local initiatives (pp. 219–236). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yuan, R. E., & Lee, I. (2015). Action research facilitated by university–school collaboration. ELT Journal, 69(1),1–10.Google Scholar
Yuan, R. E., & Burns, A. (2016). Teacher identity development through action research: A Chinese experience. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(6), 729–749.Google Scholar
Yucel, M., & Bos, V. (2015). Action research as a means of stepping out of the teaching comfort zone. In Borg, S. & Santiago Sanchez, H. (eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 29–46). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Yucel, B., & Gűndoğdu, M. A. (2017). Mentoring teachers as researchers. In Burns, A., Dikilitaş, K., Smith, R., & Wyatt, M. (eds.), Developing insights into teacher research (p. 29–38). Faversham: IATEFL.Google Scholar

References

Allen, J. P. B., & Carroll, S. (1987). Evaluation of classroom processes in a Canadian core French programme. Evaluation & Research in Education, 1, 49–61.Google Scholar
Allen, J. P. B., Fröhlich, M., & Spada, N. (1984). The communicative orientation of second language teaching: An observation scheme. In Handscombe, J., Orem, R., & Taylor, B. (eds.), On TESOL ’83 (pp. 232–252). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. (1991). Focus on the language classroom: An introduction to classroom research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574.Google Scholar
Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2002). Metalanguage in focus on form in the communicative classroom, Language Awareness, 11, 1–13.Google Scholar
Bellack, A., Herbert, A., Kliebard, M., & Smith, F. L. Jr. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Beretta, A., & Davies, A. (1985). Evaluation of the Bangalore Project. ELT Journal, 39, 121–127.Google Scholar
Borg, S. (1998). Teachers’ pedagogical systems and grammar teaching: A qualitative study. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 9–38.Google Scholar
Brock, C. (1986). The effects of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 47–59.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1988a). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1988b). Classroom research: Recent methods and research findings. In Kasper, G. (ed.), AILA review: Classroom research (Vol. 5, pp. 10–19). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1991). Validation in second language classroom research and the evaluation of teaching methods. In Phillipson, R., Kellerman, E., Selinker, L., Sharwood Smith, M., & Swain, M. (eds.), Foreign language pedagogy: A commemorative volume for Claus Faerch (pp. 187–196). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Duff, P. A. (2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: An ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream. Applied Linguistics, 22, 289–322.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fanselow, J. (1977). Beyond “Rashomon”—Conceptualizing and describing the teaching act. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 17–39.Google Scholar
Fazio, L., & Lyster, R. (1998). Immersion and submersion classrooms: A comparison of instructional practices in language arts. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 19, 303–317.Google Scholar
Flanders, N. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, M., Spada, N., & Allen, P. (1985). Differences in the communicative orientation of L2 classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 27–57.Google Scholar
Guilloteaux, M., & Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 55–77.Google Scholar
Harklau, L. (1994). ESL versus mainstream classes: Contrasting L2 learning environments. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 241–272.Google Scholar
Kim, S., & Elder, C. (2005). Language choices and pedagogic functions in the foreign language classroom: A cross-linguistic functional analysis of teacher talk. Language Teaching Research, 9, 335–380.Google Scholar
Lee, Y. (2006). Respecifying display questions: Interactional resources for language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 691–713.Google Scholar
Levin, L. 1972. Comparative studies in foreign-language teaching. Stockholm: Almquist och Wiksell.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P., Halter, R., White, J., & Horst, M. (2002). Comprehension-based learning: The limits of “do it yourself”. Canadian Modern Language Journal, 58, 427–464.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1980). Inside the “black box”: Methodological issues in classroom research on language learning. Language Learning, 30, 1–42.Google Scholar
Long, M., & Sato, C. (1984). Methodological issues in interlanguage studies: An interactionist perspective. In Davies, A., Criper, C., & Howatt, A. (eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 253–280). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269–300.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1–40.Google Scholar
Macaro, E. (2001). Analysing student teachers codeswitching in foreign language classrooms: Theories and decision making. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 531–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction and second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Markee, N. (2005). Conversation analysis for second language acquisition. In Hinkel, E. (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 355–374). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McCormick, D., & Donato, R. (2000). Teacher questions as scaffolding assistance in an ESL classroom. In Hall, J. & Verplaetse, L. (eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 183–201). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McKay, S. (2006). Researching second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeil, L. (2012). Using talk to scaffold referential questions for English language learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 396–404.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. (1985a) Communicative interaction research project: Final report. Stirling: Department of Education, University of Stirling.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. (1985b) Process research in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 18, 330–352.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Parkinson, B., & Johnstone, R. (1981). The foreign language classroom an observational study. Stirling: University of Stirling.Google Scholar
Moskowitz, G. (1976). The FLINT system: An observational tool for the foreign language classroom. In Simon, A. & Boyer, E. (eds.), Mirrors for behavior: An anthology of classroom observation instruments (pp. 125–157). Philadelphia, PA: Center for the Study of Teaching at Temple University.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (2005). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1987) Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal, 41, 136–145.Google Scholar
Polio, C., & Duff, P. A. (1994). Teachers’ language use in university foreign language classrooms: A qualitative analysis of English and target language alternation. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 313–326.Google Scholar
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). Corrective feedback makes a difference: A meta-analysis of the research. In Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Savignon, S. (1972). Communicative competence: An experiment in foreign language teaching. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Scherer, A., & Wertheimer, M. (1964). A psycholinguistic experiment in foreign language teaching. New York: McGrawHill.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2010). The incidental acquisition of plural -s by Japanese children in comprehension-based and production-based lessons: A process-product study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(4), 607–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simard, D., & Jean, G. (2011). Exploration of L2 teachers’ use of pedagogical interventions. Language Learning, 61, 759–785.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, P. (1970). A comparison of the audiolingual and cognitive approaches to foreign language instruction: The Pennsylvania foreign language project. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Spada, N. (1987). Relationships between instructional differences and learning outcomes: A process-product study of communicative language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 8, 131–161.Google Scholar
Spada, N., & Fröhlich, M. (1995). COLT. Communicative orientation of language teaching observation scheme. Sydney: National Center of English Language Teaching and Research.Google Scholar
Spada, N., & Lyster, R. (1997). Microscopic and macroscopic views of second language classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 787–795.Google Scholar
Ullman, R., & Geva, E. (1985). Expanding our evaluation perspective: What can classroom observation tell us about Core French programs? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 42, 307–323.Google Scholar
Watson-Gegeo, K. A. (1988). Ethnography in ELS: Defining the essentials. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 575–592.Google Scholar

References

Alemán Bañón, J., Fiorentino, R., & Gabriele, A. (2012). The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of structural distance. Brain Research, 1456, 49–63.Google Scholar
Altmann, G. (2011). Language can mediate eye movement control within 100 milliseconds, regardless of whether there is anything to move the eyes to. Acta Psychologica, 137, 190–200.Google Scholar
Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2005). Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 137–153.Google Scholar
Caffarra, S., Molinaro, N., Davidson, D., & Carreiras, M. (2015). Second language syntactic processing revealed through event-related potentials: An empirical review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews, 51, 31–47.Google Scholar
Chen, L., Shu, H., Liu, Y., Zhao, J., & Li, P. (2007). ERP signatures of subject–verb agreement in L2 learning. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 10, 161–174.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures in government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 564–570.Google Scholar
Cunnings, I. (2017). Parsing and working memory in bilingual sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 659–678.Google Scholar
Davidson, D., & Indefrey, P. (2011). Error-related activity and correlates of grammatical plasticity. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 219.Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E., & Cramer Scaltz, T. R. (2008). Spanish-English L2 speakers’ use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading. Acta Psychologia, 128, 501–513.Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand: Grammatical gender processing in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 353–387.Google Scholar
Duyck, W., Van Assche, E., Drighe, D., & Hartsuiker, R. (2007). Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: Evidence for nonselective lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 663–679.Google Scholar
Ellert, M. (2011). Ambiguous Pronoun Resolution in L1 and L2 German and Dutch. Unpublished PhD thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.Google Scholar
Felser, C., & Cunnings, I. (2011). Processing reflexives in English as a second language: The role of structural and discourse-level constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 571–603.Google Scholar
Felser, C., Sato, M., & Bertenshaw, N. (2009). The online application of binding Principle A in English as a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 485–502.Google Scholar
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2012a). Can late L2 learners acquire grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 226–248.Google Scholar
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2012b). Grammatical gender processing in L2: Electrophysiological evidence of the effect of L1-L2 syntactic similarity: Erratum. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(1), 202.Google Scholar
Franceschina, F. (2001). Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research, 17, 213–247.Google Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C. (2005). Eye-movement recording as a tool for studying syntactic processing in a second language: A review of methodologies and experimental findings. Second Language Research, 21, 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J. (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 50A, 119–148.Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357–1392.Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1219–1248.Google Scholar
Friederici, A., Steinhauer, K., & Pfeifer, E. (2002). Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 99, 529–534.Google Scholar
Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., & Hickok, G. (1996). Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism. Cognition, 59, 21–39.Google Scholar
Goad, H., & White, L. (2006). Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic approach. Second Language Research, 22(3), 243–268.Google Scholar
Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research, 28(2), 191–215.Google Scholar
Grüter, T., Rohde, H., & Schafer, A. J. (2014). The role of discourse-level expectations in nonnative speakers’ referential choices. In Orman, W. and Valleau, M. J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, BUCLD 38 (pp. 179–191). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Gender electrified: ERP evidence on the syntactic nature of gender processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Resesarch, 28, 715–728.Google Scholar
Hagoort, P., & Indefrey, P. (2014). The neurobiology of language beyond single words. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 37, 347–362.Google Scholar
Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Processing a second language: Late learners’ comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 4(2), 123–141.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Liszka, S. (2003). Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. In Hout, R., Hulk, A., Kuiken, F., & Towell, R. (eds.), The lexicon–syntax interface in second language acquisition (pp. 21–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hernandez, A. E., Hofmann, J., & Kotz, S. A. (2007). Age of acquisition modulates neural activity for both regular and irregular syntactic functions. NeuroImage, 36(3), 912–923.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflectional morphology: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–931.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2013). Semantics and morphosyntax in predictive L2 sentence processing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53, 277–306.Google Scholar
Jiang, N. (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 603–634.Google Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1995). Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 483–516.Google Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1996). Garden path sentences and error data in second language processing research. Language Learning, 46, 286–324.Google Scholar
Juffs, A., & Rodriguez, G. A. (2014). Second language sentence processing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228–238.Google Scholar
Kaan, E. (2014). Predictive processing in L1 and L2. What’s different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4, 257–282.Google Scholar
Keating, G. D. (2009). Sensitivity to violations in gender agreement in native and nonnative Spanish: An eye-movement investigation. Language Learning, 59(3), 503–535.Google Scholar
Kolk, H. H. J., Chwilla, D. J., Van Herten, M., & Oor, P. J. W. (2003). Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 85, 1–36.Google Scholar
Kotz, S. A., Holcomb, P., & Osterhout, L. (2008). ERPs reveal comparable syntactic sentence processing in early bilinguals and monolinguals. Acta Psychologica, 128, 514–527.Google Scholar
Lee, M. W. E. (2002). Implementing subject–verb number agreement in a non-native language. Poster presented at the 15th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York.Google Scholar
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2010). Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 447–464.Google Scholar
Liversedge, S., Paterson, K., & Pickering, M. (1998). Eye movements and measures of reading time. In Underwood, G. (ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 55–75). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 97–115.Google Scholar
Martin, C., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J.-R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 574–588.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, J., Tanner, D., Pitkanen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C., Inoue, K., Valentine, G., & Osterhout, L. (2010). Brain potentials reveal discrete stages of L2 grammatical learning. Language Learning, 60(S2), 123–150.Google Scholar
Molinaro, N., Barber, H. A., Caffarra, S., & Carreiras, M. (2015). On the left anterior negativity (LAN): The case of morphosyntactic agreement: A reply to Tanner et al. Cortex, 66, 156–159.Google Scholar
Molinaro, N., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions. Cortex, 47, 908–930.Google Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M. T. (2010). Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning, 60, 154–193.Google Scholar
Nevins, A., Dillon, B., Malhotra, S., & Phillips, C. (2007). The role of feature number and feature type in processing Hindi verb agreement violations. Brain Research, 1164, 81–94.Google Scholar
Ojima, S., Nakata, H., & Kakigi, R. (2005). An ERP study of second language learning after childhood: Effects of proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(8), 1212–1228.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, P. L., & Van Petten, C. (2011). Morphological agreement at a distance: Dissociation between early and late components of the event related brain potential. Brain Research, 1392, 62–79.Google Scholar
Osterhout, L., McLaughlin, J., Pitkänen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C., & Molinaro, N. (2006). Novice learners, longitudinal designs, and event-related potentials: A means for exploring the neurocognition of second-language processing. Language Learning, 56(1), 199–230.Google Scholar
Paterson, K., Liversedge, S., & Underwood, G. (1999). The influence of focus operators on syntactic processing of short relative clause sentences. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 717–737.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (1998). Plausibility and recovery from garden-paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 940–961.Google Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103–133.Google Scholar
Proverbio, A. M., Cok, B., & Zani, A. (2002). Electrophysiological measures of language processing in bilinguals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(7), 994–1017.Google Scholar
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.Google Scholar
Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358–374.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Sereno, S., Morris, R., Schmauder, A., & Clifton, C. (1989). Eye movements and online language comprehension processes. Language and Cognition Processes, 4, 21–49.Google Scholar
Roberts, L. (2013). Sentence processing in bilinguals. In van Gompel, R. (ed.), Sentence processing. Current issues in the psychology of language (pp. 221–246). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, L., & Felser, C. (2011). Plausibility and recovery from garden-paths in second language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 299–331.Google Scholar
Roberts, L., González Alonso, J., Pliatsikas, C., & Rothman, J. (2018). Evidence from neurolinguistic methodologies: Can it actually inform linguistic/language acquisition theories and translate to evidence-based applications? Second Language Research, 34, 125–143.Google Scholar
Roberts, L., Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P. (2008). Online pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 333–357.Google Scholar
Roberts, L., & Liszka, S. (2013). Processing tense/aspect-agreement violations online in the second language: A self-paced reading study with French and German L2 learners of English. Second Language Research, 29, 413–439.Google Scholar
Roncaglia-Denissen, M. P., & Kotz, S. A. (2016). What does neuroimaging tell us about morphosyntactic processing in the brain of second language learners? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 665–973.Google Scholar
Rossi, S., Gugler, M., Friederici, A., & Hahne, A. (2002). The impact of proficiency on second language processing of German and Italian: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 2030–2048.Google Scholar
Rossi, S., Gugler, M. F., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A. (2006). The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(12), 2030–2048.Google Scholar
Rüschemeyer, S.-A., Fiebach, C. J., Kempe, V., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Processing lexical semantic and syntactic information in first and second language: fMRI evidence from German and Russian. Human Brain Mapping, 25(2), 266–286.Google Scholar
Rüschemeyer, S.-A., Zysset, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2006). Native and non-native reading of sentences: An fMRI experiment. NeuroImage, 31(1), 354–365.Google Scholar
Sabourin, L., & Stowe, L. A. (2008). Neurobiology of Language Learning. In Hult, F. M. & Spolsky, B. (eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 27–37). Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sabourin, L., Stowe, L. A., & de Haan, G. J. (2006). Transfer effects in learning a second language grammatical gender system. Second Language Research, 22, 1–29.Google Scholar
Sagarra, N., & Herschensohn, J. (2011). Proficiency and animacy effects on L2 gender agreement processes during comprehension. Language Learning, 61(1), 80–116.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, X. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 10(3), 209–231.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (guest ed.) (2009). The Fundamental Difference Hypothesis twenty years later [Special issue]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L. (2009). Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 195–210.Google Scholar
Steinhauer, K., White, E. J., & Drury, J. E. (2009). Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Second Language Research, 25(1), 13–41.Google Scholar
Suh, S., Yoon, H. W., Lee, S., Chung, J.-Y., Cho, Z.-H., & Park, H. (2007). Effects of syntactic complexity in L1 and L2; An fMRI study of Korean-English bilinguals. Brain Research, 1136(1), 178–189.Google Scholar
Tanner, D., Inoue, K., Osterhout, L. (2014). Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 17(2), 277–293.Google Scholar
Tanner, D., McLaughlin, J., Hershensohn, J., & Osterhout, L. (2013). Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 367–382.Google Scholar
Tanner, D., & van Hell, J. G. (2014). ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing. Neuropsychologia, 56, 289–301.Google Scholar
Tokowicz, N., & Macwhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 173–204.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I.-M., & Dimitrakopoulou, M. (2007). The Interpretability Hypothesis: Evidence from wh- interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 23, 215–242.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I.-M., & Sorace, A. (2006). Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In Bamman, D., Magnitskaia, T., & Zaller, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, BUCLD 30 (pp. 653–664). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
van Gompel, R. (2013). Sentence processing. Current issues in the psychology of language. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Weber, K., & Lavric, A. (2008). Syntactic anomaly elicits a lexico-semantic (N400) ERP effect in the second language but not the first. Psychophysiology, 45, 920–925.Google Scholar
Weber-Fox, C., & Neville, H. J. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(3), 231–256.Google Scholar
Wicha, N. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1272–1288.Google Scholar
Wilson, F. (2009). Processing at the syntax–discourse interface in second language acquisition. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-Macgregor, M., & Leung, Y.-K. I. (2004). Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 105–133.Google Scholar
Zawiszewski, A., Gutiérrez, E., Fernández, B., & Laka, I. (2011). Language distance and non-native syntactic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 14(3), 400–411.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×