Element contents
Series: Elements in Philosophy and Logic
Meinongianism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 January 2025
Summary
Meinongianism (named after Alexius Meinong) is, roughly, the view that there are not only existent but also nonexistent objects. In this book, Meinong's so-called object theory as well as “neo-Meinongian” reconstructions are presented and discussed, especially with respect to logical issues, both from a historical and a systematic perspective. Among others, the following topics are addressed: basic principles and motivations for Meinongianism; the distinction between “there is” (“x”) and “exists” (“E!”); interpretations and kinds of quantification; Meinongianism, the principle of excluded middle and the principle of non-contradiction; the nuclear-extranuclear distinction and modes of predication; varieties of neo-Meinongianism and Meinongian logics.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Philosophy and LogicOnline ISBN: 9781009181068Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 16 January 2025
References
Abell, C. (2020). Fiction: A Philosophical Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1979). Philosophical Papers. Ed. by Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J.. 3rd ed., Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, K. (1985–86). Failed reference and feigned reference: Much ado about nothing. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 25/26, 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barz, W. (2016). Two-dimensional Modal Meinongianism. Ratio (new series), 29, 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berto, F. (2008). Modal Meinongianism for fictional objects. Metaphysica, 9, 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berto, F. (2011). Modal Meinongianism and fiction: The best of three worlds. Philosophical Studies, 152(3), 313–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berto, F. (2013). Existence as a Real Property: The Ontology of Meinongianism, Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, R. B. (1933). Symposium: Imaginary objects. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. vol. 12, 44–54.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1874). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot. [Translation: Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint.]Google Scholar
Bueno, O. and Zalta, E. N. (2017). Object theory and Modal Meinongianism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 95(4), 761–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2016.1260609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1950). Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4, 20–40.Google Scholar
Castañeda, H.-N. (1979). Fiction and reality: Their fundamental connections. Poetics, 8, 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centrone, S. (2016). Relational theories of intentionality and the problem of non-existents. In Antonelli, M. and David, M., eds., Existence, Fiction, Assumption: Meinongian Themes and the History of Austrian Philosophy. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1–26.Google Scholar
Chisholm, R. M. (1972). Beyond being and nonbeing. In Haller, R., ed., Jenseits von Sein und Nichtsein: Beiträge zur Meinong-Forschung. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 25–33. [Published also, only slightly revised, in Philosophical Studies, 24(4), 1973, 245–257, and in R. M. Chisholm, Brentano and Meinong Studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1982, 53–67.]Google Scholar
Cocchiarella, N. B. (1969). Existence entailing attributes, modes of copulation and modes of being in second order logic. Noûs, 3, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, T. (2012). What is the problem of non-existence? Philosophia: Philosophical Quarterly of Israel, 40(3), 417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, S. (2019). Names. In E. N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2019 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/names/.Google Scholar
Currie, G. (1990). The Nature of Fiction, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, A. (2021). Now, imagine an actually existing unicorn: On Russellian worries for Modal Meinongianism. Axiomathes, 31(3), 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dölling, E. (2001). Alexius Meinong’s life and work. In Albertazzi, L., Jacquette, D., and Poli, R., eds., The School of Alexius Meinong. Aldershot: Ashgate, 49–76.Google Scholar
Eklund, M. (2019). Fictionalism. In E. N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/fictionalism/.Google Scholar
Everett, A. (2005). Against fictional realism. Journal of Philosophy, 102, 624–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, J. N. (1963). Meinong’s Theory of Objects and Values, London: Oxford University Press. [Revised and extended version of Meinong’s Theory of Objects from 1933.]Google Scholar
Fine, K. (1982). The problem of non-existents. I. Internalism. Topoi, 1, 97–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K. (1983). Symposium: A defence of arbitrary objects, I. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. Vol. 57, 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K. (1984). Critical review of Parsons’ Nonexistent Objects. Philosophical Studies, 45, 94–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, G. (1891/2021). Function und Begriff. In Frege, G., Ausgewählte Schriften zur Philosophie der Logik und der Sprache, ed. by Rami, D.. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 89–106. [Originally published 1891 in Jena by Pohle. English translation: Function and concept. In P. Geach and M. Black, eds. and transl., Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Blackwell, 3rd ed. 1980, 21–41. The German original is open access available at https://books.google.de/books?id=BtwEAAAAYAAJ&redir_esc=y&hl=de.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, G. (1892a/2021). Ueber Begriff und Gegenstand. In Frege, G., Ausgewählte Schriften zur Philosophie der Logik und der Sprache, ed. by Rami, D.. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 126–137. [Originally published in 1892 in Vierteljahresschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie, 16, 197–205. English translation: Concept and object. In P. Geach and M. Black, eds. and transl., Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Blackwell, 3rd ed. 1980, 42–55.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, G. (1892b/2021). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. In Frege, G., Ausgewählte Schriften zur Philosophie der Logik und der Sprache, ed. by Rami, D.. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 107–125. [Originally published in Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, N. F., 100/I, 1892, 25–50. English translation: On sense and reference. In P. Geach and M. Black, eds. and transl., Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Blackwell, 3rd ed. 1980, 56–78.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, G. (2021a). Dialog mit Pünjer über Existenz. In Frege, G., Ausgewählte Schriften zur Philosophie der Logik und der Sprache, ed. by Rami, D.. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 71–77. [Published only posthumously.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, G. (2021b). Auseinandersetzung mit Pünjer über Existenz. In G. Frege, Ausgewählte Schriften zur Philosophie der Logik und der Sprache, ed. by Rami, D.. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 78–84. [Published only posthumously.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gan, N. (2021). Fictionalism and Meinongianism. Theoria: Revista de Teoria, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, 36(1), 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geach, P. T. (1951). Symposion: On what there is. I. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. Vol. 25, 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, M. (2006). Talking about intentional objects. Dialectica, 60(2), 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, N. (1977). Russell’s “horrible travesty” of Meinong. Russell: The Journal of the Bertrand Russell Studies, 97, 39–51.Google Scholar
Griffin, N. (1985–86). Russell’s critique of Meinong’s theory of objects. In Haller, R., ed., Non-Existence and Predication. Amsterdam: Rodopi (= Grazer Philosophische Studien, 25/26), 375–401.Google Scholar
Grossmann, R. (2001). Meinong’s main mistake. In Albertazzi, L., Jacquette, D., and Poli, R., eds., The School of Alexius Meinong. Aldershot: Ashgate, 477–488.Google Scholar
Hale, B. (2007). “Into the abyss”: A critical study of Graham Priest: Towards Non-being: The Logics and Metaphysics of Intentionality. Philosophia Mathematica, 15, 94–110.Google Scholar
Hicks, G. D. (1922). The philosophical researches of Meinong (I.). Mind (n.s.), 31(121), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinchliff, M. (1988). A Defense of Presentism. Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Hofweber, T. (2000). Quantification and non-existent objects. In Everett, A. and Hofweber, T., eds., Empty Names, Fiction, and the Puzzles of Non-existence. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 249–273.Google Scholar
Ingarden, R. (1931/2012). Das literarische Kunstwerk, Tübingen, Niemeyer. Most recent edition: de Gruyter, 2012 (reprint of the 4th edition from 1972). [English translation: The Literary Work of Art, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973.]Google Scholar
Jackson, F. (1980). Ontological commitment and paraphrase. Philosophy: The Journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy, 55, 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquette, D. (1989). Intentional semantics and the logic of fiction. British Journal of Aesthetics, 29, 168–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquette, D. (1996). Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence, Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, A. K. (2002). Meinong’s much maligned modal moment. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 64, 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1763/2011). Der einzig mögliche Beweisgrund zu einer Demonstration des Daseins Gottes. Hamburg: Meiner. [First edition 1763.] The text of the Akademie-Ausgabe is open access available at https://korpora.zim.uni-duisburg-essen.de/kant/aa02/063.html.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1787/1929). Critique of Pure Reason. Transl. by N. K. Smith. London: Macmillan. This edition is open access available at https://ia800706.us.archive.org/13/items/immanuelkantscri032379mbp/immanuelkantscri032379mbp.pdf.Google Scholar
Kapitan, T. (1990). Preserving a robust sense of reality. In Jacobi, K. and Pape, H., eds., Thinking and the Structure of the World: Hector-Neri Castañeda’s Epistemic Ontology Presented and Criticized. Berlin: de Gruyter, 449–458.Google Scholar
Kroon, F. W. (1996). Characterizing non-existents. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 51, 163–193.Google Scholar
Kroon, F. (2008). Much ado about nothing: Priest and the reinvention of noneism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76, 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroon, F. (2011). The fiction of creationism. In Lihoreau, F., ed., Truth in Fiction. Heusenstamm: Ontos, 203–221.Google Scholar
Kroon, F. (2012). Characterization and existence in Modal Meinongianism. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 86, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Künne, W. (1990). Perception, fiction, and elliptical speech. In Jacobi, K. and Pape, H., eds., Thinking and the Structure of the World: Hector-Neri Castañeda’s Epistemic Ontology Presented and Criticized. Berlin: de Gruyter, 259–267.Google Scholar
Lambert, K. (1983). Meinong and the Principle of Independence: Its Place in Meinong’s Theory of Objects and its Significance in Contemporary Philosophical Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lambert, K. (1991). The nature of Free Logic. In Lambert, Philosophical Applications of Free Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–14.Google Scholar
Landini, G. (2017). Meinong and Russell: Some lessons on quantification. Axiomathes, 27(5), 455–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leblanc, H., and Hailperin, T. (1959). Nondesignating singular terms. Philosophical Review, 68, 239–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lejewski, C. (1954). Logic and existence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 5, 104–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, H. S. (1956). The logic of existence. Philosophical Studies, 7, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linsky, B. (2014). Ernst Mally’s anticipation of encoding. Journal for the History of Analytic Philosophy, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v2i5.40.Google Scholar
Macdonald, M. (1954). The language of fiction. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 27, 165–184. [Reprint in F. Tillman and S. M. Cahn, eds., Philosophy of Art and Aesthetics: From Plato to Wittgenstein, New York: Harper and Row, 1969, 617–630.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mally, E. (1912). Gegenstandstheoretische Grundlagen der Logik und Logistik, Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Marek, J. (2022). Alexius Meinong. In Zalta, E. N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2019 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/meinong/.Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1904/1960). Über Gegenstandstheorie. In Meinong, A., ed., Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie. Leipzig: Barth, 1–50. The original edition of the whole volume is open access available at https://archive.org/details/untersuchungenzu00mein/page/50/mode/2up, and it has been reprinted under the original title (Norderstedt: Verlag der Wissenschaften, 2015). The paper “Über Gegenstandstheorie” has been reprinted in Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe, ed. by R. Haller and R. Kindinger, together with R. Chisholm, vol. II: Abhandlungen zur Erkenntnistheorie und Gegenstandstheorie. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 1971, pp. 481–535. Transl. as “The theory of objects” in R. M. Chisholm (ed.), Realism and the Background of Phenomenology. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1960; reprint: Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1981, 76–117.Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1907/1973). Über die Stellung der Gegenstandstheorie im System der Wissenschaften. Leipzig: Voigtländer. The original edition of this work is open access available at https://archive.org/details/berdiestellungd00meingoog. It has been reprinted in Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe, ed. by R. Haller and R. Kindinger, together with R. Chisholm, vol. V. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 1973.Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1908/1978). Über Inhalt und Gegenstand. In Fabian, R. and Haller, R., eds., Kolleghefte und Fragmente. Schriften aus dem Nachlaß (=Ergänzungsband to Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe). Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt 1978, 145–159. [Written in 1908; only posthumously published.]Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1910/1968). Über Annahmen (second, revised edition). Leipzig: Barth, 1910. Vol. IV of Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe, ed. by R. Haller and R. Kindinger, together with R. Chisholm. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 1968. English translation: On Assumptions. Transl. with an introduction by J. Heanue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1983. The original from 1910 is open access available at https://archive.org/details/b28066820.Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1913/1978). Zweites Kolleg über gegenstandstheoretische Logik. In Fabian, R. and Haller, R., eds., Kolleghefte und Fragmente: Schriften aus dem Nachlaß (=Ergänzungsband to Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe). Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt 1978, 237–272. [Written in 1913; only posthumously published.]Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1915/1972). Über Möglichkeit und Wahrscheinlichkeit. Leipzig: Barth. Reprinted as vol. VI of Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe, ed. by R. Haller and R. Kindinger, together with R. Chisholm. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 1972.Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1917/1968). Über emotionale Präsentation. Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historischen Klasse der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissen-schaften in Wien, 183. Band, 2. Abhandlung. Reprinted in R. Haller and R. Kindinger, eds., Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe, vol. III. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 1968, 285–465. [English translation: On Emotional Presentation, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.]Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1917–18/1978). Viertes Kolleg über Erkenntnistheorie. In Fabian, R. and Haller, R., eds., Kolleghefte und Fragmente. Schriften aus dem Nachlaß (=Ergänzungsband to Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe). Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt 1978, 337–401. [Written in 1917–1918; only posthumously published.]Google Scholar
Meinong, A. 1921/1978: Selbstdarstellung. In Schmidt, R., ed., Die deutsche Philosophie der Gegenwart in Selbstdarstellungen, vol. 1. Leipzig: Meiner, 1921, 91–150. Reprinted in R. Haller and R. Kindinger, together with R. M. Chisholm, eds., vol. VII of Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe (Selbstdarstellung. Vermischte Schriften). Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 1978. Partial translation in R. Grossmann, Meinong. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974, 224–236.Google Scholar
Miravalle, J.-M. L. (2019). God, Existence, and Fictional Objects: The Case for Meinongian Theism, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Nolan, D. (2008). Properties and paradox in Graham Priest’s Towards Non-Being. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paoletti, M. P. (2015). A problem for ontological pluralism and a half-Meinongi-an solution. Philosophia: Philosophical Quarterly of Israel, 43(2), 463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T. (1975). A Meinongian analysis of fictional objects. Grazer Philosophi-sche Studien, 1, 73–86.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1995). Meinongian semantics generalized. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 50, 145–161.Google Scholar
Paśniczek, J. (1998). The Logic of Intentional Objects: A Meinongian Version of Classical Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perszyk, K. J. (1993). Nonexistent Objects: Meinong and Contemporary Philosophy, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, S. (2008). Symmetry and other relational properties of type <1, 1> quantifiers. In Peters, S. and Westerståhl, D., eds., Quantifiers in Language and Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 208–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199291267.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, G. (2005). Towards Non-Being: The Logic and Metaphysics of Intention-ality, Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Second, revised and extended edition: 2016.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, G. (2008). Replies to Nolan and Kroon. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76, 208–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, G. (2011a). Creating non-existents. In Lihoreau, F., ed., Truth in Fiction. Heusenstamm: Ontos, 107–118.Google Scholar
Priest, G. (2011b). Against against nonbeing. Review of Symbolic Logic, 4(2), 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, G. (2016). Towards Non-Being: The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Extended and revised edition of Priest 2005.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, A. N. (1971). Objects of Thought. Ed. by Geach, P. T. and Kenny, A. J. P.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1948/1953). On what there is. In Quine, W. V. O., From a Logical Point of View: 9 Logico-Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1–19. [Originally published in The Review of Metaphysics, 2(5), 1948, 21–38.]Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O (1969). Existence and quantification. In Quine, W. V. O., Ontological Relativity and other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapaport, W. J. (1978). Meinongian theories and a Russellian paradox. Noûs, 12, 153–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapaport, W. J. (1981). How to make the world fit our language: An essay in Meinongian semantics. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 14, 1–21.Google Scholar
Rapaport, W. J. (1985). To be and not to be: Critical study of Terence Parsons’s Nonexistent Objects. Noûs, 19, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reicher, M. E. (2005). Russell, Meinong, and the problem of existent nonexistents. In Linsky, B. and Imaguire, G., eds., On Denoting: 1905–2005. München: Philosophia, 167–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reicher, M. E. (2006). Two interpretations of “according to a story”. In Bottani, A. and Davies, R., eds., Modes of Existence: Papers in Ontology and Philosophical Logic. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos, 2006, 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reicher, M. E. (2008). Review of: Towards Non-Being. The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd ed. 2007. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 76, 255–258.Google Scholar
Reicher, M. E. (2022). Nonexistent objects. In E. N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2022 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nonexistent-objects/.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. (1959). On the logic of existence and denotation. Philosophical Review, 68, 157–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, N. (1968). The logic of existence. In Rescher, N., Topics in Philosophi-cal Logic. Dordrecht: Reidel, 138–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Routley, R. (1979). The semantical structure of fictional discourse. Poetics, 8, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Routley, R. (1980). Exploring Meinong’s Jungle and Beyond: An Investigation of Noneism and the Theory of Items, Canberra. [New edition in 4 volumes, each with supplementary essays: M. Eckert, ed., Exploring Meinong’s Jungle and Beyond (Volume 1, 2018); Dominic Hyde, ed., Noneist Explorations I (Volume 2, 2019); Dominic Hyde, ed., Noneist Explorations II (Volume 3, 2020); Zach Weber, ed., Ultralogic as Universal? (Volume 4, 2019). Cham: Springer.]Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1905a). On denoting. Mind, 14(56), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. (1905b). Critical notice of Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie, herausgegeben von A. Meinong. Mind, 14(56), 530–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. (1907). Critical notice of Über die Stellung der Gegenstandstheorie im System der Wissenschaften. Von A. Meinong. Leipzig: Voigtländer, 1907. Pp. xiii, 159. Mind, 16(63), 436–439.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1910–11). Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 11, 108–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. (1918–19). The philosophy of logical atomism. [Series of eight lectures, with discussion.] The Monist, 28(4), 1918, 495–527 (Lectures I and II), The Monist, 29, 1919, 32–63 (Lectures III and IV), 190–222 (Lectures V and VI), and 345–380 (Lectures VII and VIII). [A current edition is in Bertrand Russell, The Philosophy of Logical Atomism, with an introduction by D. Pears. London: Routledge, 1985, 1–125.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, G. (1933). Symposium: Imaginary objects. Proceedings of the Aristote-lian Society, Supp. Vol. 12, 18–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, G. (1973). Intentionality-theory and the nature of thinking. Revue interna-tionale de Philosophie, 27(2–3), 255–265.Google Scholar
Schubert Kalsi, M.-L. (1972). On Emotional Presentation, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schubert Kalsi, M.-L. (1978). Alexius Meinong: On Objects of Higher Order and Husserl’s Phenomenology, The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert Kalsi, M.-L. (1980). On Meinong’s pseudo-objects. The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 11(1), 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sendlak, M. (2022). On the methodological restriction of the principle of characterization. Erkenntnis, 87, 807–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, P. (1992). On what there isn’t: The Meinong-Russell dispute. In Simons, P., Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski. Selected Essays. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 159–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. F. (1985). The Russell-Meinong debate. Philosophy and Phenomeno-logical Research, 45(3), 305–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. F. (2005). Russell’s “On denoting”, the laws of logic and the refutation of Meinong. In Linsky, B. and Imaguire, G., eds., On Denoting: 1905–2005. München: Philosophia, 137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, A. L. (1999). Fiction and Metaphysics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, P. (1977). Creatures of fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly, 14(4), 299–308.Google Scholar
Voltolini, A. (2006). How Ficta Follow Fiction. A Syncretistic Account of Fictional Objects, Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, K. L. (1990). Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wettstein, H. (1984). Did the Greeks really worship Zeus? Synthese, 60, 439–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yagisawa, T. (2001). Against creationism in fiction. Philosophical Perspectives, 15, 153–172.Google Scholar
Zalta, E. N. (1983). Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics, Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalta, E. N. (1988). Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality, Cambridge; MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by