Hostname: page-component-69cd664f8f-96srj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-12T18:37:30.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Limitations of double-blind trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

D. B. Double
D. B. Double*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry University of Sheffield Northern General Hospital Sheffield S5 7AU
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 157 , Issue 2 , August 1990 , pp. 300
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1990 

References

Karlowski, T. R., Chalmers, T. C., Frenkel, L. D. et al. (1975) Ascorbic acid for the common cold. Journal of the American Medical Association, 231, 1038–1042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, M. S. & Shapiro, S. H. (1984) Scientific challenges in the application of randomised trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 252, 2739–2745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, I. M., Lelliott, P., Basoglu, M., et al. (1988) Clomipramine, self-exposure and therapist-aided exposure for obsessive-compulsive rituals. British Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 522–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newcombe, R. G. (1988) Evaluation of treatment effectiveness in psychiatric research. British Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 696–697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oxtoby, A., Jones, A. & Robinson, M. (1989) Is your ‘double-blind’ design truly double-blind? British Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 700–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.