Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-r8w4l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-11T16:42:32.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ON IDENTITIES OF REES QUOTIENTS OF FREE INVERSE SEMIGROUPS DEFINED BY POSITIVE RELATORS

Part of: Semigroups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2025

D. EASDOWN*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia
L. M. SHNEERSON
Affiliation:
Hunter College, City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We give a complete description of Rees quotients of free inverse semigroups given by positive relators that satisfy nontrivial identities, including identities in signature with involution. They are finitely presented in the class of all inverse semigroups. Those that satisfy a nontrivial semigroup identity have polynomial growth and can be given by an irredundant presentation with at most four relators. Those that satisfy a nontrivial identity in signature with involution, but which do not satisfy a nontrivial semigroup identity, have exponential growth and fall within two infinite families of finite presentations with two generators. The first family involves an unbounded number of relators and the other involves presentations with at most four relators of unbounded length. We give a new sufficient condition for which a finite set X of reduced words over an alphabet $A\cup A^{-1}$ freely generates a free inverse subsemigroup of $FI_A$ and use it in our proofs.

MSC classification

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Communicated by James East

The authors were supported by the Research Foundation of CUNY (Grant TRADA-54-217).

References

Adjan, S. I., ‘Identities of special semigroups’, Dokl. Acad. Nauk 143 (1962), 499502 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Adjan, S. I., ‘Defining relations and algorithmic problems for groups and semigroups’, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 85 (1966), 1152.Google Scholar
Baumslag, G., ‘Positive one-relator groups’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 156 (1971), 165183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, A. H. and Preston, G. B., The Algebraic Theory of Semigroups, Volume I, Mathematical Surveys, 7 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, J. H., Regular Algebra and Finite Machines (Chapman and Hall, London, 1971).Google Scholar
Crisp, J., ‘Injective maps between Artin groups’, in: Geometric Group Theory Down Under, Proceedings of a Special Year in Geometric Group Theory, Canberra, Australia, July 14–19, 1996 (eds. Cossey, J., et al.) (De Gruyter, Berlin, 1999), 119137.Google Scholar
Daviaud, L., Johnson, M. and Kambites, M., ‘Identities in upper triangular tropical matrix semigroups and the bicyclic monoid’, J. Algebra 501 (2018), 503525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bruijn, N. G., ‘A combinatorial problem’, Indag. Math. (N.S.) 49 (1946), 758764.Google Scholar
Dickson, L. E., ‘Finiteness of the odd perfect and primitive abundant numbers with $n$ distinct prime factors’, Amer. J. Math. 35(4) (1913), 413422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easdown, D. and Shneerson, L. M., ‘Principal Rees quotients of free inverse semigroups’, Glasg. Math. J. 45 (2003), 263267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easdown, D. and Shneerson, L. M., ‘Growth of Rees quotients of free inverse semigroups defined by small numbers of relators’, Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 23 (2013), 521545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edjvet, M. and Williams, G., ‘The cyclically presented groups with relators ${x}_i{x}_{i+k}{x}_{i+\ell }$ ’, Groups Geom. Dyn. 4(4) (2010), 759775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garside, F. A., ‘The braid group and other groups’, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. 20 (1969), 235254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilman, R. H., ‘Presentations of groups and monoids’, J. Algebra 57 (1979), 544554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, P. M., Techniques of Semigroup Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higman, G., ‘Ordering by divisibility in abstract algebras’, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) s3-2(1) (1952), 326336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howie, J. M., An Introduction to Semigroup Theory (Academic Press, London, 1976).Google Scholar
Isherwood, S. and Williams, G., ‘On the Tits alternative for cyclically presented groups with length-four positive relators’, J. Group Theory 25 (2022), 837850.Google Scholar
Izhakian, Z. and Margolis, S. W., ‘Semigroup identities in the monoid of two-by-two tropical matrices’, Semigroup Forum 80 (2010), 191218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubat, L. and Okninski, J., ‘Identities in the plactic monoid’, Semigroup Forum 90 (2015), 100112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, M. V., Inverse Semigroups: The Theory of Partial Symmetries (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lothaire, M., Combinatorics on Words (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997) (first published 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyndon, R. S. and Schupp, P. E., Combinatorial Group Theory (Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg–New York, 1977).Google Scholar
Margolis, S. W. and Meakin, J. C., ‘Free inverse monoids and graph immersions’, Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 3 (1993), 7999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohamed, E. and Williams, G., ‘An investigation into the cyclically presented groups with length three positive relators’, Exp. Math. 31 (2022), 537551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munn, W. D., ‘Free inverse semigroups’, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 29(3) (1974), 385404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, L., ‘Artin monoids inject in their groups’, Comment. Math. Helv. 77(3) (2002), 609637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, N. R., ‘Free generators in free inverse semigroups’, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 7 (1972), 407424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, N. R., ‘Free generators in free inverse semigroups: corrigenda’, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 9 (1973), 479480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozenberg, G. and Salomaa, A. (eds.), Handbook of Formal Languages. Volume 1: Word, Language, Grammar (Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg, 1997).Google Scholar
Scheiblich, H. E., ‘A characterization of a free elementary inverse semigroup’, Semigroup Forum 2 (1971), 7679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shneerson, L. M., ‘Remarks on the growth of inverse semigroups’, Contemp. Math. 360 (2004), 151165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shneerson, L. M. and Easdown, D., ‘Growth and existence of identities in a class of finitely presented inverse semigroups with zero’, Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 6 (1996), 105121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shneerson, L. M. and Easdown, D., ‘Growth of finitely presented Rees quotients of free inverse semigroups’, Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 21 (2011), 315328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shneerson, L. M. and Easdown, D., ‘On finite presentations of inverse semigroups with zero having polynomial growth’, Semigroup Forum 99 (2019), 391446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ufnarovsky, V. A., ‘Growth criterion for graphs and algebras given by words’, Mat. Zametki 31(3) (1982), 465472 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Ufnarovsky, V. A., ‘Combinatorial and asymptotic methods in algebra’, in: Algebra VI, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences (eds. Kostrikin, A. I. and Shafarevich, I. R.) (Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg, 1995).Google Scholar