Hostname: page-component-69cd664f8f-wm26l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-12T06:25:39.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français
Accepted manuscript

How Theory-laden are Observations of Black Holes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2025

Juliusz Doboszewski Open the ORCID record for Juliusz Doboszewski [Opens in a new window]  and
Jamee Elder Open the ORCID record for Jamee Elder [Opens in a new window]
Juliusz Doboszewski
Affiliation:
Black Hole Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jamee Elder*
Affiliation:
Black Hole Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. Philosophy Department, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: Jamee Elder; [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We evaluate the roles general relativistic assumptions play in simulations used in recent observations of black holes including LIGO-Virgo and the Event Horizon Telescope. In both experiments simulations play an ampliative role, enabling the extraction of more information from the data than would be possible otherwise. This comes at a cost of theory-ladenness. We discuss the issue of inferential circularity, which arises in some applications; classify some of the epistemic strategies used to reduce the extent of theory-ladenness; and discuss ways in which these strategies are model independent.

Type
Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Accepted manuscript , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Philosophy of Science Association

Footnotes

†

Authors contributed equally.